Pot Perplexes Laws On DUI


Many states that are considering passing or have recently passed laws legalizing marijuana are looking to Colorado — one of the nation’s first legalizers — for guidance.

One of the things they’re asking is how Colorado is managing cannabis-
impaired driving now that pot is legal, and the answer seems to be: Not very well.

Colorado has established a legal driving limit of 5 nanograms of THC, the chemical in cannabis that is responsible for psychoactive impairment, per milliliter of blood sampled. In other words, this 5 ng/mL level of THC is equivalent to the 0.08 percent blood-alcohol concentration driving limit.

But research about the effects of THC on people’s driving and operational abilities is without consensus. Some researchers think Colorado’s limit is far too low, and some think the limit is far too high.

And whatever they think, most experts agree that impairment by cannabis can’t be tested using the same standards as impairment by alcohol.

Research on alcohol and cannabis shows that the two substances have different effects on the brain and body.

For example, alcohol is known as a depressant, which slows brain activity — creating slowed reaction times and slurred speech, among other effects.

Cannabis, though, has psychoactive effects, research shows. It doesn’t so much slow down brain activity as alter it.

But it alters the brain in a way not wholly consistent with other drugs that can be binned as stimulants or hallucinogens. Cannabis defies categorization.

“Marijuana is a weird drug. It doesn’t classify like other drugs,” said Andrew Nolan, a Grand Junction defense lawyer with extensive experience defending those charged with DUIs for high driving.

In Nolan’s courtroom experience, defendants whose blood tested over 5 ng/mL THC upon being pulled over by the cops weren’t necessarily found to be impaired.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) fact sheet on cannabis, based on evidence from more than two dozen scientific studies of the drug, lists “disorientation, altered time and space perception, lack of concentration, impaired learning and memory, alterations in thought formation and expression, drowsiness, sedation” and “mood changes,” among several others, as possible effects of marijuana consumption.

But if a person is pulled over on suspicion of impaired driving, he will receive the same roadside tests whether suspected of being stoned or drunk, said Colorado State Patrol Trooper Josh Lewis. Think walking a straight line or standing on one foot.

Another complicating difference between testing drivers for cannabis versus for alcohol is that, according to research collated in the National Institutes of Health, a person’s THC level can vary greatly depending on how the cannabis was consumed — smoked or eaten, for example — and how often the person consumes it.

One study found THC concentrations over the legal limit remained in frequent marijuana smokers’ blood three times longer than in occasional smokers.

Further, THC is absorbed differently than alcohol, moving out of the blood into fatty tissues after consumption and lingering there, so traces of THC in cannabis users can stick around for weeks and don’t reliably correlate with a person’s immediate state of mind.

“It is difficult to establish a relationship between a person’s THC blood or plasma concentration and performance impairing effects,” the NHTSA’s fact sheet reads, adding that the concentration of THC found in an individual’s blood after consumption is “very dependent on pattern of use as well as dose.”

Nolan’s experience with clients supports these scientific findings.

“People develop such remarkable tolerances to cannabis,” Nolan said.

And he finds the jurors hearing his cases tend to understand this and pay more attention to functional evidence of a defendant’s driving ability, such as speeding or swerving, rather than the hard blood test numbers.

Conversely, for defendants charged with an alcohol-related DUI, the jurors tend to pay more heed to the numbers rather than the driver’s behaviors.

“It’s almost like there needs to be a series of tests or evaluating components that are unique to marijuana,” said Nolan, echoing the thoughts of many drug researchers across the nation.

Some of these researchers are working on innovative roadside impairment tests that specifically address impairments related to THC.

A psychologist at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, for example, has developed an application called DRUID for a portable tablet computer that is supposed to more accurately determine marijuana-based impairment. The app utilizes user interaction to measure “errors in decision-making, motor tracking and balance,” among other issues, according to the app designer’s website.

It might be a while before such revolutionary changes in DUI assessments as DRUID make it into patrol officers’ hands, but the app is already available to the public. At least cautious drivers can test themselves before they get behind the wheel.

News Moderator: Ron Strider 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Pot perplexes laws on DUI | GJSentinel.com
Author: Kelly Slivka
Contact: http://www.gjsentinel.com/staff
Photo Credit: Justin Sullivan
Website: GJSentinel.com – Grand Junction breaking news, sports, opinion, entertainment and multimedia


  1. While I agree that we should be looking to prevent unsafe driving when and where we can, these limits and tests are as much about profit and appearance, as there are keeping anyone safe. Most long terms users are more distracted by NOT having cannabis in their system than they are with having >5ng. In other words, if I’m driving while OFF my medication. The last thing we need is for the solution to again find problems where there aren’t. By the time the case law catches up, the cars will drive themselves – is this really where we want to spend our time and money… destroying lives over soft and ambiguous science?

    CO got it 100% wrong when it comes to DUI.

  2. My understanding of the research, backed up by personal experience, is that people who are somewhat stoned become BETTER drivers than they are when straight. Stoners are more attentive, drive more slowly and carefully, and time dilation effects give them better reaction times. Obviously this is not the case with excessive consumption as can easily occur with edibles, but if ‘the authorities’ wanted to actually achieve a higher level of road safety they should PROVIDE weed to drivers and ENCOURAGE them to drive with a little buzz on. Insurance companies should lower premiums for those promising to drive stoned, too. Habitual speeders, tailgaters, road ragers, and other unsafe drivers should have THC breathalyzer interlocks installed on their cars by court order, requiring some minimal THC blood concentration, in order to chill them down and make them pay better attention to their driving. And we’d all be a lot safer on the road for it.

    But of course we all know ‘the authorities’ (think ignorant ‘christian’ redneck bigot Jeff Sessions for example) want to PUNISH people for using cannabis and will manufacture any excuse they can get away with to do so, and THAT is why rationality is not likely to be seen from them anytime soon. It is going to take years of evidence-gathering in the form of scientific research to prove what are today initial findings of the BENEFITS of driving a little stoned, and probably decades of bureaucratic foot-dragging before they start doing the smart thing — just as it’s taken so many decades for cannabis to start becoming legal in many states.