Katelyn Baker
Well-Known Member
Phoenix - A trial judge today ordered a change in how Secretary of State Michele Reagan is describing to voters the effects of a measure to legalize marijuana.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge James Blomo rejected arguments that Reagan was factually correct when she said that the drug would be available only to those "over 21." Assistant Attorney General James Driscoll-Maceachron told the judge that "over 21" can mean the same thing as being 21 or older.
"I guess I disagree with that," Blomo responded, saying it runs contrary to a plain understanding of the English language.
"If I hear you have to be over 21, that means 22," he said. Blomo, in his ruling, called the language "clearly misleading," as the measure would allow anyone at least 21 to buy and use the drug.
But Blomo refused to make two other changes sought by proponents of Proposition 205: that voters be told a 15 percent tax on the drug would help fund education, and that some drug offenses would remain felonies.
Supporters of Proposition 205 are arguing about the verbiage because Reagan's description of what the measure would do appears not only on the ballot but also in a pamphlet mailed to the homes of all registered voters.
What Blomo ruled today, however, could be academic.
The Arizona Supreme Court is expected to rule later today whether voters get a chance to decide the issue at all.
Opponents charge that both a required 100-word description and the initiative itself is misleading and should not be allowed to go on the ballot. But that argument already has been rebuffed by a trial court judge.
News Moderator: Katelyn Baker 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Wording For Arizona Marijuana Measure Misleading
Author: Howard Fischer
Contact: 1-800-695-4492
Photo Credit: Glen Stubbe
Website: Tuscon
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge James Blomo rejected arguments that Reagan was factually correct when she said that the drug would be available only to those "over 21." Assistant Attorney General James Driscoll-Maceachron told the judge that "over 21" can mean the same thing as being 21 or older.
"I guess I disagree with that," Blomo responded, saying it runs contrary to a plain understanding of the English language.
"If I hear you have to be over 21, that means 22," he said. Blomo, in his ruling, called the language "clearly misleading," as the measure would allow anyone at least 21 to buy and use the drug.
But Blomo refused to make two other changes sought by proponents of Proposition 205: that voters be told a 15 percent tax on the drug would help fund education, and that some drug offenses would remain felonies.
Supporters of Proposition 205 are arguing about the verbiage because Reagan's description of what the measure would do appears not only on the ballot but also in a pamphlet mailed to the homes of all registered voters.
What Blomo ruled today, however, could be academic.
The Arizona Supreme Court is expected to rule later today whether voters get a chance to decide the issue at all.
Opponents charge that both a required 100-word description and the initiative itself is misleading and should not be allowed to go on the ballot. But that argument already has been rebuffed by a trial court judge.
News Moderator: Katelyn Baker 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Wording For Arizona Marijuana Measure Misleading
Author: Howard Fischer
Contact: 1-800-695-4492
Photo Credit: Glen Stubbe
Website: Tuscon
