Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By Julie Gardener

Thread: Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012

  1. #1
    420 Member Julie Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,031

    Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012

    Court Judge James P. Gray believes the time has come to take marijuana out of the black market and regulate it instead. After years of witnessing the harm caused by outlawing marijuana, Judge Gray will file a voter initiative this Wednesday with the California Attorney General’s office that will regulate marijuana like wine.

    A press conference has been scheduled for 11AM in front of the AG’s office at 1300 I Street. Also present at the press conference will be the initiative’s principle author and chief counsel, William McPike, as well as the chief officer for the campaign, Steve Kubby.

    “Our policy of marijuana prohibition has failed from every standpoint imaginable: unnecessary prison growth, increased taxes, increased crime and corruption here and abroad, loss of civil liberties, decreased health, and diversion of resources that are needed to address other problems in society,” Gray said.

    Gray added that he is especially concerned about the disastrous effects of outlawing marijuana on families and kids, effects he has witnessed for himself as a judge and federal prosecutor. “Far from protecting our children, our present policy is actually recruiting them to a lifestyle of drug usage and drug selling,” charged Gray.

    The former Orange County judge will file a new voter initiative that will regulate and tax marijuana like wine, keep it from those under 21 years of age and provide for billions of new dollars in state sales tax from the regulated sales of marijuana. Recently, the Franchise Tax Board reported that state taxes just from medical marijuana dispensaries now amounts to over $100 million per year.

    When challenged over the wisdom of allowing for sales to adults 21 and older, Gray has no doubts that it is time to regulate marijuana and take it out of the black market. “Many things in our society are dangerous, but making them illegal is not the answer. Does anyone really believe that making tobacco illegal would reduce the harm it causes? What about glue, gasoline, chain saws and high cholesterol foods? Further, if you think about it, we have at least some controls with regard to the sales and use of alcohol and tobacco, because they are regulated by the government. We have no controls at all with marijuana, because it is currently controlled by the mob,” Gray emphasized.



    The People of the State of California do enact as follows:

    The Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012


    SECTION 1. Findings, Declarations, Purpose, Directives, and Orders

    New Section 11362.95 is added to the Health and Safety Code:

    11362.95. This section shall be known as and may be cited as the "Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012," known hereinafter as the "Act."

    (a) The People of the State of California hereby find and declare:

    (1) Outlawing marijuana has not reduced its availability and has actually resulted in making it easier for minors to acquire.

    (2) Marijuana is an untapped revenue source for the State of California, and that the best way to tap into that source for the benefit of all Californians is to tax and regulate it.

    (3) The regulation of marijuana will benefit the People of the State of California by reducing criminal gang activity, promoting agriculture, creating jobs by creating a new hemp industry in the State of California, and reduce the fiscal and overpopulation burdens on the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

    (b) The purposes of this Act are as follows:

    (1) To amend the California Health and Safety Code sections 11357, 11358, 11359, 11360(a), 11366, 11366.5, and (b), 11485, and Vehicle Code section 23222(b), such that persons 21 years of age or older shall no longer be prohibited from the use, possession, trade, gifting, sales, distribution, storage, transportation, production, or cultivation of marijuana.

    (2) Marijuana, THC, and CBD explicitly and/or by inference, shall be removed from Health and Safety Code section 11054, except for those statutes pertaining to:

    (A) Operating a motor vehicle;

    (B) Using marijuana or being impaired in the workplace or public nonsmoking areas.

    (C) Providing, transferring, or selling marijuana to a person under 21 years of age; and

    (D) The use, possession, cultivation, processing, sales, distribution, transporting, or storing on premises of marijuana by persons under 21 years of age.

    (3) The amendment of statutes that criminalize the use, possession, cultivation, processing, transportation, storage, distribution, gifting and/or selling of marijuana in any form, or method of ingestion by persons 21 years of age or older, to legalize all such for-profit or non-profit activity by those persons, groups, or by approved business entities, and does not subject these persons/entities to search, arrest, prosecution, seizure, asset forfeiture, and/or any criminal or civil penalty or sanction.

    (4) That these enumerated activities are not punishable herein.

    (5) That all pending court actions under said amended statutes that conflict with the provisions of this Act shall be dismissed with prejudice.

