![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| International Cannabis News Marijuana News - Updated Daily! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
News Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 13,805
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Legislation approved on a party-line vote by a House committee Tuesday placed a target on the back of Kansans who depend on state public assistance and engage in illegal drug use.
The state should no longer ignore people who view cash assistance from the state as a subsidy for the purchase of marijuana and other illegal substances, said Rep. Brenda Landwehr, a Wichita Republican and chairwoman of the House Health and Human Services Committee. “We have a fiduciary duty to taxpayers,” she said. “I’ve been in favor of this legislation.” The GOP-led committee amended House Bill 2275 to attach drug testing to people involved in four programs providing cash assistance and operated by Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services would be subjected to random drug screening. The testing mandate would cover about 14,000 people in the Temporary Assistance for Families, General Assistance, Child Care Assistance and Grandparents as Caregivers Assistance programs. “I don’t think it would work well,” said Wichita Rep. Geraldine Flaharty, who joined with other Democrats on the committee to oppose the bill. SRS Secretary Don Jordan, who endorsed the reform, said about one-third of participants in the state programs would be tested annually. He expects 3 percent to 8 percent to fail drug tests, and the majority of those positive readings would be for marijuana. Anyone caught consuming an illegal drug would be referred to an education or treatment program, Jordan said. Failure to complete the program would result in termination of public assistance. People who finish the required program would be tested periodically. A second positive test would cut off public assistance. Rep. Scott Schwab, R-Olathe, said the bill properly offered Kansans an opportunity to quit using illegal drugs before removed from public assistance rolls. Jordan said SRS would give people advance warning of an upcoming test, perhaps as much as seven days notice. SRS will need to write regulations for managing the program, grapple with potential legal objections to the mandate and identify a series of clinics for people to deliver samples for testing. He said transportation issues could arise for some people on cash assistance. “You can’t expect them to drive 150 miles to take a drug test,” he said. Amendments to the bill sponsored by Rep. Kasha Kelley, R-Arkansas City, deleted a testing requirement for alcohol and exempted from review people enrolled in federally financed programs offering food and medical aid. In addition, a provision of Kelley’s bill that would finance SRS testing with proceeds from drug seizures was dropped. The bill was amended by the committee to delay implementation until July 2010, and the Legislature would have to allocate $800,000 annually to pay for the testing program. Rep. Jim Ward, D-Wichita, said the state would be better served by abandoning Kelley’s bill and devoting that money to providing health care to uninsured children. News Hawk: User: http://www.420magazine.com/ Source: cjonline.com Author: Tim Carpenter Copyright: 2009 Topeka Capitol Journal Contact: timothy.carpenter@cjonline.com Website: Bill mandates drug screening | CJOnline.com
__________________
420 Magazine News Team Creating Cannabis Awareness Since 1993 http://www.420Magazine.com The JACK HERER DONATION FUND - Donations may be deposited at any US BANK Submit a News Article or Event Follow us on Twitter Posting Guidelines Submit your best high resolution photos to photos@420magazine.com for publication in 420 Magazine's print edition. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
420 Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Marijuanaville
Posts: 1,102
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is just the way they try to maintain control. Try to get people suckered into little programs that look on the surface like they would be good for the public welfare and then in a couple years they dropped the hammer. All drug testing should be stopped.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
420 Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: d-town
Posts: 576
![]() |
if not a bad idea if there use to search for harder drugs.
__________________
we must go through hell to know the true beauty of heaven. "if what you keep holds truth inside, stand up defend, or lay down and die." P.O.D. "How infinitesimal is the importance of anything I do, but how infinitely important it is that I do it." --Voltaire ![]() *disclaimer: i am crazy Last edited by 420 Girl; 03-20-2009 at 05:48 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Grow Support
|
If they give 7 day warnings then the only drug they are really looking for is cannabis. All others can be out of the system within 7 days. That's discrimination IMO.
__________________
420 Magazine-Grow Support How to Grow Cannabis Visit Our Sponsors Posting Guidelines Support 420 Magazine How to Post and Resize Pics Submit your best high resolution photos to photos@420magazine.com for publication in 420 Magazine's print edition. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
![]() |
If they give 7 day warnings then the only drug they are really looking for is cannabis.
No, they are looking for the hard cores that can't stop. Pot smokers could flush themselves in 7 dyas if they stopped...IF THEY STOPPED! Just like jukies they can't stop for the 3 days you need to in order to get clean. You are mostly sane, so you won't believe, but I was a junkie once, sometimes you just can't quit, even for 3 days
Last edited by Soniq420; 04-13-2009 at 09:55 AM. |
||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#7 | ||
|
420 Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Marijuanaville
Posts: 1,102
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Virtually all drug testing should be stopped for the simple reason its unconstitutional.
If a business owner has reasonable suscpicion that an employee is under the influence of a drug at work then he should be able to order a drug test. Then the employee can have the choice of either taking the test or quitting. No pre-employements, no randoms. There has to be reasonable cause. |
||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|