Jacob Bell
New Member
Katherine H. Taber, Ph.D. and Robin A. Hurley, M.D.
Drs. Taber and Hurley are affiliated with the Veterans Affairs Mid Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, and the Research and Education Service Line at the W.G. Hefner Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Salisbury, N.C. Dr. Taber is affiliated with the Division of Biomedical Sciences at the Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine in Blacksburg, Va., and the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. Dr. Hurley is affiliated with the Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., and the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. Address correspondence to Dr. Robin Hurley, Hefner VA Medical Center, 1601 Brenner Ave., Salisbury, NC 28144; Robin.Hurley@va.gov (e-mail)., © 2009 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
Cannabis sativa (hemp) is a flowering annual that has been in use as a structural material (cordage, cloth, paper) and in medicine for thousands of years.5—7 Reference to the psychoactive effects of its phytochemical products have been found in writing throughout the ancient world. Cannabis herb (marijuana) is made by drying the leaves and flowering tops. Cannabis resin (hashish) is made by collecting the fluid secreted by the plant during the flowering phase. A recent review indicates that studies of this plant have identified more than 500 compounds within the plant.6 The principle psychoactive cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa are {Delta}8 and {Delta}9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).6,7 {Delta}9 THC is considered the major psychoactive constituent as it is considerably more abundant in the plant and more potent in effect. The amount of {Delta}9 THC varies greatly across plant strains and is also affected by farming and preparation techniques.8 Studies suggest an increasing content of {Delta}9 THC in street cannabis over the past few decades (e.g., ~1.5% in 1980, 4.47% in 1997, 5.11% in 2002).8 {Delta}9 THC is converted to 11-hydroxy-{Delta}9 THC in the lungs and liver.7 Onset of action depends on both dose and method of administration. Following ingestion by smoking, initial effects may appear within the first minute, whereas following oral ingestion first effects may appear in 15—30 minutes.8,9 Onset, duration and nature of action (pleasant versus unpleasant) are affected by other factors, as well, such as individual differences in absorption, method of smoking, previous history, anxiety level, and environmental context.8,10 Early acute effects commonly include light-headedness and euphoria, with some individuals experiencing tachycardia and hypotension. Later acute effects may include time dilation, relaxation, increased body awareness, increased appetite, sleepiness, impaired memory, and impaired concentration.7—9,11 Adverse reactions do occur (e.g., anxiety, panic, paranoia, psychotic symptoms), but are much less common.8,9,11,12 Functional imaging studies indicate that intoxication is associated with increased regional cerebral blood flow and metabolism, particularly in frontal and limbic regions as well as the cerebellum.8 Both tolerance and dependence can develop with chronic use.9,11—13 Withdrawal is characterized by nervousness, tension, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. While long-term cognitive impairment has been reported in some studies, the evidence for this is not strong.7—9,11,12 Some studies support an influence of cannabis use on the development of psychiatric disorders, particularly schizophrenia and mood disorders.11,12,14
A surge in research into the mechanism of action for {Delta}9 THC in the brain followed its isolation and identification in the 1960s.6 This led to the identification of endogenous cannabinoid (endocannabinoid) receptors in brain tissue. Research intensified following the cloning of these receptors (CB1 and CB2) in the early 1990s.6,7,15,16 Identification of the first endocannabinoid, N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide, from the Sanskrit for "eternal bliss") was achieved soon after.6 A decade later the modulatory action of endocannabinoids at synapses was discovered.17 Both the CB1 and CB2 receptors are cell surface proteins that span the membrane and are coupled intracellularly to one of the G-proteins.7,16—18 The distributions and actions of the CB1 and CB2 receptors are quite different.6,7,9,15—19 CB1 receptors are located predominately on axon terminals in both the central and peripheral nervous system and on some peripheral tissues (e.g., liver, gut, adrenal, muscle, fat). CB2 receptors are found principally peripherally on immune cells (e.g., spleen, macrophages, tonsils, monocytes, neutrophils), and were originally not thought to occur in the brain. More recently they have been identified on both neurons and glial cells, where they may participate in immune functions.6,7,9,17,20—22 This article will focus on the CB1 receptor and compounds that interact with it, as this system mediates most or all of the psychotropic actions of cannabinoids.
