Australia: Marijuana Laws

[Jim Finnel]

The cultivation, possession, use and supply of cannabis is illegal throughout Australia as is its importation.

Some states have moved towards decriminalising the possession of small quantities of cannabis for personal use or the diversion of offenders to education or treatment programs. Offenders in South Australia, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory may be issued with an infringement. In Victoria, first time minor offenders are cautioned and referred to drug education, while Western Australia combines both methods by allowing those apprehended with less than 30g of cannabis or two cannabis plants grown at home the opportunity of paying a fine or attending an education session.

Source: Australian Institute of Criminology

 

[Jim Finnel]

Re: Australia Marijuana Laws

CANNABIS IN CONTEXT: HISTORY, LAWS AND INTERNATIONAL TREATIES

The impact of drug use in the 1960s has been well-documented and was an international phenomenon. But until this time, drug use was not viewed as a widespread social problem in Australia - rather as contained and containable. The consumption of drugs such as morphine, pethidine, opium and heroin by dependent users was chiefly confined in Australia to those with a dependence that was therapeutic in its origins or to minority groups - for example, very old Chinese members of the community.

In 1960 Australia reported to the Commission on Narcotic Drugs that some Indian hemp use was occurring in the 'theatrical world' (quoted in Manderson 1993, p144). But during the 1960s, the nature and extent of illicit drug use - including the use of cannabis - changed dramatically. It became more widespread, it became matter of choice (rather than 'necessity' through therapeutic dependence), it was embraced by students and youth, and it was associated with changing moral values and practices, alienation, and challenges to societal values and the political order. It brought increasing numbers of otherwise law-abiding Australians into contact with the criminal law, criminal penalties and associated stigmatisation. The use of drugs such as cannabis and heroin came to be regarded both as a symptom of social malaise and a cause of it.

The third phase in the history of Australian drug laws commenced during the 1960s. From that time 'the States began overhauling their drug laws and the Commonwealth became much more actively involved in the field, both by ratifying new conventions and by revising the provisions of the Customs Act' ([50]South Australia 1978, pp35-6). In addition, in response to treaty obligations, the Commonwealth introduced new federal laws on drugs - the Narcotic Drugs Act 1967 was the first of these. At state level, control of recreational drugs was gradually removed from poisons statutes, whose original purpose was to 'regulate and control the supply and distribution of pharmaceuticals and poisons on public health grounds' ([51]Kirby 1992, p315), and placed into special legislation. Drug laws and drug policies from this time onwards can be characterised as follows.

First, a law enforcement approach became firmly entrenched at Commonwealth level with the important role played by Customs, which had no interest in any medical or public health model of drug use or supply.

Second, penalties were increased.

Third, there were changes to basic principles of criminal law - such as reversal of the onus of proof - in order to make convictions easier ([52]Manderson 1993).

Last, there was a shift in legislative emphasis away from drug users to drug traffickers. Both Commonwealth and some State laws distinguished between traffickable quantities of drugs (including cannabis) and amounts deemed as being less than traffickable quantities. For the most part, penalties for cultivation, production and manufacture, possession and use of cannabis, and possession of drug paraphernalia were substantial during the 1960s and 1970s. For example, in South Australia the penalty was $4,000 and/or 10 years imprisonment for knowingly cultivating cannabis (s5(2)(b)) and $2,000 and/or two years imprisonment for knowingly being in possession, using or administering (s5(1)).

Debate about cannabis, research that showed the widespread nature of cannabis use, alarming law enforcement statistics, the work of the early Parliamentary and other inquiries, and difficulties in administering some drug laws, led to the first legislative changes in the middle to late 1970s. These distinguished between simple possession of cannabis and other drugs. The first jurisdiction to change law enforcement practices and then legislation was the Australian Capital Territory. A non-enforcement policy in relation to simple cannabis possession offences was instituted following a number of court cases in which the police failed to secure convictions because the Public Health (Prohibited Drugs) Ordinance did not contain a definition of cannabis.

In 1975, the Ordinance was amended to include a definition of cannabis. At the same time the maximum penalty for possession of less than 25g of cannabis was reduced to $100. Some reforms also occurred in the Northern Territory. Under the Prohibited Drugs Ordinance 1977 (NT), a first offender was liable to a fine of $500; while second or third offences of possession were more heavily penalised, imprisonment was not provided as a sanction. Further legislative change occurred in the 1980s. The Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) contained slightly less severe penalties for cannabis trafficking than for trafficking in other illicit drugs. The Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances (Amendment) Act 1983 set the maximum penalty for possession of less than 50g of cannabis at $500. In addition, s76 of the Act empowered magistrates to award an adjourned bond in certain circumstances in the case of an offence of possession of up to 50g of cannabis. No conviction could be recorded in the case of a first offender. Section 76 applies only to cannabis, not to other drugs, and it does not apply to trafficking offences in respect of any drug.

