Cannabis Rx: Cutting Through The Misinformation

MedicalNeed

New Member
If an American doctor of the late 19th century stepped into a time warp and emerged in 2010, he would be shocked by the multitude of pharmaceuticals that today's physicians use. But as he pondered this array (and wondered, as I do, whether most are really necessary), he would soon notice an equally surprising omission, and exclaim, "Where's my Cannabis indica?"

No wonder -- the poor fellow would feel nearly helpless without it. In his day, labor pains, asthma, nervous disorders and even colicky babies were treated with a fluid extract of Cannabis indica, also known as "Indian hemp." (Cannabis is generally seen as having three species -- sativa, indica and ruderalis -- but crossbreeding is common, especially between sativa and indica.) At least 100 scientific papers published in the 19th century backed up such uses.

Then the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 made possession or transfer of Cannabis illegal in the U.S. except for certain medical and industrial uses, which were heavily taxed. The legislation began a long process of making Cannabis use illegal altogether. Many historians have examined this sorry chapter in American legislative history, and the dubious evidence for Cannabis addiction and violent behavior used to secure the bill's passage. "Under the Influence: The Disinformation Guide to Drugs" by Preston Peet makes a persuasive case that the Act's real purpose was to quash the hemp industry, making synthetic fibers more valuable for industrialists who owned the patents.

Meanwhile, as a medical doctor and botanist, my aim has always been to filter out the cultural noise surrounding the genus Cannabis and see it dispassionately: as a plant with bioactivity in human beings that may have therapeutic value. From this perspective, what can it offer us?

As it turns out, a great deal. Research into possible medical uses of Cannabis is enjoying a renaissance. In recent years, studies have shown potential for treating nausea, vomiting, premenstrual syndrome, insomnia, migraines, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, alcohol abuse, collagen-induced arthritis, asthma, atherosclerosis, bipolar disorder, depression, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, sickle-cell disease, sleep apnea, Alzheimer's disease and anorexia nervosa.

But perhaps most exciting, cannabinoids (chemical constituents of Cannabis, the best known being tetrahydrocannabinol or THC) may have a primary role in cancer treatment and prevention. A number of studies have shown that these compounds can inhibit tumor growth in laboratory animal models. In part, this is achieved by inhibiting angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels that tumors need in order to grow. What's more, cannabinoids seem to kill tumor cells without affecting surrounding normal cells. If these findings hold true as research progresses, cannabinoids would demonstrate a huge advantage over conventional chemotherapy agents, which too often destroy normal cells as well as cancer cells.

As long ago as 1975, researchers reported that cannabinoids inhibited the growth of a certain type of lung cancer cell in test tubes and in mice. Since then, laboratory studies have shown that cannabinoids have effects against tumor cells from glioblastoma (a deadly type of brain cancer) as well as those from thyroid cancer¸ leukemia/lymphoma, and skin, uterus, breast, stomach, colorectal, pancreatic and prostate cancers.

So far, the only human test of cannabinoids against cancer was performed in Spain, and was designed to determine if treatment was safe, not whether it was effective. (In studies on humans, such "phase one trials," are focused on establishing the safety of a new drug, as well as the right dosage.) In the Spanish study, reported in 2006, the dose was administered intracranially, directly into the tumors of patients with recurrent brain cancer. The investigation established the safety of the dose and showed that the compound used decreased cell proliferation in at least two of nine patients studied.

It is not clear that smoking marijuana achieves blood levels high enough to have these anticancer effects. We need more human research, including well-designed studies to find the best mode of administration.

If you want to learn more about this subject, I recommend an excellent documentary film, "What If Cannabis Cured Cancer," by Len Richmond, which summarizes the remarkable research findings of recent years. Most medical doctors are not aware of this information and its implications for cancer prevention and treatment. The film presents compelling evidence that our current policy on Cannabis is counterproductive.

Another reliable source of information is the chapter on cannabinoids and cancer in "Integrative Oncology" (Oxford University Press, 2009), a textbook I edited with integrative oncologist Donald I. Abrams, M.D. (Learn more about integrative cancer treatment from Dr. Abrams.)

After more than 70 years of misinformation about this botanical remedy, I am delighted that we are finally gaining a mature understanding of its immense therapeutic potential.

Andrew Weil, M.D., invites you to join the conversation: become a fan on Facebook, follow him on Twitter, and check out his Daily Health Tips Blog. Dr. Weil is the founder and director of the Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine and the editorial director of DrWeil.com - Official Website of Andrew Weil, M.D..


NewsHawk: MedicalNeed: 420 MAGAZINE
Source: Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post
Author: Andrew Weil, M.D.
Contact: Contact us
Copyright: 2010 HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.
Website:Dr. Andrew Weil: Cannabis Rx: Cutting Through the Misinformation
 
Any one who thinks you can just walk in to a Dr and get medical marijuana prescribed without a exam even in California is mistaken at least this was my experience this week. We were given through exams and a explanation of do's and don'ts only to find out my wife needed a copy of our marriage license for the CA DMV we have been married for 16 years not something we have on hand normally. In this instance though she had packed it or what we thought was it NO denied not an official copy. If this was vicodin or percoset or anything else we could have went to any pharmacy, taken them and drove home something is not right.
 
Could you have gotten your MO. local to fax the CA. DMV the required documents? Just a thought.

They wanted a certified copy we had a copy that's what was so crazy they wouldn't do that. I know people who have never had a certified copy me being one of them. Were good now she just got the certified copy but damm really who would have thought? Who ever needed they're marriage license for medication like I said, drivers license from MO, birth certificate, job ID, lease for our house in CA, and a copy of our marriage certificate but no.....it was more the DMV the dispensaries wanted to help but didn't want to place themselves at risk understandably.


My point was that I have gotten Percocet and Vicodin way easier in almost all cases. No wonder prescription drug abuse is so high the market is flooded with the crap...if I wanted that all I have to do is show my ID give my prescription to them and I'm out....we were rejected everywhere...I'm glad in a way because it was nice to see everyone following the rules which is great!! I applaud the Palm Springs area dispensaries for being strait and not being part of the problem:cheer:

That being said (give me my herb dammit) I brought some of my own so no real worries, good thing too. Seriously we have been planning this move for months and I couldn't wait and BAM right in the nuts I really wanted to peep out what people were doing down there Fuuuuck. Oh well I guess it will be October for the DR till I'm totally moved......CCOC smelled real good though!
 
Back
Top Bottom