Colorado, Washington: Pioneers In Permissible Pot

Truth Seeker

New Member
Colorado and Washington State are inextricably linked as pioneers on the road to marijuana legalization.

As the only states in the country with voter-approved ballot measures allowing adults 21 and over to own and consume small amounts of marijuana, the Centennial State and the Evergreen State are looking to each other for hints of what is working and what isn't, as they embark on an unprecedented journey.

"The more conversations we have, the better both of our states will be," said Alison Holcomb, drug policy director at the ACLU of Washington and primary author of the state's pot-legalizing Initiative 502.

The states' pot legalization measures in large part mirror each other, sharing the same consumption and possession limits and age requirements. Both states allow for the creation of recreational marijuana retail outlets and both worry about what any decision from the federal government will have on the effectiveness of their laws.

But Colorado and Washington are implementing their respective ballot measures, Amendment 64 and Initiative 502, in very different ways.

In the Evergreen State, the Washington State Liquor Control Board is responsible for drawing up the regulations for Initiative 502 and enforcing them. It decides how many retail locations will be allowed in each county in the state, using population as an allocation tool. The agency has until Dec. 1 to finalize its rules.

In Colorado, state lawmakers and the Department of Revenue are charged with creating rules to implement Amendment 64. City and towns have the power to ban or limit the presence of marijuana retail outlets. The state has until July 1 to get its regulations for recreational marijuana stores in place.

"Colorado is on a faster track," said Brian Smith, spokesman for the Washington State Liquor Control Board.

And that means Washington may be looking east more than Colorado looks west -- at least at first. Colorado, Smith said, has the advantage of having come up with extensive regulations for its medical marijuana industry, which can act as an effective guide for regulating a recreational marijuana sector. Washington has legal medical marijuana, he said, but it is largely unregulated.

"By having that system in place, you have that experience we don't necessarily have in Washington State," Smith said.

Holcomb said she has heard concern from Washington residents about the potential for industry consolidation and its effect on the marketing of marijuana, especially when it comes to children. Federal authorities are also worried about the effects of widely available marijuana on children, she said, as well diversion of the drug beyond state lines.

"My main concern is going to be whether we can create and preserve a public health strategy," she said.

But Holcomb said despite inevitable stumbles both states will experience in the early going, Colorado and Washington have the wherewithal and determination to find success in the untested world of legal cannabis.

"Hopefully, Washington and Colorado together can provide very important lessons to the rest of the world about the opportunities and pitfalls of reforming marijuana laws," she said.

be1ff6bb7663b4dd4d3df7a83f1563ef.jpg


News Hawk- TruthSeekr420 420 MAGAZINE
Source: dailycamera.com
Author: John Aguilar
Contact: Contact Us - Boulder Daily Camera
Website: Colorado, Washington: Pioneers in permissible pot - Boulder Daily Camera
 
Here is part of the Washington bill being written. Once an initiative is passed, the legislature has to write the actual law. They have a bit of wiggle room and this is what they added that I don't believe was in the initiative.

26 HOME GROWN CANNABIS
27 NEW SECTION. Sec. 65. A new section is added to chapter 66.12 RCW
28 to read as follows:
29 (1) It is unlawful for a person not licensed as a valid cannabis
30 farmer under section 25 of this act to produce cannabis except in
31 compliance with the following requirements:
32 (a) The person is twenty-one years of age or older;
SB 5598 p. 64
1 (b) The cannabis is produced in the home or yard that is not
2 visible from any public place, excluding air space;
3 (c) The person possesses no more than one cannabis garden;
4 (d) The homegrown cannabis garden or the square footage of the
5 total combined plant canopy area does not exceed fifty square feet in
6 size;
7 (e) The cannabis or hemp is produced on property owned or lawfully
8 leased by the person producing it;
9 (f) Any useable cannabis gratuitously transferred from the person
10 who owns, leases, or otherwise exerts control over the real property on
11 which the cannabis or hemp is being produced does not exceed one ounce
12 in weight; and
13 (g) The cannabis or hemp plants are not produced in a manner or
14 place that a reasonable person would know to be open to the view of a
15 member of the general public positioned in or moving through a public
16 place.
17 (2) A violation of this subsection is a gross misdemeanor offense.

I'm glad to see this added. I thought they were going to hang home growers and charge rediculous prices (which they are) in the licensed stores.

(I hope it gets passed without being redacted!)
 
Hopefully, these two states will lead the way in RESPONSIBLE & LEGAL cannabis use, whether medical or recreational...don't give the reefer madness voices anything to gripe about!
 
Back
Top Bottom