The Desert Hot Springs Planning Commission weighed in this week on two key issues affecting the city's future: medical marijuana and its art-in-public places program.
The commission voted 3-2 on Tuesday to recommend banning medical marijuana dispensaries. The commission had tied 2-2 on the issue at a previous meeting, one that Chairman John Gerardi had been unable to attend.
The commission also voted 3-1-1 to recommend a new fee structure for the city's proposed art-in-public-places program. Commissioner John Aguilar dissented, and commissioner Ron Stewart abstained.
The commission recommended a fee of 0.5 percent on the value of new residential projects, and 0.75 percent on the value of new commercial projects, according to a city release.
The City Council had asked the commission to revisit the art fees with more information on other valley cities' art programs.
That fee structure is projected to create more than $33 million in funding for new art in the city over the next 20-25 years, the release stated.
However, Fred Bell, director of the Building Industry Association's desert chapter, called that projection low and said Thursday the city staff is "under-forecasting revenues."
Bell said the fee structure would generate closer to $42 million for city art.
Bell and city officials have wrangled in recent weeks over the art in public places fee proposal as well as proposed developer impact fee hikes.
News Hawk- Ganjarden 420 MAGAZINE ® - Medical Marijuana Publication & Social Networking
Source: The Desert Sun
Author: Marcel Honoré
Contact: The Desert Sun
Copyright: 2008 MyDesert.com.
Website: Desert Hot Springs Medical Marijuana Plans Up In Smoke
The commission voted 3-2 on Tuesday to recommend banning medical marijuana dispensaries. The commission had tied 2-2 on the issue at a previous meeting, one that Chairman John Gerardi had been unable to attend.
The commission also voted 3-1-1 to recommend a new fee structure for the city's proposed art-in-public-places program. Commissioner John Aguilar dissented, and commissioner Ron Stewart abstained.
The commission recommended a fee of 0.5 percent on the value of new residential projects, and 0.75 percent on the value of new commercial projects, according to a city release.
The City Council had asked the commission to revisit the art fees with more information on other valley cities' art programs.
That fee structure is projected to create more than $33 million in funding for new art in the city over the next 20-25 years, the release stated.
However, Fred Bell, director of the Building Industry Association's desert chapter, called that projection low and said Thursday the city staff is "under-forecasting revenues."
Bell said the fee structure would generate closer to $42 million for city art.
Bell and city officials have wrangled in recent weeks over the art in public places fee proposal as well as proposed developer impact fee hikes.
News Hawk- Ganjarden 420 MAGAZINE ® - Medical Marijuana Publication & Social Networking
Source: The Desert Sun
Author: Marcel Honoré
Contact: The Desert Sun
Copyright: 2008 MyDesert.com.
Website: Desert Hot Springs Medical Marijuana Plans Up In Smoke
