Heavy Opposition to Proposed Medical Marijuana Rule in Richfield Township

[User]

MI: A proposed ordinance spelling out where medical marijuana dispensaries can be located in Richfield Township has met heavy opposition even before a public hearing on its language.

"You are trying to stop people from growing altogether," declared Charlie Vanlandeghem, a township businessman and surrogate father of a 23-year-old who takes marijuana as a painkiller.

Vanlandeghem, who operates Van's Hydro Inc., an indoor/outdoor gardening business, told the township planning commission last week he doubts anyone could legally establish a dispensary in the township the way the current draft of the ordinance is written.

The draft ordinance prohibits a medical marijuana dispensary within 1,000 feet of another dispensary, residential district, school, licensed day care center or other building used to care or instruct children under age 18, church or house of worship, or any public or municipal park.

The proposed ordinance also defines a dispensary as a facility where two or more "primary caregivers" grow, cultivate, store, dispense or offer marijuana for sale to qualifying patients' under Michigan's medical marijuana law adopted in 2008.

That would impose the law's zoning limitations on two people who work together to grow or offer marijuana to a single person or just a few people.

"They are trying to hurt the little guy," said Chris Brunett, a wheelchair user with cerebral palsy, who was raised by Vanlandeghem.

Commissioners deferred action on the ordinance until a public hearing, tentatively set for March 2 at the township hall.

Commission Chairman Ray Curtin instructed Keith Pyles, township building inspector and zoning administrator, to check to see if the distance restriction is practical.

A zoning ordinance approved in January by the Grand Blanc Township Board sets the distance from similar places at 500 feet.

Michael Gildner, township attorney, emphasized that planners have to legislate within the state law.

"All we are talking about is where it ( a dispensary ) is located," he said.

A visibly upset Vanlandeghem charged that the current language of the ordinance would provoke a complaint by the American Ciivil Liberties Union.

"The person you are hurting is the patient," he said.

Planner Bob Irrer sympathized with the spirit of the state medical marijuana law.

"My wife died with cancer," he said. "If I could have given her this, don't you think I would have?"

Whatever version of the ordinance planners approve must be adopted by the Township Board to become law in Richfield Township.


NewsHawk: User: http://www.420magazine.com/
Source: Flint Journal (MI)
Copyright: 2010 Flint Journal
Contact: The Flint Journal - Letters to the Editor
Website: Flint, MI Local News, Breaking News, Sports & Weather - MLive.com
Author: George Jaksa

[hg1231]

Way to go MI. Enact a law and slap the face of any one who tries to use it by setting so many restrictions that it is almost impossible to use the law as written. SHAME on the MI government for it's use of double talk, double say. And Double SHAME on Richfield Township.

[nitetime]

Any of the gov. that oppose,vote them out! They have gone against the people,they say one thing and then get in office and do another.LIAR'S