T
The420Guy
Guest
Now That Washington Has Turned Its Repressive Drug Policies Against
Students, A Growing Campus Network Is Fighting Back
When Shawn Heller and Brian Gralnick joined Students for Sensible Drug
Policy in 1998, as sophomores at George Washington University, SSDP
was just a handful of students from Rochester Institute of Technology.
One of them, Kris Lotlikar, was working in Washington, D.C. at the
Drug Reform Coordination Network. Heller met Lotlikar and started the
second SSDP chapter, which soon included Gralnick. Their focus was
decriminalizing marijuana for medical purposes - until Rep. Mark
Souder (R-Ind,) decided to target college students with drug
convictions who were seeking federal loans. In October 1998, a law was
passed as part of the Higher Education Act that prohibits any
applicant with an adult drug conviction from receiving federal
financial aid. No other group, including convicted murders, was
similarly excluded. The Drug War had just hit college campuses.
On the strength of that single issue - and with the backing of DRCNet
- SSDP has grown into a national organization with more than seventy
chapters, carrying out a sophisticated campaign to repeal the law.
They have successfully pushed thirty-five student governments, the
United States Student Association and the Association of Big Ten
Schools to call for repeal of the HEA provision. Most notably, Heller,
now SSDP's national director, and DRCNet campus coordinator Steven
Silverman have met with Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Bobby Scott
(D-Va.), both of whom pushed repeal bills last year.
Neither bill passed. Neither was expected to. The debates were a
victory for SSDP, however - an affirmation of sorts. In crafting their
legislation, both congressmen leaned heavily on SSDP for information
and research. They echoed many of SSDP's main arguments: The law
singles out low-income families and, due to racial inequities in
sentencing, nonwhite students; there is no like provision for any
other crime; the federal government requires no such disclosure when
it awards grants or subsidies to businessmen. In his remarks before
the House Workforce and Education Committee, Scott mentioned the
SSDP-led Coalition for HEA Reform campaign by name.
The environment for drug policy reform hasn't improved with the new
president, but the battle will continue this spring, when Frank plans
to reintroduce his bill. Heller says SSDP members are preparing for
the long haul. They are working with drug-policy reform veterans such
as the Lindesmith Center - Drug Policy Foundation and cooperating
groups such as DanceSafe and the Center for Women's Policy Studies -
trying to branch out wherever they can, especially in areas where
issues overlap.
There are positive signs on the academic front, as well. SSDP chapters
have collected roughly sixty signatures on an educator sign-on letter,
including that of Hampshire College President George S. Prince Jr.,
the first university head to come out against the provision.
"Education is the best antidote we have to most of our social ills,"
Prince says. "Why do you want to exclude people from the education
system when trying to keep them in the system is the most important
thing you can do?"
Other potential allies include financial-aid administrators. The law
"just doesn't seem to be all that much related to helping poor people
go to school, which is my main mission," says Todd Morriss, a
financial-aid administrator at Southwest Missouri State University.
Terry Hartle, of the American Council on Education, says, "The mere
fact of having made a mistake, most likely at a young age, over a drug
violation shouldn't preclude someone getting student financial aid.
SSDP, he says, is "working on the grass-roots or campus level, and
that's where pressure on this needs to come from."
Through mid-January, the Department of Education had processed more
than 9.3 million financial-aid applications for the 2000-01 school
year. Nearly 8.5 million (91 percent) were approved. All of 8,056
(.09%) have been denied aid under the Souder amendment.
One of those is Marisa Garcia, a sophomore at California State
University at Fullerton, who was deemed ineligible for student aid
after having been convicted of marijuana possession (her penalty was a
$415 fine). She and her mother had been counting on the loan. Marisa
was able to stay in college only after she upped the number of hours
she works at a local flower shop to thirty a week, and her mother took
out a loan against her house. Marisa recently started an SSDP chapter
at her school. "I'll stand up for everyone else who doesn't know
there's someone fighting for them."