In South Australia, the Controlled Substances Act was passed in 1984. As originally formulated, the Act distinguished between offences involving cannabis or cannabis resin and offences involving other illicit drugs. The Act proscribed (and still proscribes) the possession, smoking, consumption, administration or self-administration, manufacture, sale or supply of drugs of dependence or prohibited drugs, and the possession of drug paraphernalia. Under the 1984 Act, the penalty for possession, smoking or consumption of small quantities of cannabis or cannabis resin was a maximum of $500. For any other drug of dependence or prohibited drug the maximum penalty was $2,000 and/or two years imprisonment. Similarly, some distinctions were made between cannabis and other drugs in respect of trafficking offences. More significant reforms came in 1986 with the Controlled Substances Act Amendment Act which provided for an expiation notice scheme. The expiation notice scheme commenced operation on 30 April 1987. Section 45a(2) of the Act enables expiation notices to be issued to adults in certain cases - for example, when less than 100g of cannabis or less than 20g of cannabis resin is involved. Notices can be issued in respect of cultivation that is not for commercial purposes, for smoking or consumption of cannabis or cannabis resin except in a public or prescribed place, and for possession of equipment used for the smoking or consumption of cannabis or the preparation of cannabis resin. Payment of the expiation fee before the expiration of 60 days from the date of the notice means that no conviction is recorded against the alleged offender. The fees are $50 for possession of less than 25g of cannabis and $150 for less than 100g of cannabis. In the case of cannabis resin the expiation fees are $50 for possession of less than 5g and $150 for amounts ranging between 5g and less than 20g of resin. Cultivation of 10 plants or less incurs a fine of $150. It should be noted that at the same time that the cannabis expiation notice system was introduced, amendments to the Act also substantially increased penalties for trafficking offences. In addition, amendments to the Controlled Substances Act in 1990 provide severe penalties for offences such as sale, supply and administration of prohibited drugs and drugs of dependence, including cannabis, to a child.

Although some jurisdictions reformed the law relating to personal consumption of cannabis, heavier penalties were introduced for trafficking offences and a scale of trafficking offences was commonly provided - for example, traffickable, indictable and commercial quantities. Manderson (1993) puts it this way:

The emphasis on Mr Big as an evil in his own right allowed a less severe approach to drug users by removing them from the centrality of drug laws. The harsh penalties imposed on marijuana smokers and other users of drugs could be softened without undermining 'the war on drugs' (p185).

The focus on the Mr Bigs of the drug world has also enabled legislatures to enact drug laws which give extensive powers of search and seizure to the police, and which give considerable powers in relation to the use of listening devices and telephone taps. While some reforms were put in place in the 1970s and 1980s, the picture that emerges nationally is an uneven one.

The Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), for example, distinguishes only between cannabis and other drugs in the case of commercial trafficking. In the case of cannabis the maximum penalty that can be imposed is $500,000 or 20 years imprisonment, or both. For commercial trafficking in any other drugs, a life sentence can be imposed. In New South Wales, possession, administration and self-administration of prohibited drugs, including cannabis, are proscribed, as is the possession of equipment for the administration of prohibited drugs. Personal consumption offences (involving less than five plants or less than 25g of cannabis) make an offender liable to a penalty of $2,000 and/or two years imprisonment. Cultivation, manufacture and production, and supply are prosecuted on indictment. The Drugs Misuse Act 1986 (Qld) assigns dangerous drugs to Schedules under the Act. Drugs like heroin and cocaine appear in the First Schedule and cannabis sativa is listed in the Second Schedule. Offences relate to trafficking (s5), supply (s6), production of dangerous drugs (s8), possession (s9), and possession of drug paraphernalia (s10).

In addition, penalties vary in the case of aggravated supply which is defined in s6(2) of the Act as including supply to a minor, an intellectually handicapped person, and supply in an educational or correctional institution. While there are differences in the statutory penalties applicable to First and Second Schedule drugs, they are minor.