Studies of the endocannabinoid system support its importance for multiple aspects of brain function including modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, regulation of mood, anxiety, and reward, and extinction of fear learning.10,13 It also participates in the immune, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems.9,23 Present medicinal uses of compounds that interact with this system include analgesia, suppression of chemotherapy-induced nausea, appetite stimulant for illness and medication-related weight loss, reducing motor symptoms (e.g., spasticity, ataxia, weakness) in multiple sclerosis, and reduction of intraocular pressure in glaucoma.6,9,13,15,19
CB1 Receptor Distribution and Actions
A recent meta-analysis of studies related to ligand binding affinity and receptor distribution for the CB1 receptor indicates important differences between species and among analytic techniques.24 In vitro binding studies for the CB1 receptor found differences in binding potential from many factors including tissue state (e.g., brain sections versus brain homogenates), tissue type (e.g., native versus transfected cells), and species. Receptor distribution also varied by method, with in situ hybridization differing considerably from autoradiographic and immunocytochemical studies, which were in rough agreement. Of particular importance, ordering brain structures by receptor density resulted in different rank ordering in human and rat.24 Maps of the approximate regional cannabinoid receptor density in primate (human and nonhuman) brain is illustrated in the cover art and Figure 1.1—4 The relative sensitivities of GABA-ergic and glutaminergic neurons may also vary by species.15 Endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids) for the CB1 receptor act presynaptically to inhibit release of a wide range of neurotransmitters including glutamate, acetylcholine, norepinephrine, and GABA (Figure 2).7,15,25 These compounds are not synthesized in advance and stored. Rather, they are synthesized in the postsynaptic cell in response to depolarization. This is thus an "on-demand" system, with synthesis occurring only when and where it is required.10 Endocannabinoids are released by an unknown mechanism and diffuse across the synapse to activate receptors located on the axon terminal, suppressing neuronal excitability and inhibiting neurotransmission. They are inactivated rapidly by uptake (possibly carrier mediated) followed by intracellular hydrolysis [fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL)].6,7,10,15,18,26 The two most studied endocannabinoids are anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). Both anandamide and {Delta}9 THC are low intrinsic activity (partial) agonists for the CB1 receptor. 2-AG is a high intrinsic activity (full) agonist.16 Of particular importance, synthetic compounds delivered systemically may not have the same effects as endogenous compounds, as they lack both spatial and temporal specificity.10,27 This may be one reason why some studies have found a bell-shaped or biphasic relationship between dose and effect, with high doses often having the opposite effect of low doses.10,14,27,28
The potential interactions between ligands and receptors are complex.15,16 Most receptors have both active and inactive conformations. If a particular ligand favors the active conformation of the receptor it is considered to have high intrinsic activity (full agonist). If a ligand does not favor the active conformation then at the same level of receptor occupancy there will be a lower level of activation because some receptors will be in the active state while others will be in the inactive state. Such a ligand is considered to have low intrinsic activity (partial agonist). A third type of interaction is possible in the endocannabinoid system, because at least some portions of it are tonically active. Thus a ligand can actually decrease activity below normal levels (inverse agonist). In addition, particular ligands are able to activate one signaling pathway more than another. This is referred to as agonist-directed trafficking or functional selectivity. Thus, different agonists may favor coupling to different G proteins.