The Republican congressmen who supported the bill insist that taxpayer
money should not be wasted on drug users. In a faxed statement to
Rolling Stone, Ron Paul (R-Tex.) wrote, "I believe it is completely
legitimate and justifiable for Congress to restrict access to federal
aid for those with substance-abuse problems. To do otherwise would
support the erroneous notion that people have a right to taxpayer
funds regardless of their actions." Souder let numerous phone calls
seeking comment on his bill go unreturned. He has asserted elsewhere
that federal financial aid "is a privilege, not a right."
If SSDP is to succeed, one of its many tasks will be to parry the
favorite accusation of its pro-Drug War opponents - that drug-law
reformers are closet legalizers. Last October, Brian Gralnick attended
a taping of CNN's Crossfire on the George Washington campus. He asked
the hosts about the HEA drug provision. He drew limited responses from
them, but after the show he approached Office of National Drug Control
Policy spokesman Robert S. Weiner, who was in the audience. Their
conversation quickly became a policy argument. Then Weiner said, "What
are you, on drugs?"
"The only drug I had that day was MSG in my Chinese food," Gralnick
wrote later. Weiner says Gralnick accosted him while he was leaving
with his wife, that "his head was darting back and forth, and he was
coming at me in a very irrational way.... He did look a bit unstable.
So., bid deal." About SSDP, he says, "All they want to do is legalize
drugs."
Some minds will not change. SSDP, though, has to identify those that
might, be they students or elected officials. Barney Frank, SSDP's
best ally on the Hill, says the students should keep the pressure on.
"I hope people won't be discouraged because it's not likely to succeed
right away," he says. "We've made some gains already, and if people
keep it up, I think we'll ultimately get rid of the whole thing."
Pubdate: Thu, 15 Feb 2001
Source: Rolling Stone (US)
Copyright: 2001 Straight Arrow Publishers Company, L.P.
Contact: letters@rollingstone.com
Address: 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104-0298
Fax: (212) 767-8214
Website: Rolling Stone
Forum: https://yourturn.rollingstone.com/webx?98@@webx1.html
Author: Phil Zabriskie
Note: Phil Zabriski wrote "The New Anti-War Protesters," in RS 852.
MapInc
Bookmark: MapInc (Higher Education Act)
Students, A Growing Campus Network Is Fighting Back
When Shawn Heller and Brian Gralnick joined Students for Sensible Drug
Policy in 1998, as sophomores at George Washington University, SSDP
was just a handful of students from Rochester Institute of Technology.
One of them, Kris Lotlikar, was working in Washington, D.C. at the
Drug Reform Coordination Network. Heller met Lotlikar and started the
second SSDP chapter, which soon included Gralnick. Their focus was
decriminalizing marijuana for medical purposes - until Rep. Mark
Souder (R-Ind,) decided to target college students with drug
convictions who were seeking federal loans. In October 1998, a law was
passed as part of the Higher Education Act that prohibits any
applicant with an adult drug conviction from receiving federal
financial aid. No other group, including convicted murders, was
similarly excluded. The Drug War had just hit college campuses.
On the strength of that single issue - and with the backing of DRCNet
- SSDP has grown into a national organization with more than seventy
chapters, carrying out a sophisticated campaign to repeal the law.
They have successfully pushed thirty-five student governments, the
United States Student Association and the Association of Big Ten
Schools to call for repeal of the HEA provision. Most notably, Heller,
now SSDP's national director, and DRCNet campus coordinator Steven
Silverman have met with Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Bobby Scott
(D-Va.), both of whom pushed repeal bills last year.
Neither bill passed. Neither was expected to. The debates were a
victory for SSDP, however - an affirmation of sorts. In crafting their
legislation, both congressmen leaned heavily on SSDP for information
and research. They echoed many of SSDP's main arguments: The law
singles out low-income families and, due to racial inequities in
sentencing, nonwhite students; there is no like provision for any
other crime; the federal government requires no such disclosure when
it awards grants or subsidies to businessmen. In his remarks before
the House Workforce and Education Committee, Scott mentioned the
SSDP-led Coalition for HEA Reform campaign by name.
