LOS ANGELES: City Council Bans Medical Marijuana Outlets

Spliff Twister

New Member
Anyone wanting to open a new medical marijuana dispensary in Los Angeles within the next year might see their plans go up in smoke, under a plan approved Tuesday by a City Council committee.

The council's Planning and Land Use Management Committee asked the Planning Department, the LAPD and the City Attorney's Office to draft an ordinance calling for a one-year ban on building new medical marijuana dispensaries.

The proposed ordinance is expected to go before the full City Council by the start of next year, when authorities will begin to weed out illegal dealers from legitimate dispensaries.

Councilman Dennis Zine introduced the moratorium idea last month, saying that too many of the dispensaries were operating in the city, oftentimes illegally selling pot to those without prescriptions.

About 80 medical marijuana dispensaries currently operate in Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles Police Department.

Don Duncan, Southern California coordinator for Americans for Safe Access, said his medical marijuana advocacy group supported the moratorium "as long as this is a step toward proper regulation."

"Our reports have shown that regulations protect patients and that they protect communities from abuses," Duncan told the three-member panel.

"Rather than have a controversial situation in the city of Los Angeles, our constituents would prefer that there be an interim control ordinance and good regulations on the books."

Medical marijuana dispensaries are defined as "facilities that provide marijuana for medical purposes to patients or primary caregivers who have a related recommendation from a physician."

Ten years ago, 56 percent of California's voters approved Proposition 215, which says marijuana should be made available to people with medical problems, including nausea from cancer and AIDS treatments.

Federal law still band marijuana use in all cases. AIDS activist Richard Kearns of Hollywood, who was diagnosed with the disease in 1987, asked the committee to adopt the motion without further stigmatizing those who would benefit from medical cannabis.

"Their chance of survival would improve because their quality of lives would improve," Kearns said. "Like me, for instance, they would be less likely to heave their pills first thing in the morning."

In May, the Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance regulating medical marijuana dispensaries in unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, including provisions on where the drug can be consumed.

The previous Los Angeles Police Commission, appointed by former Mayor James Hahn, approved a measure in July 2005 limiting the dispensaries to commercial areas.

That plan is expected to finally go before the council's Public Safety Committee next month, when the panel will also listen to a report on how such businesses impact surrounding neighborhoods.


Newshawk: Spliff Twsiter - www.420Times.com
Source: CBS 2, Los Angeles CA
Pubdate: October 24, 2006
Copyright: © MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc.
Website: CBS Los Angeles
 
Mixed feelings here. I don't live there so its easy for me to say. I think if they are legit with their finding or inspections or whatever and dispensaries are allowed to continue supplying patients who are legit it would be good. It could take all the propaganda away, well somewhat anyway. But hell they can't even fairly regulate the legal medical/drug industry so how are people who are for the most part biased anyway going to make an unbiased decision? Even if they sent in undercover people how could we ever trust them not to set people up? Wolves guarding the hen house.
 
A CBS article yesterday began with the headline "City Council Bans Medical
Marijuana Outlets." While this might be the headline some news agencies
wish they had, it is not at all accurate.

What occured yesterday was the Planning and Land Use Management Committee of
the LA City Council directed their staff to begin writing the text of the
moratorium on new dispensaries. This was stated rather clearly in the text
of the article itself despite the rather alarming and misleading headline.

Yesterday's hearing was actually the first step towards regulated and
licensed dispensing collectives in the second largest city in the US. Such
headlines are not neccessarily a bad thing, as long as they remain just
headlines. Some news agencies have been using sensational headlines to grab
viewers' attention anytime something negative happens around a collective.
A perceived "crackdown" on dispensaries will help to limit any actual
public outcry towards collectives as we come into the process of drafting
regulations.

Next month the Public Safety Committee will hold a similar hearing. I
wouldn't be surprised if we see negative headlines all the way through the
passage of the regulatory ordinance. Just be sure to get the details of the
story.

At these small, private committee meetings, only a small group of well
spoken patients are neccessary. However, when these issues come before the
full Council, we would like to see large groups of voters telling the
Council they want to see the collectives regulated. Please keep an eye out
for announcements regarding full Council hearings on this issue. We need
your support.
 
Back
Top Bottom