Re: US Patent 6630507 - Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants
|
|
I have no doubt that I am going to over-simplify, and exhibit my legal ignorance pertaining to filing, costs and procedures, but why isn't someone like NORML, or better yet a coalition of such organizations who could put together a fund, jumping all over this.
Way short of going for all out legalization, just demanding an official answer to "which branch is full of crap". A) The Judicial branch with zero medical expertise, or B) the USDoHHR,? Select and declare Answer A, or B please.
Seems like a small, reasonable place to start to me.
In my small mind, I envision the hippy handing the brief through the blacked out Bronco window to the dude in the suit with polished shoes and its a done deal, but in reality does it really cost that much more than me going to my local lawyer to write up and initiate a suit, and where exactly would this document be served?
The first paragraph clearly covers all Cannabinoids as the primary object without exception, then Para. 2 states the additional object of development of a non-psychoactive subset. Clearly covers all sources regardless of Delta 9 content or any other specification, so applicable to all pot.
Again, without getting into the ignore common sense, ignore all facts, ignore all world medical organizations, ignore all the voters in MMJ states, ignore feeding and clothing the whole world arguments, why aren't they being tasked to provide an answer to this basic question?
How much would it cost as some estimate, to file a suit against the Feds as stated?
__________________
If plants grew on grins and stares, mine would be Redwoods!
|