The environment for drug policy reform hasn't improved with the new
president, but the battle will continue this spring, when Frank plans
to reintroduce his bill. Heller says SSDP members are preparing for
the long haul. They are working with drug-policy reform veterans such
as the Lindesmith Center - Drug Policy Foundation and cooperating
groups such as DanceSafe and the Center for Women's Policy Studies -
trying to branch out wherever they can, especially in areas where
issues overlap.
There are positive signs on the academic front, as well. SSDP chapters
have collected roughly sixty signatures on an educator sign-on letter,
including that of Hampshire College President George S. Prince Jr.,
the first university head to come out against the provision.
"Education is the best antidote we have to most of our social ills,"
Prince says. "Why do you want to exclude people from the education
system when trying to keep them in the system is the most important
thing you can do?"
Other potential allies include financial-aid administrators. The law
"just doesn't seem to be all that much related to helping poor people
go to school, which is my main mission," says Todd Morriss, a
financial-aid administrator at Southwest Missouri State University.
Terry Hartle, of the American Council on Education, says, "The mere
fact of having made a mistake, most likely at a young age, over a drug
violation shouldn't preclude someone getting student financial aid.
SSDP, he says, is "working on the grass-roots or campus level, and
that's where pressure on this needs to come from."
Through mid-January, the Department of Education had processed more
than 9.3 million financial-aid applications for the 2000-01 school
year. Nearly 8.5 million (91 percent) were approved. All of 8,056
(.09%) have been denied aid under the Souder amendment.
One of those is Marisa Garcia, a sophomore at California State
University at Fullerton, who was deemed ineligible for student aid
after having been convicted of marijuana possession (her penalty was a
$415 fine). She and her mother had been counting on the loan. Marisa
was able to stay in college only after she upped the number of hours
she works at a local flower shop to thirty a week, and her mother took
out a loan against her house. Marisa recently started an SSDP chapter
at her school. "I'll stand up for everyone else who doesn't know
there's someone fighting for them."
The Republican congressmen who supported the bill insist that taxpayer
money should not be wasted on drug users. In a faxed statement to
Rolling Stone, Ron Paul (R-Tex.) wrote, "I believe it is completely
legitimate and justifiable for Congress to restrict access to federal
aid for those with substance-abuse problems. To do otherwise would
support the erroneous notion that people have a right to taxpayer
funds regardless of their actions." Souder let numerous phone calls
seeking comment on his bill go unreturned. He has asserted elsewhere
that federal financial aid "is a privilege, not a right."
If SSDP is to succeed, one of its many tasks will be to parry the
favorite accusation of its pro-Drug War opponents - that drug-law
reformers are closet legalizers. Last October, Brian Gralnick attended
a taping of CNN's Crossfire on the George Washington campus. He asked
the hosts about the HEA drug provision. He drew limited responses from
them, but after the show he approached Office of National Drug Control
Policy spokesman Robert S. Weiner, who was in the audience. Their
conversation quickly became a policy argument. Then Weiner said, "What
are you, on drugs?"
"The only drug I had that day was MSG in my Chinese food," Gralnick
wrote later. Weiner says Gralnick accosted him while he was leaving
with his wife, that "his head was darting back and forth, and he was
coming at me in a very irrational way.... He did look a bit unstable.
So., bid deal." About SSDP, he says, "All they want to do is legalize
drugs."
Some minds will not change. SSDP, though, has to identify those that
might, be they students or elected officials. Barney Frank, SSDP's
best ally on the Hill, says the students should keep the pressure on.
"I hope people won't be discouraged because it's not likely to succeed
right away," he says. "We've made some gains already, and if people
keep it up, I think we'll ultimately get rid of the whole thing."
Pubdate: Thu, 15 Feb 2001
Source: Rolling Stone (US)
Copyright: 2001 Straight Arrow Publishers Company, L.P.
Contact: letters@rollingstone.com
Address: 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104-0298
Fax: (212) 767-8214
Website: Rolling Stone
Forum: https://yourturn.rollingstone.com/webx?98@@webx1.html
Author: Phil Zabriskie
Note: Phil Zabriski wrote "The New Anti-War Protesters," in RS 852.
MapInc
Bookmark: MapInc (Higher Education Act)