Under the Drugs Misuse Act Amendment Act 1990, the penalty for unlawful trafficking in cannabis carries a penalty of 20 years imprisonment, while for First Schedule drugs the penalty is 25 years (s5). Possession of cannabis carries a penalty of 15 years imprisonment, or 20 years imprisonment if the quantity equals or exceeds 500g or 100 plants (s9). The penalty for possession of drug paraphernalia is imprisonment for two years. Offenders may be fined in addition to or instead of being imprisoned (s54) and may be prosecuted summarily for minor offences (s13).

In 1989 the Australian Capital Territory remodelled its drug control legislation, and the Drugs of Dependence Ordinance was introduced with the idea of it being used as a model for all other jurisdictions. The Act establishes two classes of drug:
prohibited drugs which are subject to special treatment. (According to the Act's Explanatory Statement, prohibited drugs have no medical use and are harmful for recreational purposes); and
drugs of dependence, which are distinguished from prohibited drugs in the Explanatory Statement, in that they are said to have a medical use.

The Act defines cannabis, cannabis fibre, cannabis oil, cannabis plants and cannabis resin. Schedule 2 to the Act lists cannabis, cannabis oil and cannabis resin as prohibited drugs and defines commercial and traffickable quantities of the drug. In addition, cannabis is listed in Schedule 5 as a prohibited plant.1

The Act makes clear distinctions between personal use activities and trafficking. It reserves extremely harsh penalties for the latter and contains deeming provisions. It also makes distinctions in penalties between cannabis and other prohibited drugs. Cultivation of prohibited plants, including cannabis, is an offence (s162(2)), as is cultivation for the purposes of sale or supply (s162(3)), sale or supply, or possession for sale or supply (s165(1)). Possession, self-administration and administration of cannabis are offences under s171.

The harshest penalties are reserved for sale or supply of commercial quantities of cannabis - life imprisonment (s165), and cultivation of more than 1,000 plants - life imprisonment (s162(3)).

In the Northern Territory, the Misuse of Drugs Act 1990 prescribes a penalty of $2,000 or two years imprisonment for administering cannabis. Possession of less than a traffickable quantity 'attracts penalties ranging from a $10,000 fine to imprisonment for 14 years; possession of a commercial quantity attracts penalties ranging from 14 to 25 years imprisonment. The penalties for cultivation offences also depend on the quantity cultivated; commercial quantities carry a 25-year prison term; traffickable quantities carry a seven-year prison term; and other cases attract a penalty of a fine of $5,000 or imprisonment for two years' (Australian Capital Territory 1991, p35).

Like Queensland, Northern Territory legislation creates separate offences and penalties in respect of supplying illicit drugs to children. In the Northern Territory, the penalty is 25 years or imprisonment for life (s5). Offences and penalties relating to illicit drugs are covered by the Poisons Act 1971 and the Criminal Code in Tasmania, and in Western Australia by the Misuse of Drugs Act 1981.

In the Australian Capital Territory, changes to the law on cannabis were introduced by the Drugs of Dependence (Amendment) Act 1992. These amendments were by no means as far-reaching as those envisaged by the Legislative Assembly's Select Committee on HIV, Illegal Drugs and Prostitution (outlined earlier) which recommended the removal of personal possession offences involving small amounts of cannabis. However, the amendments do introduce an expiation notice scheme that applies to both adults and juveniles (s171A). Under the amendments, a simple cannabis offence is defined as: * an offence under s162(2) of cultivating or participating in the cultivation of not more than five cannabis plants; * an offence under s171(1) of possessing not more than 25g of cannabis. A police officer is empowered to serve an offence notice on a person believed to have committed a simple cannabis offence. If the prescribed penalty of $100 is paid within 60 days, then the offence is discharged and no conviction is recorded. The prescribed penalty of $100 is the same as that previously applying under the Act for possession of small amounts of cannabis.

Drug law reform is still an active issue for some Australians. In 1993, interest in drug laws and social policy resulted in the establishment of an Australian Parliamentary Group on Drug Law Reform - a group whose membership includes current and former politicians from different political parties and a range of jurisdictions, medical practitioners, researchers and members of the legal profession. Among the short-term goals being considered by the Committee are the rejection of criminal sanctions for personal use of drugs and the nationwide adoption of an expiation scheme model for personal use of cannabis ([53]Van Raay 1993).
Source

 

[AnaHinola]

Re: Australia Marijuana Laws

Why don’t the go for a legal advice for cultivation of cannabis if it’s illegal throughout Australia, and try to cultivate it as per Australian law.

 

[Peete]

Thank you for an informative read. I am hoping for Aus to relax it's cannabis laws. My wife has skin cancer and has been attending clinics for the last 10 years. Me my memory is fading I have diabetes and heart disease.

