WHY THE JUDGE IS GUILTY - BY ED ROSENTHAL

Breyer did me no favors throughout the trial. He acted as the prosecutor, not
as a judge. The reason was that he came into court with an agenda, to get me
convicted even if he had to twist and bend the laws and courtroom procedures
to get it.

Here are a list of his errors.:
1.)When he found that the prosecutor had lied to the grand jury to get an
indictment-the judge said it was harmless. That's just not true- the jury
wouldn't have indicted without those lies.

2.)When we had DEA Agent Pickett trapped in a vise of his lies- the judge
stopped the questioning so that he would not be discredited.

3.)The judge refused to allow us to use 885(d) the immunity clause after he
said that a literal reading of this federal law would exonerate me.

4.)Against precedent he refused to let us use estoppal as a defense. Under
this concept a citizen is exonerated if he has been told that the action is
legal by a government official with the authority to do so, as happened in
this
case.

5.)He tampered with the jury by removing people who had strong feelings about
215 or states rights even though he declared that these were not issues in
the case.

6.)When juror members admitted that they acted improperly by seeking a
lawyer's advice, the judge declared it harmless error, although one juror
said it
influenced their vote.

7.)The judge took over direct examination of our witness not allowing my
attorney to develop theories that he wished to.

8.)The judge improperly interrupted the defense closing argument.

This judge acted more like a prosecutor than a referee of the facts. He was
biased and prejudiced, not impartial during the entire proceeding. The
sentencing was a result of publicity and public pressure. For the judge it
was a case
of "you better be careful about what you wish for- you just might get it". The
conviction he pushed for placed him in a difficult position- so he punted.

On the other hand, his sentencing of me was a sugar coated poison pill. With
this sentence he explicitly precluded future defendants from attempting to use
any of the defenses that were excluded from being heard at the trial. These
included 9th and 10th amendments, the Commerce Clause of the Constitution,
federal immunity, and lesser harm.

It would have been hypocritical of me to thank the judge for handing me three
felonies to further his personal or political agenda. It would also have been
the end of the story... and they lived happily ever after. The judge would
have basked in the light as a person with Solomonic wisdom. That's just hasn't
happened. Eventually the public will see that he has taken the robes of honor
and turned them into stained rags.

Ed