    (c) The People of the State of California hereby declare that this Act expressly prohibits the following:

    (1) The search, arrest, prosecution, seizure of marijuana, asset forfeiture, or imposition of any criminal or civil penalties or fines for persons 21 years of age or older or entities for acting within the provisions of this Act. Without limiting any other greater immunity or rights granted herein, these persons/entities are also granted the immunity specified in Health and Safety Code section 11367, subject to its provisions.

    (2) Any and all commercial advertising of the sales, distribution, and use of marijuana, except for medical marijuana and products that contain less than one percent THC. This provision shall be enforced hereafter by penalties to be set forth by the Legislature.

    (d) The People of the State of California hereby expressly declare that this Act does not repeal, modify, or change any present medical marijuana statutes as set forth in California Proposition 215 and its progeny.

    (e) The People of the State of California hereby declare:

    (1) This Act adopts the definitions of marijuana and THC as they are presently set forth in Health and Safety Code Sections 11018 and 11006.5, but those definitions shall be broadly interpreted to include the species Cannabis Indica, Ruderalis, and Americana, as well as any plant part, derivative, interspecies hybrids or cross-breeds, and all non-genetically-modified strains of the Cannabis genus and plant.

    (2) Existing taxes and regulations for the establishment of the farming, industry, distribution, retail sales, and wholesale transactions of agricultural crops and products shall apply to marijuana, regardless of THC level, using the grape winery industry as a model, so long as the results support these declarations, purposes and goals.

    (3) All marijuana or hemp products with a THC level below one percent, shall be authorized for normal retail sales. All marijuana or hemp products with a THC level of one percent or above shall be restricted for normal retail sales to persons 21 years of age or older and carefully regulated in a manner similar to wine, so long as the results support these declarations, purposes and goals.

    (4) The State of California, and all branches of its government, shall liberally construe the meaning and implementation of this Act to favor and benefit individuals, and qualifying business entities regarding the following:

    (A) No taxes, fees, laws, rules, regulations, or local city or county zoning requirements may be adopted or enacted to defeat, deny, or prohibit the purposes of this Act, or to defeat, deny, or prohibit these persons 21 years of age or older, associations, commercial, agricultural, or industrial businesses from engaging in the activities protected by this Act, and all civil rights apply as set forth in Civil Code Sections 52.1 et seq., 54, Food and Agricultural Code Sections 54033 through 54035, inclusive.

    (B) As per the winery regulations of the alcohol industry model that allow for non-commercial home brewing, any person, association, or collective group not producing more than 25 flowering plants or 12 pounds of dried processed marijuana per adult, per year, shall be exempt from any winery regulations of the alcohol industry model, excises, fees, and taxes, except for income taxes and sales taxes, if they apply.

    (C) No regulations, taxes, or fees shall be enacted or imposed for marijuana for qualifying persons and entities, which are more severe or restrictive than those for comparable and reasonable usage in the commercial wine grape farming and winery regulations of the alcohol industry model, including for farming, planting, cultivating, irrigating, harvesting, processing, brokering, storing, selling, distributing, and establishing of cooperatives or collective associations.

    (5) Regardless of jurisdictional arguments, all state, local, elected, appointed, hired employees, officers, and officials shall refuse to and shall not cooperate with or assist federal, state, or local officials or employees who would eradicate marijuana, act for seizure or forfeiture, or defeat any liberally construed purpose of this Act, or to operate under any contract or arrangement to repeal or circumvent this Act directly or indirectly, or to follow or to abide by any federal laws or regulations that are in conflict with this Act. Further, no such person acting alone, or with any other person or legislative or executive body, may contract or agree to cooperate with or to assist federal officials, employees, agencies or departments to obtain any money, property, gain, or advantage by the arrest, prosecution, conviction, or deprivation or seizure of property of anyone acting within the age provisions of this Act.