By thye way it seem that Canberra has the most leanent laws for cannabis. Hmm to many politicians kids getting locked up maybe.

Geez I'm a cynicle, but who could blame me

 

[Besmirched1]

Just read today Victoria has a report recommending the laws follow Cali and Colorado. Will try to find link and post.

Happy days ahead my friends.

 

[PapaSmurfAU]

not the actual report but here is a link
Parliamentary Report Offers Clear Roadmap for Fixing Drug Problems - Fionapatten
Australia has a habit in following the USA so I'm betting at some stage it will happen. It seems to take us about 20 or so years to adapt. Correct me if I'm wrong But the first recreational legalization in the states was in 2016. So we have up to another 18 years to catch up. The cost savings on prescription drugs that are on the PBS and Less frivolous policing and court cases will save us a fortune and will be undeniable. On top of this a whole new industry will emerge.
The U.S. legal marijuana industry is booming
9 Billion in sales in 2017 in the US. Seriously how much longer can we afford not to? I did read somewhere that the amount of money spent by the Australian Government in the last 12 month on prohibition could have sent every child in this country to a private school education. Not sure if that is true but it wouldn't surprise me.

 

[Besmirched1]

Unfortunately I saw this today by the Greens, following state controlled marijuana laws in Uruguay which would mean highly controlled and regulated industry.
I for one think that the organic seed banker at home out of the way will be the more valuable.

Greens want to legalise cannabis for all adults

 

[PapaSmurfAU]

One of the things that seems to have happened in the US is the industry that has sprung up around the legalisation. You have people selling everything from hydro gear to organic soils and nutes along with all the other stuff that goes along with it. It has made the industry come of age and has entrapreneureal people becoming wealthy. I'd love to know the exact figure of how many people the industry employs through dispenceries accessories and growing goods and even restaurants and eateries. Not to mentioned. Vapes and other parapheralia. By strictly regulating the industry, the government gets to say who makes the cash. You can bet any licensing will be extremely difficult to get and corruption will be rife in saying who these people are. While we want to see a free market the sad reality is with a nanny state like Australia, its probably the best we can hope for.

 

[Besmirched1]

Worse than that the Uruguay system wouldn't allow outside growing, monies taken from tax and revenue, and we would still be illegally growing but now the penalties would be like for tobacco.
Hope we don't head the way the Greens want us to go.

 

[PapaSmurfAU]

Are you talking outdoor grow as in natural sunlight? Because the way I read it you will be able to grow 6 plants after some sort of registration process.

 

[Besmirched1]

But what seed will you be allowed to use? A government agency will insist we use Monsanto seed as they have up here in Tolga FNQ.

Sorry very cynical, non compliant personality. If that is not the case I'd be all for it, having said that though... I believe seed bankers and home growers repressed for years having the opportunity to market their wares.

What needs to be done once this is in Parliament is for us to hound our MP's and senators during the submission process. Maybe an Aussie thread, will keep an eye for Parliament details and post links if I can.

 

[PapaSmurfAU]

Agreed. I'm all for a level playing field with the least amount of regulation. But when I can be fined for riding my pushbike without a helmet, I have to say that I have zero confidence in the Australian government at any level to progress to anything that resembles a free market. But I will be there lobbying my local member and the state minister involved.

 

[Besmirched1]

Totally agree with you there Papa, I and many I know have no confidence in the governmental system or in the politician's. I suppose atleast the bills are being written and discussed and we have a chance to force them to listen to reason.... Maybe

Do we have any members who have been through the USA process in Senate etc and could help with a semi standard submission for Senate?

 

[Jungle666]

Can anyone tell me how many plants you can grow in Victoria for a minum penalty,cheers j

 

[wickrdiazo420]

it's funny and disgusting how human beings make laws to destroy other human beings with . No reasonable human being can ban what is good medically . So i say those who placed a Ban on cannabis in the first place are unreasonable . Cancer is staring at us, epilepsy too, HIV, Insomnia and a lot more are watching at us from a distance. I am farmer and will not stop farming a plant that is as old as ancient civilization just because a few individuals felt hate for the plant.
Since when do human beings start to care about other human beings and their health ?.
Hospitals are built with the intention of treating the sick but in reality they are meant to keep you sick and prolong your suffering on this planet.
He who sells Coffins prays for more death so business can keep on booming

 

[crazecollective]

Happy 420 Australia!

 

[slyclone]

Verry old post this is allot has changed over the years. A long way to go still. Stay safe everyone