![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| International Cannabis News Marijuana News - Updated Daily! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
420 Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,615
![]() |
IN HONOR OF VETERAN'S DAY: CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE REQUESTED TO MANDATE STATE AND LOCAL COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA'S MEDICAL MARIJUANA LAWS, NOT FEDERAL PROHIBITION
After 2,000+ fallen American soldiers and countless more wounded in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in the War on Terror in the name of the rule of law, the California Attorney General's office has been requested to finally comply with the rule of law in the State of California when it comes to medical marijuana. Before the voters of California passed Proposition 215 in 1996 and decriminalized medical marijuana under State law, the most vocal opponent of medical marijuana, then Attorney General Dan Lungren, established an official policy that permits local California peace officers to subject a legitimate medical marijuana patient or caregiver to criminal sanction or prosecution under the color of the federal Controlled Substances Act. Despite a unanimous California Supreme Court opinion in 2002 (People v. Mower), which held that (absent probable cause) peace officers have no discretion to subject qualified persons to criminal sanction or prosecution for a marijuana offense, the Attorney General's office has maintained that it has the discretion to do just that under the color of federal law. To his credit, out-going Attorney General Bill Lockyer has been more moderate than Lungren on the issue. For example, Lockyer is defending Proposition 215 in the lawsuit brought by the rogue counties of San Diego, San Bernardino, and Merced. In that case, Lockyer is arguing that California's medical marijuana laws are not preempted by the Controlled Substances Act. But, even given this proper Proposition 215 argument, the Attorney General's office nevertheless maintains that compliance with Proposition 215 includes the authority to enforce federal prohibition in cases where it is clear that a person is qualified to possess medical marijuana under California law. Incoming Attorney General Jerry Brown, as the State's "top cop," has the duty "to see that the laws of the State are uniformly and adequately enforced." Many cities and counties have dragged their heals when it comes to implementing Proposition 215. Additionally, the policy of letting localities sort it out for themselves has resulted in the unequal protection of California law. In violation of Proposition 215, legitimate medical marijuana patients and caregivers in the State of California, depending upon where they live, in varying degrees, are subject to criminal sanction or prosecution by officers wearing California badges. The bottom line: the California Attorney General's office has not done the job of ensuring compliance with Proposition 215. If there are abuses of Proposition 215, as opponents of medical marijuana often allege, then those abuses are in part due to the failure of the Attorney General to prevent cities and counties from ignoring their duty under California law to implement Proposition 215. Federalism and the Constitution of California make it clear that California voters are in charge of California's resources. Ten years ago, California's voters declared that qualified persons shall not be subject to criminal sanction or prosecution under State law. Peace officers sworn to uphold California law cannot do indirectly what Proposition 215 prevents them from doing directly. Federal authorities "may" be able to enforce federal prohibition in California, but the Attorney General's office must not allow local officers to do the same. The local police cannot exercise discretion that they do not have. They cannot spend California tax dollars on investigation and enforcement actions that criminalize conduct the State of California does not consider to be criminal. The men and women who put their lives on the line for our security do so by swearing to uphold the United States Constitution. This sacred document includes the 9th and 10th Amendments, which protects the right of the States and of the People, respectively, to, among other things, pass an initiative that differs from federal law. Not arresting someone or seizing their medical marijuana is not a federal crime. The Honorable Jerry Brown, as the next Attorney General of the State of California, needs to stand up and protect the taxpayers of California. The voters called for California's peace officers to "stand down" in the federal war on drugs when it comes to medical marijuana. The rule of law requires that their call be defended. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 0
![]() |
Well Said!
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|