420 Magazine Background

Limit on Marijuana Sought

Thread starter #1


[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON Apr-27-00 AT 01:59 PM (EST)[/font][p]

Jan.24, 00
Contra Costa Times (CA)
Copyright: 2000 Contra Costa Newspapers Inc.
Author: Maline Hazle
As California sheriffs and police continue to wrestle with the medical marijuana law, state Sen. Maurice Johannessen said he will draft a law to set limits on the amount of the drug that can be grown for medical use. "State legislators, in their usual fashion, have been diving for cover on this issue, leaving the sheriffs in the state and the district attorneys hanging out there," said Johannessen.
Controversy has swirled around enforcement of Proposition 215 since it was approved by voters in 1996. Although the law allows patients and their primary caregivers to grow and use "reasonable" amounts of marijuana if their doctors recommend it, it sets no limits on how much can be grown and how much may be possessed for personal use.
A wide range of interpretations has followed. In Tehama County, for example, patients are allowed to grow 18 seedlings but can keep only six plants that are beginning to bud. Once the plants mature they can keep three. Other counties have said patients can keep three-month supplies of marijuana but haven't specified how much that is. The issue roils on in Shasta County, which has no guidelines for the amount of marijuana patients can grow or possess.
A jury acquitted Richard Levin, 49, of Redding last month on charges of growing marijuana for sale. Last week, Superior Court Judge Bradley Boeckman ordered sheriff's deputies to return marijuana confiscated when Levin was arrested, but federal authorities seized the drug Friday. It's those kinds of back-and-forth interpretations of the law that Johannessen said he wants to eliminate. "I do not support marijuana use, but it's not my decision. It was made by the people when they voted," Johannessen said. "But it isn't fair to let the sheriff and the district attorney hang out there just because the Legislature doesn't have the guts" to clarify the law. Johannessen's planned legislation can't come too soon for local law enforcement.
Sheriff Jim Pope asked for the senator's help after the flap over Levin's case, undersheriff Larry Schaller said. "It's clear we need to clarify what is a valid prescription and what is a legal quantity of both processed marijuana and marijuana by prescription," Schaller said. Trinity County Sheriff Paul Schmidt agreed. "We've been hoping the state would do something like that. It's very difficult for law enforcement to decide. I mean, what do you do?" Schmidt asked. "This should have been done before the legislation was even passed." Shasta County District Attorney McGregor Scott, whose office unsuccessfully prosecuted Levin, said he supports Johannessen's effort. "Absolutely. We welcome any effort at the state level to address statewide problems that are present in this statewide law," Scott said. Johannessen said he will consult with law enforcement and others in an attempt to develop reasonable guidelines that can be imposed by every county in the state.
The bill will be introduced as "urgency legislation" so that if it wins legislative approval it could go into effect as soon as it is signed by the governor, he said. "In two or three months we could be done," he said. A law proposed last year by Sen. John Vasconcellos, D-San Jose, would establish a program to issue identification cards to medical marijuana users who request them. Ostensibly, the cards would alert police that the holder is allowed to use and possess marijuana. That bill is currently stalled.