Katelyn Baker
Well-Known Member
Around the time that the Maryland legislature's longtime champion for medical cannabis joined a company looking to dispense the drug, he urged state regulators to remove a restriction on the sale of edible marijuana products.
Two months later, Del. Dan K. Morhaim sought feedback from regulators for his plans to introduce legislation allowing dentists, podiatrists and certain nurse practitioners to join physicians in recommending cannabis to patients.
Such interactions, detailed in emails obtained by The Washington Post, shed light on the contact the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission had with Morhaim, whose colleagues in the state legislature are scheduled to meet Oct. 19 to decide whether to investigate the lawmaker's dual roles.
One key issue could be whether Morhaim, a Democrat from Baltimore County, violated a prohibition on state officials using the prestige of office for private gain, according to two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.
Morhaim has vowed complete cooperation, and maintains that he followed all rules and did nothing wrong.
He emphasizes that he has no ownership interest in Doctor's Orders and says he properly filled out legislative disclosure forms in July, 2015, the same month he became involved with the company.
On those forms, which are required whenever there is a significant change in a lawmaker's finances, Morhaim wrote that he might work as a consultant in the field of medical cannabis and had received income through a consulting firm. Maryland requires lawmakers to disclose sources of income, but does not require those who work as consultants or lawyers to reveal their clients.
He has a letter from the ethics advisor to the General Assembly saying he did not need to disclose his clients, and clearing him to carry legislation expanding the types of medical professionals who can recommend medical marijuana.
Morhaim's advocacy on medical marijuana dates bacsk years, long before his busines involvement. He says he is motivated by a desire to make the drug available to thousands of sick patients across Maryland.
"As a legislator, I have not been exposed to any confidential or proprietary information," Morhaim said. "Legislators frequently work in industries where they have developed initial expertise in a subject matter in the legislature."
But the state delegate who co-sponsored medical cannabis legislation with Morhaim has called for him to be investigated, arguing that lawmakers shouldn't be able to cash in on new industries they helped create.
"I would never even consider [joining a cannabis company], even if it was okay," said Del. Cheryl Glenn. "It would lessen my integrity, and people would look at me differently: 'Am I doing this for personal gain, or am I really doing this because I believe in the patient ?' "
In recent days, Morhaim has offered new details about his position with Doctor's Orders, which was first reported by the Post in July. He says he received modest compensation for helping to write the company's medical policies and assemble a medical advisory board, but hasn't worked for them or received payment since.
Doctor's Orders chief executive Glenn Weinberg declined to comment on what work Morhaim has done for the company. In its dispensary applications, the company describes the veteran lawmaker and emergency room physician as a "highly sought-after" clinical director who would work closely with the chief executive in developing strategies and procedures.
The company received preliminary licenses in August to grow and process medical cannabis. The commission is still considering dispensary applications, and has not said when they will be awarded.
Morhaim says he told then-commission executive director Hannah Byron before applications for licenses were submitted last November that he was involved with a cannabis company. Names and other identification were redacted from the applications, which were reviewed by a team of evaluators and by the appointed commissioners, so that each team would be judged on its merits.
Byron, who left the commission in January, says she never told the commissioners that Morhaim was affiliated with one of the applicants, because she expected him to formally notify them of the arrangement.
The Post requested emails sent by the lawmaker to key commission members and staff, as well as emails from those individuals that either went to Morhaim or mentioned him or Doctor's Orders by name. The commission released some e-mails last week, and a full batch of more than 1,000 messages this week.
The emails do not show Morhaim directly pushing for any changes that appear to be tailored specifically to benefit Doctor's Orders. They demonstrate the clout and influence the lawmaker carried with regulators both before and after he joined the company, and suggest that his frequent involvement frustrated some commissioners.
Among the items of note:
At least one commissioner complained about Morhaim working with Byron and other commissioners to ease strict rules.
"Morhaim is legislating out many of the regulations we worked hard to put into place for patient safety," commissioner Chris Charles wrote to colleagues in March 16, 2015, as the industry's regulations were being shaped and months before Morhaim became involved in Doctor's Orders. "He is also influencing the Executive Committee to take out of the regs things he doesn't like."
Paul Davies, the current chair of the commission, said to his knowledge, Morhaim is no longer in close contact with regulators.
"It would be unacceptable for any commissioner to have ex parte discussions with anyone associated with a potential licensee, particularly discussions that could provide unfair guidance or an advantage," said Davies. "Safeguarding the objectivity of the Commission's regulation of this industry remains a priority."
News Moderator: Katelyn Baker 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Maryland Lawmaker Helped Shape The Medical Marijuana Industry And Joined It
Author: Fenit Nirappil and Aaron Gregg
Photo Credit: drdanmorhaim.com
Website: philly.com
Two months later, Del. Dan K. Morhaim sought feedback from regulators for his plans to introduce legislation allowing dentists, podiatrists and certain nurse practitioners to join physicians in recommending cannabis to patients.
