Will 59 Million More Americans Get Access To Marijuana In 2016?

Jacob Redmond

Well-Known Member
Marijuana advocates have been gaining momentum in states that have yet to legalize marijuana, but supporters and those interested in the legalization efforts are undeniably watching most closely to see what happens in California and Florida.

Those two states have different histories when it comes to their stance on marijuana, but both are likely to have marijuana bills on their ballots in 2016, and if those bills pass, then roughly 59 million Americans could enjoy greater access to marijuana by the end of next year.

Once on the cutting edge

California was one of the first states to relax regulations relating to marijuana possession, and in 1996, it was at the forefront of reform when it passed the Compassionate Use Act, a bill that allowed for the possession of a small amount of pot if it was recommended by a physician.

Yet despite its early leadership in marijuana reform, California hasn't taken the next step and legalized recreational use of marijuana.

It came close to approving a bill, Proposition 19, that would legalize marijuana in 2010; however, that ballot initiative fell short at the polls. Once the votes were cast, 53.5% of Californians voted no, while 46.5% voted yes.

Proposition 19 would have given local government the opportunity to regulate various legal marijuana activities, including the possession of up to one ounce for personal use, and to tax marijuana accordingly. At the time, estimates pegged the estimated revenue that could be collected via taxes as high as $1.4 billion.

Although Californians opted against Proposition 19 five years ago, the margin of victory was small. That could clear the way toward a win in 2016, especially given that polls increasingly show that Americans, and Californians in particular, are warming up to the idea of legal cannabis.

According to a poll by Gallup, 51% of Americans now favor some form of legalization, and in California, a record 54% of residents favor ending marijuana prohibition as of June, according to the Public Policy Institute of California.

Even more encouraging for marijuana supporters living in the Golden State is that the percentage of pro-marijuana residents climbs to 56% among those most likely to vote in California's upcoming election. If marijuana supporters do end up following through and voting to approve legalizing recreational marijuana in California next year, then it would impact 39 million Americans.

Inching its way forward

Unlike California, Florida has historically been reticent to embrace easier access to marijuana. It wasn't until last year that it took up the issue of legalizing medical marijuana on its ballot.

Unfortunately, Floridians supporting medical marijuana failed to show enough force for the measure to receive the 60% vote necessary to change the state's constitution in 2014.

Instead, the effort fell shy of success by about 2% and although that was a disappointing blow for marijuana advocates, that small margin of failure offers hope that Florida will pass similar legislation next year. That prospect is backed by the fact that marijuana supporters tend to be younger voters who likely skip mid-term elections but show up for presidential elections.

Marijuana supporters are also buoyed by results from a recent Florida poll showing that two-thirds of Florida voters are inclined to vote in favor of medical marijuana, according to St. Pete Polls. That's an encouraging finding, but supporters might want to temper their enthusiasm given that polls favored legalization last year as well yet legislation still failed to pass.

Regardless, if medical marijuana does get the green light in Florida in 2016, then the nearly 20 million Americans living in the sunshine state may benefit.

Tying it together

Conservatives generally argue against marijuana legalization and efforts funded by conservatives, such as the successful anti-marijuana campaign Drug Free Florida waged in Florida last year by Sheldon Adelson, will likely begin in earnest once the calendar flips to January 1.

If marijuana supporters in California and Florida hope to overcome those anticipated anti-marijuana efforts, national polls suggest that they'll need to coordinate their efforts in a bid to get more Democrats, moderates, and libertarians to the polls. Overwhelmingly, those groups tend to favor marijuana legalization.

If advocates succeed in convincing voters of the merits of regulating and taxing legal marijuana in both of these states, it could tilt the balance in other states because the tens of millions of people living in California and Florida represent nearly 20% of the U.S. population.

21998.jpg


News Moderator: Jacob Redmond 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Will 59 Million More Americans Get Access To Marijuana In 2016?
Author: Todd Campbell
Contact: Contact the MF
Photo Credit: None Found
Website: Motley Fool
 
This is an encouraging article about marijuana legalization although it would be a good idea for present day pro marijuana legalization advocates for initiatives such as the ResponsibleOhio Issue 3 on the November Ohio ballot to review the history of the failed 2010 California Proposition 19 aka "Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010." Here is a link to the text of California's 2010 failed Proposition 19.

Here is a link for access to more information about this failed initiative.
California Proposition 19, the Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2010) - Ballotpedia

The reason I advocate going back and reviewing the history of the failed 2010 California Proposition 19 is because it is a fascinating story full of intrigue, infighting, self interest / special interest actions and downright hardball political maneuvering behind the scenes that resulted in the failure of Proposition 19 to pass. If you read the text of Proposition 19 (first link) I think you will agree with me there is nothing objectionable in there with regard to present day pro marijuana advocates. Proposition 19 SEC 5 provided a method for expanding the concept of marijuana legalization although it failed to pass mainly due to the established special interest medical marijuana group unwillingness to allow others to compete for possession and manufacture of marijuana. Here is the text of SEC 5.
"SEC. 5. Amendment.
Pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 10 of Article II of the California Constitution, this act may be amended either by a subsequent measure submitted to a vote of the people at a statewide election; or by statute validly passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor, but only to further the purposes of the act. Such permitted amendments include, but are not limited to:
(a) Amendments to the limitations in Section 11300 of the Health and Safety Code, which limitations are minimum thresholds and the Legislature may adopt less restrictive limitations.
(b) Statutes and authorized regulations to further the purposes of the act to establish a statewide regulatory system for a commercial cannabis industry that addresses some or all of the items referenced in Sections 11301 and 11302 of the Health and Safety Code.
(c) Laws to authorize the production of hemp or nonactive cannabis for horticultural and industrial purposes."

I repeat, it should be a lesson learned and taken to heart that there are forces operating against this November's ResponsibleOhio ballot Issue 3 every bit as deceptive and self serving as operated in California leading up to the failed 2010 Proposition 19.

Vote YES for Ohio Ballot Issue 3 this November.
 
The Majority of voters want legalization, but not that many want Big Pharma- Government involved. When did legalization become about making money, Government control, and Taxes? We want Legalization without all that ! It`s about freedom, not making money. I voted against greedy prop 19 and most of the proposed laws will get my same NO vote. I might vote yes for the CCHI proposed ballot if they get enough signatures this time around. Still parts of that proposed bill I don`t like but it`s about as close to freedom as I think we can expect to achieve. Still allows for money making , but keeps an even playing field between Mom and Pop farmers and Big Industry. It also allows personal growing and protects most other related interests.
 
Back
Top Bottom