The endocannabinoids are neuromodulatory compounds that provide feedback inhibition via CB1 receptors and are integral to many types of synaptic plasticity.10,17,18 The first to be identified were depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) in the hippocampus and depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE) in the cerebellum.17 Endocannabinoid synthesis is stimulated by the increased intracellular calcium that occurs as a result of depolarization of the postsynaptic dendrite for both DSI and DSE, which occur widely in the brain.18 Activation of metabotropic glutamate or muscarinic receptors can also stimulate endocannabinoid synthesis at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. These have been termed metabotropic suppression of inhibition (MSI) and metabotropic suppression of excitation (MSE).18 Although not dependent on a postsynaptic increase in calcium, both MSE and MSI are enhanced by increased calcium and thus may serve as coincidence detectors. An alternative name for this type of plasticity is endocannabinoid-mediated short-term depression (eCB-STD).17 Endocannabinoids also mediate some types of long-term depression (LTD) in multiple areas, including hippocampus, dorsal striatum, ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens), cerebellum, and prefrontal cortex.17,18,29 Endocannabinoids can also act on somatic receptors, activating potassium channels, thus depolarizing the neuron and inhibiting action potential generation.17,18
Stress, Emotional Regulation, and Homeostasis
The term 'stress' generally indicates an internal (i.e., infection, psychological condition) or external (i.e., physical danger or damage) circumstance that threatens the homeostasis of the organism. Thus, stress results in a discrepancy, either real or perceived, between the demands of a situation and the organism's resources.30
Fear is an adaptive component of the acute stress response to potentially dangerous stimuli which threaten the integrity of the individual. However, when disproportional in intensity, chronic, irreversible and/or not associated with any actual risk, it constitutes a maladaptive response and may be symptomatic of an anxiety-related neuropsychiatric disorder such as generalized anxiety, phobia, or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), among others.10
The endocannabinoid system participates in multiple brain circuits implicated in neuropsychiatric conditions such as those modulating stress reactions, learning, and extinction of fear, emotional regulation, and reward processes.31,32 CB1 receptors are found in many areas involved in regulation of the stress response including the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, corticotroph cells in the pituitary, adrenal glands, and limbic-related areas of the brain.30 Endocannabinoids inhibit the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and may well provide an ongoing basal level of inhibition. During acute stress, corticotrophin releasing factor is released into the portal system by neurons in the paraventricular nucleus. Corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) induces release of adrenocorticotrophic hormone from the anterior pituitary. Adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulates production of glucocorticoids (e.g., corticosterone) in the adrenal gland. Glucocorticoids, in turn, inhibit release of corticotrophin releasing factor in the hypothalamus and adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) in the pituitary. Negative feedback in the hypothalamus is mediated by glucocorticoid-stimulated synthesis and release of endocannabinoids within the paraventricular nucleus.10,25,30 Thus, endocannabinoids are released in response to activity in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and serve to bring it back toward its baseline (prestress) state.10
Animal studies indicate that neither acute stress nor chronic predictable stress (which will habituate) alter CB1 receptor density or affinity in the brain.33 Both chronic unpredictable stress (which does not habituate) and chronic administration of corticosterone, on the other hand, decrease CB1 receptor density in the hippocampus.33 These stress conditions also differentially alter the content of 2-AG and anandamide of many brain regions. Some studies support the theory that a progressive increase of 2-AG and decrease of anandamide within limbic-related brain areas (e.g., medial prefrontal cortex, limbic forebrain, amygdala, hypothalamus) may, in part, mediate behavioral habituation to chronic predictable stress.33 An opposite pattern (increased anandamide, decreased 2-AG) is seen in the ventral striatum, which may have implications for endocannabinoid-mediated facilitation of reward.33 An antidepressant-like effect (as indicated by enhanced stress-coping behaviors and decreased anhedonic behaviors), has been reported for both compounds that directly activate CB1 receptors and those that prolong the action of naturally released endocannabinoids (e.g., inhibit uptake, inhibit hydrolysis).28 Animal studies of social defeat stress (which produces symptoms of anxiety and depression) indicate that it decreases CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of GABA (but not glutamate) neurotransmission in the striatum.34 This change occurs as a result of stress-induced increases in glucocorticoids, and can be reversed by both natural rewards (e.g., access to sucrose) and administration of drugs with rewarding properties (e.g., cocaine).34 An important role for