    (6) Within 30 days of passage of this Act, the offices of both the state Attorney General and the Department of Public Health shall inform the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Attorney General, Congress, Drug Enforcement Agency and Food and Drug Administration that in 1996 California recognized the current medical use of marijuana in treatment in the United States, and since 1996, and is a state-regulated medical practice. Physicians have evaluated thousands of patients' use which has had no adverse consequences, and for that reason demand or petition as is appropriate (see 21 CFR 1308.43, 21 USC 811-812) that marijuana and tetrahydrocannabinols as defined in 21 USC 802(16) be removed from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 USC 800 et. seq., where it is currently listed as a drug with no accepted medical use.

    (7) The State of California is ordered to protect and defend all provisions of this Act from any and all challenges or litigation, whether from individuals, officials, cities, counties, the state or federal governments.

    (f) In order to protect the public health and safety, the People of the State of California hereby require the state Department of Health to deputize persons who are 21 years of age or older and apply as unpaid, unarmed, volunteer peace officers, hereinafter known as Harm Reduction Officers (HROs), who are required to compel implementation and enforce all provisions of this Act.

    (1) These persons, upon registration and payment of a nonrefundable training and materials fee, not to exceed $200, must complete a minimum of two days training in the following curriculum areas:

    (A) State and federal Cannabis laws and regulations;

    (B) Indoor and outdoor cultivation hazards and safe practices;

    (C) Applicable fire, building, environmental, labor, and safety codes; and

    (D) The state and federal Bills of Rights and appropriate civil rights, including 18 USC §241 and 242 and Civil Code Sections 52.1 et seq., and 54.

    (2) Training shall be privately contracted. Training shall be repeated by HROs every three years, and curriculum updates shall be provided to HROs annually.

    (3) Upon completion of training, a certificate of completion shall be issued to the trainee, who may then take the certificate to any state Department of Health office, law enforcement agency, or to any Superior Court judge, where they shall be deputized as Department of Health peace officers and shall take the oath of office as specified in Article XX, Section 3 of the California Constitution. Upon payment of the processing fee to the Health Department, not to exceed $100, a HRO shall be issued a photo identification card, identical throughout the state.

    (4) The HROs shall be charged with the duty of compelling persons to comply with this Act by informing persons of compliance requirements or perceived violations, and reporting actual uncorrected violations to law enforcement for follow-up action.

    (5) By their status of being peace officers, HROs shall be considered to be in full compliance with both 21 USC §885(d) and Health and Safety Code section 11367, and therefore shall be immune from all state and federal liability and prosecution only for enforcing and operating under the provisions of this Act.

    (6) The training and certification requirements of this paragraph shall be applicable only to HROs, and the provisions of Penal Code sections 832 et seq. shall not apply to HROs or to this paragraph.

    (g) This Act shall become effective immediately upon passage.

    SECTION 2. Severability

    If any of the provisions of this Act, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect, and to this end the provisions of this Act are severable.

    SECTION 3. Conflicting Measures

    If this Act is approved by the voters but superseded by law by any other conflicting ballot measure approved by the voters at the same election, and the conflicting measures are later held invalid, this Act shall be self-executing and given the full force of law.

    Sponsored by the Committee to Regulate Marijuana Like Wine 2012, campaign ID #1336887.

  2. #2
    420 Member medme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Wa.
    Posts
    345

    Re: Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012

    i'll drink to that...........
    its only illegal if you get caught...

    expect the worst,,, you'll never be dissapointed..

  3. #3
    420 Member Julie Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,031

    Re: Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012

    I'm right behind you again medme!!

    Let's go California!!

  4. #4
    New Member Synuae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2

    Re: Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012

    Thanks California for leading this movement. I live in Michigan and hope proposals like this do finally get approved. I am an intelligent, hardworking, taxpaying citizen and its about time that people like myself are not viewed as common criminals. I have only been in trouble with the law twice in my life and both were for misdemeanor marijuana possession less than a half gram of roaches both times. We are only criminals by virtue of short-sighted, uneducated politicians and citizens who would prefer to close their mind's eye to reality and live within their bubble of what THEY believe everyone should be. I am an atheist and it is my believe that religion is more of a danger to our society AND our civil rights than marijuana ever will be, yet I wold not tell people that they cannot worship a God, though I think that religion should NEVER be mentioned EVER in politics nor have any basis on laws, yet it does and is partially a driving factor in why marijuana is still largely criminalized. What we currently have is a law based on naive opinion and that needs to be changed