Rider509
Well-Known Member
I'm looking at moving beyond the MH/HPS combo for growing. Not sold on the mostly uber expensive and rapidly evolving LED market. At least not until prices come down.
The HPS has been the go-to light for flowering our plants for a very long time. But what's been the driving factor in making it the defacto standard? Low initial cost of purchase? Availability? The fact that it produces killer yields?
After looking at the spectrum of light put out by other commonly available lights I'm wondering why the ceramic metal halide (CMH) lights aren't more popular for flowering. It looks like it more closely matches the McCree curve than HPS. That should be a better thing right?
Without diving into the high dollar world of LEDs, doesn't the CMH make better sense than HPS for flowering?
Just curious about what the more knowledgeable among us think.
The HPS has been the go-to light for flowering our plants for a very long time. But what's been the driving factor in making it the defacto standard? Low initial cost of purchase? Availability? The fact that it produces killer yields?
After looking at the spectrum of light put out by other commonly available lights I'm wondering why the ceramic metal halide (CMH) lights aren't more popular for flowering. It looks like it more closely matches the McCree curve than HPS. That should be a better thing right?
Without diving into the high dollar world of LEDs, doesn't the CMH make better sense than HPS for flowering?
Just curious about what the more knowledgeable among us think.