Dispensary Operators Say L.A. Marijuana Ordinance Will Harm Patients

Weedpipe

420 Member
Medical marijuana dispensary advocates assailed the Los Angeles City Council's vote today to approve a medical marijuana ordinance, saying the measure was unworkable and would dramatically restrict access to patients who need the drug.

The council voted 9-3 to pass the long-awaited measure without discussion, but supporters of medical marijuana then streamed to the microphone during the time for public comment. "It's a disaster for patients," said James Shaw, the director of the Union of Medical Marijuana Patients.

City Council members, however, expressed relief that an ordinance should soon be in place, even if it may require some changes. "I think we did our best to interpret the state law the way it is written," said Councilman Ed Reyes, who oversaw much of the ordinance's drafting.

The ordinance will allow most dispensaries that registered with the city in 2007 to continue to operate, a number that may be around 150. But those stores will still have to comply with the location restrictions, including being at least 1,000 feet away from schools, parks and libraries.

Many operators said today that they will be unable to find suitable locations because the City Council also added restrictions to keep the stores from abutting or being across an alley from residential property. Operators also said that landlords, aware that there are very few buildings that can meet the tight location restrictions, are already jacking up rents.


Barry Kramer, who runs California Patients Alliance, a registered collective on Melrose Avenue, said that he looked for eight months for a location that was not near schools and other sensitive uses before he opened 2½ years ago. Because of the alley restriction, he said he will be forced to move. "The frustration is that we've tried to work so hard, 2½ years of working with everything that they've brought down," he said. "Now, all those good operators are going to be cast aside."

The ordinance does not take effect until the City Council approves fees that dispensaries will have to pay, but the operators that have to move, which is most of them, are already racing to find locations. "We're scrambling right now," Kramer said. "No, we have not found anything."

Neighborhood activists, who have been vastly outnumbered at every City Council meeting, urged the lawmakers to act quickly to begin to enforce the ordinance. Lisa Sarkin, chairwoman of the Studio City Neighborhood Council land-use board, noted that there were 13 dispensaries in the area. "I can't imagine how this could be necessary," she said.

An organization representing medical marijuana collectives that registered with the city is considering hiring a well-connected lobbyist to pressure the City Council to make changes and a lawyer to investigate whether there are grounds to sue.

Dispensary operators who did not register, many of whom opened last year, are exploring whether to sue the city or collect signatures to force a referendum on the ordinance.

"We are prepared to go forward and stop this ordinance," said Dan Lutz, who operates the Green Oasis dispensary. "I regret that we have to go this route."



News Hawk- Weedpipe 420 Magazine - Cannabis Culture News & Reviews
Source: Los Angeles Times
Author: John Hoeffel
Contact: Los Angeles Times
Copyright: 2010 Los Angeles Times
Website:Dispensary operators say L.A. marijuana ordinance will harm patients
 
Now, you can only belong to one dispensary. Your attitude is what is wrong with L.A. county. Regulations were needed, but they took it too far. Put the X down and look at what is happening to our city thanks to our terrible city government.
 
I thought the problem was the illegal dispensaries and the dispensaries that operate within 1000 feet on school, playground, place of worship, and without the necessary licenses and permits. Thanks to terrible city , state, and federal government we are in a recession and unemployment is higher than it has been in my lifetime but that has nothing to do with pot.
Some dispensaries do not have tax id numbers so please explain to me how they are planning on paying taxes or are they planning to commit tax evasion?
Even if every dispensary is closed you will still have delivery services. The city government is not going to prevent us from smoking pot. I was able to get pot from dispensaries when they only existed in West Hollywood. You can also get pot directly from a farmer. I have to go smoke now.
 
The new regulations will not "harm" me at all. There are still many dispensaries and delivery services.

Nope, won't harm you--will just make you a criminal for going to more than one dispensary or collective or delivery service, or getting it from anyone else rather than the ONE establishment you've become a member with.
 
I am unaware of any rule saying a person can't go to more than one dispensary or use a delivery service. Can you show me where LA city council has said that? No matter how many dispensaries close I will not feel any "harm." Perhaps some people will be inconvenienced but inconvenience is not "harm." The dispensary owners say it 'will harm patients" to deflect how it will harm them ( the owners) financially. Just grow you own so you don't feel "harm." It harms my community that some dispensary owners are committing tax evasion as tax money is used for public services. I wonder if the owner of Organica felt 'harm" when the IRS seized approximately $100,000 in cash from him. The IRS would not have seized the money if he didn't owe it. Marijuana dispensaries are supposed to be non profit. The owner of Herbalcure owes California over a half a million dollars as a result of the fraud at Mepco Oil which was a company that shorted that California people on gas. This was done by installing an altered chip in the gas pump. It has harmed California that he hasn't paid his debt. Instead of paying the debt to the California people he decided to do massive renovations to his backyard without obtaining the necessary permits, buy a baby grand piano, and spend three weeks in Europe.
 
Back
Top Bottom