Canada: Medicinal And Recreational Cannabis Should Be Separate, Say Researchers

Thread starter #1

Ron Strider

News Moderator
Staff member
Two Halifax researchers are urging the federal government to keep medicinal and recreational marijuana streams separate once the plant is legalized in Canada.

The op-ed, published in the latest issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal, was co-authored by Dr. Melanie Kelly, a professor of pharmacology and ophthalmology at Dalhousie University, and Elizabeth Cairns, a PhD candidate studying pharmacology and neuroscience.

Cairns and Kelly support a recommendation, initially proposed by the Liberal government's task force on cannabis legalization and regulation, to keep the two so-called "streams" – medicinal and recreational – separate.

"[Patients] are potentially looking for a totally different product and there's no guarantee with a market that's recreationally driven that that product will be maintained and sold," said Cairns.

CMA recommends 1 stream

Unlike the task force, the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) recommends just one stream once marijuana is legalized, arguing that more research must be conducted on cannabis before it should be approved for widespread medical use.

"We accept that [people] say they have benefited from using cannabis, but there's no or very little research behind that," said Dr. Granger Avery, president of the CMA.

"Until we have research and the real information behind it, we're not in favour of endorsing it for medical intervention."

There are still many regulations being hashed out as Canada prepares to legalize marijuana for recreational use before July 1 of next year.

"With recreational cannabis, what you're looking for is intoxication – that is not necessarily the case for medicinal cannabis," said Cairns, who points out that cannabis is the preferred, clinical term which includes not only the dried marijuana plant but also any extracts derived from the plant, such as cannabis oil.

Decrease the stigma for patients

The piece from Cairns and Kelly argues that a dual-stream approach would not only decrease the stigma surrounding medical cannabis, but would benefit patients in other ways including:

■Protecting the supply of strains of medical cannabis that have desirable effects for patients, such as lower THC strains sometimes used to treat children who suffer from seizures.

■Driving clinical research into therapeutic uses for cannabis.

■Giving health-care providers the incentive to be up to date on the latest research involving therapeutic benefits of cannabis.

Child's seizures reduced 90%

Before Mandy McKnight's nine-year-old son Liam started taking cannabis oil to treat Dravet syndrome, he was having upwards of 80 seizures a day. Since starting treatment, his seizures have reduced by about 90 per cent.

"Sometimes he can go a week, two weeks, without having any seizures at all," said McKnight, whose family lives in Constance Bay, Ont.

She has many concerns if legalization means there is no distinction between medical and recreational cannabis, not the least of which is where it will be sold.

"I'm not going into an LCBO [liquor store] to buy medicine for my kid," she said.

The task force has recommended that marijuana not be sold alongside liquor, but ultimately distribution plans will be up to individual provinces, the federal government has said.

"Most patients want to have different venues for delivery.... They want to have it looking more like a medicine, they're using it for a specific [medical] purpose," said Kelly.

Out-of-pocket costs for patients

Another problem, said McKnight, is the cost. Since cannabis does not have a Drug Identification Number, it can be difficult to get insurance companies to pay for the medication.

McKnight said her family spends $700 or $800 a month on cannabis oil, out of pocket. Previously, they were spending about $2,500 per month on pharmaceuticals that Liam no longer needs because of his cannabis treatment. She said the cost of ambulance fees and hospital stays is also way down.

"I know parents who are getting loans and falling behind on their payments, their bill payments because they need to buy this and there's no coverage, whatsoever, there's nothing," said McKnight.

Kelly said this situation underlines the importance of keeping medicinal cannabis separate, so there are more clinical trials into therapeutic cannabis benefits that may make providing a DIN more palatable to those in the pharmaceutical industry.

"We're already seeing a revolution in terms of the industry. I hear quite a lot and I'm seeing very innovative devices to dose-standardize even dried cannabis, recommending different ways of ingesting like vaporization," said Kelly.

A lot to work out

For its part, the Nova Scotia government recognizes the legalization of marijuana is complicated.

"We'll be looking at both models of delivery – and a lot of complexities as we speak, but working through those. We have a short timeline, July of 2018, so a lot of work to do," said Justice Minister Mark Furey, speaking for the province.

The government said though decisions are still being made at the provincial level, physicians will still have the ultimate say over their patients' care.

"Decisions regarding medicinal marijuana for patients, of any age, are made by physicians and that will continue. This is federally regulated and will be ongoing," said Sarah Gillis, speaking for the Nova Scotia Department of Justice.

News Moderator: Ron Strider 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Medicinal and recreational cannabis should be separate, say researchers - Health - CBC News
Author: Cassie Williams and Sameer Chhabra
Contact: CBC Help Centre
Photo Credit: CBC
Website: CBC News - Latest Canada, World, Entertainment and Business News
I agree 100%
Let all the recreational enthusiasts have their fun next July, but allow us medical patients to continue our unique supply so we too can enjoy all the benefits of a pain free life.
Thanks to the researchers for their hard work and continued support, Liberal government listen!!
Also keep production out of big companies keep it smaller growers, similar to micro breweries to preserve a quality product grown from love and care rather than profits and corporate waste and the race to the bottom.
I agree with hab13, medicinal users such as myself consume marijuana to achieve functionality, thus requiring a variety of strains, to attempt for some normality, and as in my case eliminate the opioids, anti depressants ( all ineffective), and the other drugs to try to counter the side effects, not to mention overdoses... Perhaps the CMA should read the Human right Decision in Nova Scotia, Skinner vs. the Canadian Elevator Board of Trustee's, as well as published articles and studies by Dr. Mark Weir, Dr. Mary Lynch, all of which prescribe marijuana based on science. The Doctors and specialists in Canada are required to stay abreast of current studies and advancement of treatments specific to their field of specialty., why is the CMA not held to same standards of accepted medical practice
The Arthritis Society has regular published articles on marijuana for the treatment of arthritic pain, as the pain clinic (Fall edition QE 11 Times 2014) at the QE 11, for pain, and so on. Are all these doctors not in compliance with the College and the CMA. Courts have proven otherwise.
Then they should examine the Charter ......
Recreation want to get wasted, or at least intoxicated for pleasure, as medical patients, or at least in my case it is the exact opposite
Apples and Oranges!.