It's under his SOG link
I only can only offer what I have been told about this line and verify it with the research availble either inherent or on the web And write what has been substantiated by all the available literature that Big Sur Holy Weed is a cross of Purple Zacatecas X unknown Afghani. Two accounts One Jerry Kamstra says in the book of weed 1974 a hippie grower grew Zacatecas in the Hills in southern Cali. but that doesn't say weater he kept it pure or crossed it. The other most widely published account is that a Monk named Perry made the cross after comming back from Mexico doing missionary work there And Kangu of Ocean Seeds Co in southern Cali picked up the line in the late sixties. If that is incorrect I would be thrilled if you would point me to a more accurate documentation.Well, believe what you want about having real BSHW, but no cigar there IMO. Buds show indica characteristics, which is typical of what I have seen in SAGE crosses. Also they are variable in color and phenos, and lack the true purple of the Zacataces strain. I am talking pure purple colas, leaves and calyxes on tall open plants, all sativa with more open flowers. They also grow consistently and without much variation, whereas the indica SAGE crosses throw a lot of different phenos.
I got my Zac Purple/Big Sur Holy beans in Big Sur from a guy I worked with who's dad was a large importer of fine Cannabis products from sunny Mexico. I suppose I will have to do another run of this strain to show people what the real deal is. I have people lined up ready to kill for these beans should I breed them.