Trouble With Marijuana Arrests

Jacob Bell

New Member
Commissioner Raymond Kelly of the New York Police Department came forth with too little, too late when he issued a memo directing officers not to arrest people caught with small amounts of marijuana unless the drug is in plain public view. A 1977 law decriminalized minor possession, yet tens of thousands are arrested every year.

In 2010, more than 50,000 people were arrested for possession of marijuana; a vast majority of them were racial minorities and male. Civil rights lawyers say that many of them were stopped as part of the Police Department's broad stop-and-frisk practice and were arrested after officers told them to empty their pockets, which brought the drugs into open view.

Commissioner Kelly's memo now makes clear that displaying the drug must be an "activity undertaken of the subject's own volition" and that individuals may not be charged with violating the law if the marijuana "was disclosed to public view at an officer's direction."

While the memo, reported by WNYC last week, is an important step, it does not by itself end the problem. The United States Justice Department and New York lawmakers should investigate the legality of practices that led to the arrests of hundreds of thousands of people since the mid-1990s.

Under New York law, possession of 25 grams or less of marijuana is a violation subject to a $100 fine for the first offense. Possession of any amount that is in public view, however, is a misdemeanor punishable by up to three months in jail and a $500 fine.

This statute was supported by district attorneys in the 1970s because they believed it would free the police to fight serious crimes. That changed in the mid-1990s when the city began emphasizing street stops as an important part of its policing approach. Since 1996, the city has taken more than 536,000 people into custody for the lowest-level marijuana charge, according to Harry Levine, a sociologist at Queens College who has tracked the data closely. From 1981 through 1995, that number was 33,700.

Police have characterized marijuana arrests as important for keeping criminals off the street. But, in testimony submitted to the Legislature this summer, Professor Levine estimated that a significant majority of those arrested in 2010 had never been convicted of any crime, based on an analysis of data reported to the state.

Young African-Americans and Hispanics, who are disproportionately singled-out in street stops, make up a high percentage of people arrested for marijuana possession – despite federal data showing that whites are more likely to consume marijuana. This policing practice has damaged young lives and deserves deeper scrutiny by federal and state monitors.

abb24.jpg


News Hawk- Jacob Ebel 420 MAGAZINE
Source: nytimes.com
Contact: Contact Us
Copyright: The New York Times Company
Website: Trouble With Marijuana Arrests
 
Right on point and saddly a fact of our times. Marijuana is a plant- a plant with healing properties and can be grown anywhere, used by those needing relief from both pain and lifes daily grind.
When will we rise up and tkae to the streets and demand change?:peace:
 
I've never been all that sure that so-called "decriminalization" was a good thing for the cannabis movement. I've had discussions with people - even a couple here - who stated that they were not going to go out of their way to fight for full legalization because "it's only a $100 fine if you get caught."

I can't help but have a suspicion that at least a few legislators who have voted for "decriminalization" did so only because they knew it would slow the legalization movement.

Just to be completely clear, here: I am NOT saying that I want people to go to jail!

How many people here routinely drive at least a few miles per hour over the speed limit? I'm guessing a lot. <SHRUGS> I'm one of them. Hey, the actual likelihood of getting caught is low - kind of like the likelihood of getting caught possessing cannabis - and for small amounts I mean just a few mph over the limit, it's only a fine, right? If the laws in this country were changed so that getting caught going 5mph over the limit would get a person locked up for six months, do you think everyone would suddenly and permanently quit speeding? Yeah, pull the other one - it's got bells on it. There would be an immediate and overwhelming uproar until those laws were changed!

People aren't going to stop speeding. Push them into a corner and they're going to erupt in a frenzy. But... speeding is "decriminalized."

People aren't going to stop consuming cannabis, either.
 
It's just a way to keep the status quo.Free the plant
 
Back
Top Bottom