State Medical Marijuana Laws Are Getting Stricter

Fourteen states and the District of Columbia allow people to use marijuana to treat a wide variety of ailments. Each law is different – but if you look at them in chronological order, a pattern emerges: The laws are becoming stricter. The states passing laws today include more regulation than the early adopters did.

California voters approved the first law in 1996. The language in Proposition 215 was simple – essentially it said "allow sick people to use pot."

The broadly worded language successfully avoided conflict with federal law, under which marijuana possession remains illegal. But with almost no restrictions, dispensaries flourished. In Los Angeles County alone there are more than 100 places to legally buy pot. And more than 40,000 medical marijuana cards have been issued in California.

In November, California voters will decide whether to go ahead and make this de facto legalization official. A proposition on the ballot will ask voters if they want to make pot legal for adults.

After California passed the law, 13 more states and D.C. also passed medical marijuana laws. Some, like Washington and Oregon, don't allow dispensaries at all. But so far, none have gone to the lengths New Mexico has to regulate medical pot.

The Most Restrictive: New Mexico

New Mexico does allow dispensaries, but only nonprofit ones. And to date, only five have been approved. One of them, NewMexiCann Natural Medicine, is based in an office behind a restaurant in Santa Fe, N.M. Getting a license to grow and distribute marijuana was a seven-month process, according to Executive Director Len Goodman.

With New Mexico's tight regulation of the state's medical marijuana program, it took Len Goodman of NewMexiCann Natural Medicine seven months and a 100-plus page application to get approval to grow and distribute pot.

"What there is is a long checklist: a two-page, single-spaced checklist," he says.

The state wants to know things like: Who will grow the plants? What is their experience? What will the distribution model look like? And then there are more mundane matters, like what the labeling and invoices will look like, Goodman says.

New Mexico limits Goodman to 95 plants. That means demand is always outpacing supply – and that's just how the state wants it. If supply increases too much, there's a risk legal medical marijuana could be diverted to the illegal recreational market.

But that means patients like Dennis Garcia have to go without. He's a broad-shouldered Iraq war veteran who uses marijuana to treat symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.

"Cannabis was the only thing that was really helping me," Garcia says.

Just getting approved to use marijuana was difficult for Garcia. Both a doctor and a psychiatrist had to sign a state form saying traditional treatments failed. They also had to conclude that marijuana would do Garcia more good than harm.

When he couldn't find marijuana through dispensaries, Garcia started growing his own in his garage. To get a license, Garcia had to prove that he could keep his crop secure and promise to follow other regulations.

"It can't be within a certain amount of distance from a school. It can't be seen or visible from the street or any public property," Garcia says.

Getting Marijuana Only To The Sick

All these restrictions are designed to ensure New Mexico's program is for medical use – not a back-door way to legalize pot.

"It's the result of the practical experiences of trying to get away from the California model," says New Mexico State Sen. Cisco McSorley.
Dennis Garcia, a military veteran, grows his own marijuana to treat post-traumatic stress disorder.

Dennis Garcia, a military veteran, grows his own marijuana to treat post-traumatic stress disorder. Garcia first tried to buy pot from a state-licensed grower, but none had any to sell.

McSorley says New Mexico has shown that through strict regulation, medical marijuana can be made available only to the sick. But there is a risk in such active regulation. It's possible a federal prosecutor could charge New Mexico regulators with helping people get access to marijuana.

"My very first goal was that I didn't go to jail and none of my doctors went to jail and nobody in the Department of Health went to jail," says Dr. Alfredo Vigil, secretary of the New Mexico Department of Health.

To date, there's been no interest from federal prosecutors, and New Mexico's law has avoided the California model of dispensaries popping up all over.

"So far there's really not the kind of money to be made that would underwrite proliferation of those kinds of businesses and I'm hoping we can keep it that way," says Vigil.

The Power Of The States

Now New Jersey appears ready to go beyond even New Mexico. Under that state's program, virtually every marijuana bud that's harvested will have been closely monitored by a bureaucrat.

In all of this, there's an interesting civics lesson, says Vanderbilt University law professor Rob Mikos. Federal law – in this case the ban on marijuana possession – always is supreme, but there are times states can choose to go their own way.

"What they're doing is perfectly legitimate," Mikos says. "It's just a passive form of resistance to federal authority."

Mikos says states have traditionally prosecuted nearly all of the marijuana possession cases. Now, in response to their citizens they're actually embracing medical marijuana and the feds aren't doing much about it.

Mikos says when it comes to using marijuana for medical purposes, our culture is changing and the states are leading the way.


NewsHawk: Ganjarden: 420 MAGAZINE
Source: NPR
Author: Jeff Brady
Contact: NPR
Copyright: 2010 NPR
Website: State Medical Marijuana Laws Are Getting Stricter

* Thanks to MedicalNeed for submitting this article
 
This happened to me today:

Judge Leland Harris Dept 107, Van Nuys Division of Los Angeles County court system today decided that the valid recommendation that I brought to court was no good. Judge Harris told me that the court would only accept recommendations from doctors from UCLA, & USC. "He said, "Reputable Doctors" I told him that I was unaware the under California law that their were any distinctions between doctors. He told me, "that there were to many sham doctors out there that will give a recommendation to anyone who wanted it". I would now have to have a good doctor at USC or UCLA agree with the "not" so good or 'Not" good enough doctor that I went to for my evaluation. Then they need to white that down on their letterhead, to be taken to court. This is the equivalent to, "bring me the broom stick of the wicked witch of the west".

I though that this must have been a joke. What did he just say?

I brought for the courts consideration all of my prescriptions. I am on 9 different Rx drugs to deal with a host of ailments. Heart, Cholesterol, Diabetes, Blood Pressure, Depression, Ocular Pressure (Glaucoma)–all of which I brought to the court on UCLA stationary. Judge Harris did not even want to see it. I told him that I had brought them. All he was concerned with was my medical marijuana recommendation, and the doctor from which it came.

I thought there were laws in place to prevent me from having my medical history and medications from being public knowledge. Why is it that the court wants to see more? I use medical marijuana for depression. That is what I told my doctor in 2008 when I got my first medical recommendation and that is what I told my doctor last week when I got my most current recommendation. Is my whole metal health history going to be made a matter of record? The doctor in whom I choose to put my confidence is going to be questioned by a criminal court judge? What if I had not been the one to ask for a court hearing on this matter? What if I had been stopped and sited by a police officer? I would have showed up in front of Judge Harris with my valid, current recommendation–and because it was not written by a doctor that "this" judge recognizes as a "GOOD" doctor I would be treated with no consideration being given to proposition 215.

So what will become of me? I will continue on with my 3 years of probation. As a condition of my probation reading:

Not to use or possess any narcotics, dangerous or restricted drugs or associated paraphernalia, except with valid prescription, and stay away from places where users, buyers or sellers congregate, except in an authorized drug-counseling program.
Now the first time my probation officer wants a urine test to be sure that I am not on speed, or ****** it is going to show that I have been consuming marijuana. My freedom and liberty are at risk if I don't have this second special Judge Leland Harris recommendation from a good doctor at USC or UCLA that says that it is okay from me to use medical marijuana for the treatment of depression. To start with UCLA and USC are medical hospitals. I use medical marijuana for a mental illness. So I would not be able to find a psychiatrist there that is willing to see me and go down the "yellow brick road" of Judge Harris


I am not a rich man. I don't have the money to get a layer. But I know that this is wrong. Now I am really depressed.
 
Back
Top Bottom