Such interactions, detailed in emails obtained by The Washington Post, shed light on the contact the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission had with Morhaim, whose colleagues in the state legislature are scheduled to meet Oct. 19 to decide whether to investigate the lawmaker's dual roles.
One key issue could be whether Morhaim, a Democrat from Baltimore County, violated a prohibition on state officials using the prestige of office for private gain, according to two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.
Morhaim has vowed complete cooperation, and maintains that he followed all rules and did nothing wrong.
He emphasizes that he has no ownership interest in Doctor's Orders and says he properly filled out legislative disclosure forms in July, 2015, the same month he became involved with the company.
On those forms, which are required whenever there is a significant change in a lawmaker's finances, Morhaim wrote that he might work as a consultant in the field of medical cannabis and had received income through a consulting firm. Maryland requires lawmakers to disclose sources of income, but does not require those who work as consultants or lawyers to reveal their clients.
He has a letter from the ethics advisor to the General Assembly saying he did not need to disclose his clients, and clearing him to carry legislation expanding the types of medical professionals who can recommend medical marijuana.
Morhaim's advocacy on medical marijuana dates bacsk years, long before his busines involvement. He says he is motivated by a desire to make the drug available to thousands of sick patients across Maryland.
"As a legislator, I have not been exposed to any confidential or proprietary information," Morhaim said. "Legislators frequently work in industries where they have developed initial expertise in a subject matter in the legislature."
But the state delegate who co-sponsored medical cannabis legislation with Morhaim has called for him to be investigated, arguing that lawmakers shouldn't be able to cash in on new industries they helped create.
"I would never even consider [joining a cannabis company], even if it was okay," said Del. Cheryl Glenn. "It would lessen my integrity, and people would look at me differently: 'Am I doing this for personal gain, or am I really doing this because I believe in the patient ?' "
In recent days, Morhaim has offered new details about his position with Doctor's Orders, which was first reported by the Post in July. He says he received modest compensation for helping to write the company's medical policies and assemble a medical advisory board, but hasn't worked for them or received payment since.
Doctor's Orders chief executive Glenn Weinberg declined to comment on what work Morhaim has done for the company. In its dispensary applications, the company describes the veteran lawmaker and emergency room physician as a "highly sought-after" clinical director who would work closely with the chief executive in developing strategies and procedures.
The company received preliminary licenses in August to grow and process medical cannabis. The commission is still considering dispensary applications, and has not said when they will be awarded.
Morhaim says he told then-commission executive director Hannah Byron before applications for licenses were submitted last November that he was involved with a cannabis company. Names and other identification were redacted from the applications, which were reviewed by a team of evaluators and by the appointed commissioners, so that each team would be judged on its merits.
Byron, who left the commission in January, says she never told the commissioners that Morhaim was affiliated with one of the applicants, because she expected him to formally notify them of the arrangement.
The Post requested emails sent by the lawmaker to key commission members and staff, as well as emails from those individuals that either went to Morhaim or mentioned him or Doctor's Orders by name. The commission released some e-mails last week, and a full batch of more than 1,000 messages this week.
The emails do not show Morhaim directly pushing for any changes that appear to be tailored specifically to benefit Doctor's Orders. They demonstrate the clout and influence the lawmaker carried with regulators both before and after he joined the company, and suggest that his frequent involvement frustrated some commissioners.
Among the items of note:
- In March, 2015, the commission and the state Board of Physicians were feuding over whether doctors who work in marijuana dispensaries could also recommend the drug to patients in clinical settings. Morhaim helped edit the commission director's response to the Board of Physician's concerns.
- In May, 2015, Morhaim urged the commission to require regulators who leave their posts to wait for an extended period before being able to work for medical marijuana companies. Such a rule, he said, would prevent an obvious conflict of interest.
- He made suggestions to the governor's office of who should be appointed to the commission. At times, he weighed in on mundate matters, including the e-mail signoffs from the agency's communications and what was posted on its website.
At least one commissioner complained about Morhaim working with Byron and other commissioners to ease strict rules.
"Morhaim is legislating out many of the regulations we worked hard to put into place for patient safety," commissioner Chris Charles wrote to colleagues in March 16, 2015, as the industry's regulations were being shaped and months before Morhaim became involved in Doctor's Orders. "He is also influencing the Executive Committee to take out of the regs things he doesn't like."
Paul Davies, the current chair of the commission, said to his knowledge, Morhaim is no longer in close contact with regulators.
"It would be unacceptable for any commissioner to have ex parte discussions with anyone associated with a potential licensee, particularly discussions that could provide unfair guidance or an advantage," said Davies. "Safeguarding the objectivity of the Commission's regulation of this industry remains a priority."
News Moderator: Katelyn Baker 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Maryland Lawmaker Helped Shape The Medical Marijuana Industry And Joined It
Author: Fenit Nirappil and Aaron Gregg
Photo Credit: drdanmorhaim.com
Website: philly.com
