Support Growing To Overturn Federal Ban On Pot Usage, Even If It Takes Years

Truth Seeker

New Member
A few House members have begun a broad effort to overturn a 43-year-old federal ban on marijuana and say they're prepared to keep up the pressure even if it takes years.

About 10 lawmakers, mostly liberal Democrats, are writing bills that will serve as legislative guideposts for the future if the GOP-controlled House, as expected, ignores their proposals during this Congress.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., said it's time to end the federal ban because 18 states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana and many other states are exploring that option in response to growing public pressure.

"Maybe next year, maybe next Congress, but this is going to change. And the federal government will get out of the way," he said. "I'm very patient. I've been working on this one way or another for 40 years, and I think the likelihood of something happening in the next four or five years is greater than ever."

Peter Bensinger, a former head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, urged lawmakers to keep the ban despite the pressure to legalize pot.

Advocacy groups have spent a lot of money over the years to push legalization, he said, but they gloss over the negative effects of marijuana. Studies show, he said, that people do get hooked and smoking pot impairs judgment and could cause cancer like cigarettes.

"Legalizing it is going to cost lives, money, addiction, dependency," Bensinger warned.

A number of lawmakers share that view, which is why previous congressional attempts to decriminalize marijuana went nowhere.

Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo., acknowledged that getting any marijuana bill through a bitterly divided Congress – which is consumed by debates over spending, gun regulations and other matters – won't be easy.

"It will take more states moving in the direction Washington and Colorado have before there's a sufficient pressure on (Congress) to change the law," he said. "It's harder to get the attention of members of Congress from states where the legal status has not been changed because it's simply not a relevant issue for their constituents."

MMJ_Law_Map.jpg


News Hawk- TruthSeekr420 420 MAGAZINE
Source: statesmanjournal.com
Author: Raju Chebium
 
Back
Top Bottom