- Thread starter
- #101
Delps8
Well-Known Member
Re. 200 PPM - that would be a 40% increase since I’m at 520. That’s a huge increase but I can see how a 20% (100 PPM) from 520 could fill the bill.When I think of increasing or decreasing nute strength I think of 200ppm steps. I push my plants to the point of nute burn then back off 200ppm. If I have a FSF system and know my nute strength is pushing the max I back off 200ppm. I’m loath to underfeed.
Check out the PPM levels in the attachment. I’ve been at about 66% of the levels recommended for veg. If I stay with the 66% approach, that would put me at 594. Adding 10% to 580 is 638 which is 70% (900*.66=594). That sounds like a good next step.
One of the things that continues to amaze me is the lack of vertical growth. Could that be caused by underfeeding?
Agreed.These aren’t commercial grows where we’re watching every penny and balancing nute costs against yield.