- Thread starter
- #81
LED/CFL Grow Test-New LEDS
- Thread starter Boss
- Start date
biggreenbuds4
New Member
boss u are an expert
beutifal plants man
beutifal plants man
i cant wait to get my leds
- Thread starter
- #84
Thanks man 
Full med grow coming in a few months.
I just read something again that I thought I should share, it's absolutely brilliant.
_____________
The pressure of natural physical forces sometimes confronts a person in an emergency with a choice of two evils: either he may violate the literal terms of the criminal law and thus produce a harmful result, or he may comply with those terms and thus produce a greater or equal or lesser amount of harm. For reasons of social policy, if the harm which will result from compliance with the law is greater than that which will result from violation of it, he is by virtue of the defense of necessity justified in violating it.
W.R. LaFave & A.W. Scott, Jr., 1 Substantive Criminal Law § 5.4, at 627 (1986) (hereinafter LaFave & Scott). Or, as stated by Justice Holmes, " 'Detached reflection cannot be expected in the presence of an uplifted knife.' " Arnolds & Garland, The Defense of Necessity in Criminal Law: The Right to Choose the Lesser Evil, 65 J.Crim.L. & Criminology 289, 290 (1974) (hereinafter Arnolds & Garland) (quoting Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335, 41 S.Ct. 501, 65 L.Ed. 961 (1921)).
Full med grow coming in a few months.
I just read something again that I thought I should share, it's absolutely brilliant.
_____________
The pressure of natural physical forces sometimes confronts a person in an emergency with a choice of two evils: either he may violate the literal terms of the criminal law and thus produce a harmful result, or he may comply with those terms and thus produce a greater or equal or lesser amount of harm. For reasons of social policy, if the harm which will result from compliance with the law is greater than that which will result from violation of it, he is by virtue of the defense of necessity justified in violating it.
W.R. LaFave & A.W. Scott, Jr., 1 Substantive Criminal Law § 5.4, at 627 (1986) (hereinafter LaFave & Scott). Or, as stated by Justice Holmes, " 'Detached reflection cannot be expected in the presence of an uplifted knife.' " Arnolds & Garland, The Defense of Necessity in Criminal Law: The Right to Choose the Lesser Evil, 65 J.Crim.L. & Criminology 289, 290 (1974) (hereinafter Arnolds & Garland) (quoting Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335, 41 S.Ct. 501, 65 L.Ed. 961 (1921)).
exactly
- Thread starter
- #86
omizzle757
Active Member
Great stuff boss.. they look so nice and frosty, i could just take a bite out of them...!!!
- Thread starter
- #88
Smokin Moose
Fallen Cannabis Warrior & Ex Moderator
I'm loving this grow!
- Thread starter
- #91
4twenty4all
New Member
Excellent looking buds already! Looking like she will be like most of America and be overweight!!! But that is a good thing in this case..... Great grow as usual Boss!
- Thread starter
- #93
This plant is tiny. I expected another push up by now, maybe next week. The evidence so far is not looking good for the LEDS. Not these LEDs anyway. But we will see. If she doesnt push up another 4-6 inches, it will be a 1/4 plant when it's dry, and that will suck
Total wattage is 204, or close to that.
Total wattage is 204, or close to that.
- Thread starter
- #94
Medical Cannabis
New Member
can you take a lighter / bud size comparison??? thanks boss!! Beautiful buds
- Thread starter
- #97
This is the same strain as the large one I grew in the first grow. It was so sticky, you could roll a joint with it and then remove the paper, and it would stay stuck together. I am hopeing for more of the same.
I have a theory about these 12/12's and resin production, but I have more growing to do
I have a theory about these 12/12's and resin production, but I have more growing to do
- Thread starter
- #98
- Thread starter
- #99
wow nice