the endocannabinoid system in reward-related processes is likely. CB1 receptor-activation modulates dopamine signaling in both the ventral tegmental area and the ventral striatum.13,29 CB1 receptors also participate in LTD at glutaminergic synapses in both dorsal and ventral striatum.29 It has been proposed that the endocannabinoid system provides the common neurobiological mechanism underlying both the rewarding aspects of drugs of abuse and relapse, suggesting that blockade of CB1 receptors may have therapeutic potential.13,35 Studies also support the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in extinction of conditioned fear.10,25,28 Endocannabinoid content of the amygdala is increased following exposure to the conditioned stimulus (e.g., tone previously paired to foot shock).25,28 Removal of the influence of CB1 receptors (either by pharmacological blockade or by genetic manipulation) impairs extinction of conditioned fear.27,28 Extinction is enhanced by administration of compounds that directly activate CB1 receptors or prolong the action of naturally released endocannabinoids (e.g., inhibit uptake, inhibit hydrolysis).10,27,28
There is growing evidence that another important function of the endocannabinoid system is regulation of energy balance, both in terms of influencing appetite and by modulating metabolism.36—39 Both central and peripheral actions are likely to be involved. CB1 receptors are present in hypothalamic areas (e.g., mediobasal, paraventricular, lateral) integral to balancing energy intake with energy expenditure.38 Endocannabinoid levels in the hypothalamus are increased by starvation and decreased by food intake.36 In rats, food intake is increased following administration of endocannabinoids to either the hypothalamus or mesolimbic forebrain.36 In addition, studies in both humans and animals have found that that blockade of CB1 receptors normalizes several metabolic parameters that are risk factors for metabolic syndrome (e.g., decreased triglycerides and insulin resistance, increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) in excess of what would be expected from weight loss alone, supporting a role in glucose homeostasis and adipose tissue metabolism.36—40 Research suggests that this system may be overactive in conditions such as obesity and hyperglycemia.36,38,39,41 CB1 receptor activation increases fatty acid synthesis in the liver as well as lipid synthesis by adipose tissue, and obesity is associated with increases in CB1 receptors in both adipose tissue and skeletal muscle.36
CONCLUSION
The involvement of the endocannabinoid system in multiple aspects of brain function provides new targets for the development of novel therapeutic agents for a wide range of psychiatric disorders.9,14 Potential applications include treatment of mood and anxiety disorders, degenerative conditions, and acquired brain injuries.9,10,14,19,23,25,42—46 In addition to receptor ligands (both agonists and antagonists), a number of compounds have been developed that prolong endocannabinoid action, either by inhibiting uptake or by decreasing hydrolysis.6,9,15,26 One challenge is to develop agents that are both selective and safe. The difficulty in achieving this has recently been driven home by the European Medicines Agency's decision to suspend sales of rimonabant (CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist), approved 2 years ago for the treatment of obesity, citing adverse psychiatric effects.47
References:
Source including Charts, Graphs and Figures: Endocannabinoids: Stress, Anxiety, and Fear
Drs. Taber and Hurley are affiliated with the Veterans Affairs Mid Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, and the Research and Education Service Line at the W.G. Hefner Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Salisbury, N.C. Dr. Taber is affiliated with the Division of Biomedical Sciences at the Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine in Blacksburg, Va., and the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. Dr. Hurley is affiliated with the Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., and the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. Address correspondence to Dr. Robin Hurley, Hefner VA Medical Center, 1601 Brenner Ave., Salisbury, NC 28144; Robin.Hurley@va.gov (e-mail)., © 2009 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
Cannabis sativa (hemp) is a flowering annual that has been in use as a structural material (cordage, cloth, paper) and in medicine for thousands of years.5—7 Reference to the psychoactive effects of its phytochemical products have been found in writing throughout the ancient world. Cannabis herb (marijuana) is made by drying the leaves and flowering tops. Cannabis resin (hashish) is made by collecting the fluid secreted by the plant during the flowering phase. A recent review indicates that studies of this plant have identified more than 500 compounds within the plant.6 The principle psychoactive cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa are {Delta}8 and {Delta}9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).6,7 {Delta}9 THC is considered the major psychoactive constituent as it is considerably more abundant in the plant and more potent in effect. The amount of {Delta}9 THC varies greatly across plant strains and is also affected by farming and preparation techniques.8 Studies suggest an increasing content of {Delta}9 THC in street cannabis over the past few decades (e.g., ~1.5% in 1980, 4.47% in 1997, 5.11% in 2002).8 {Delta}9 THC is converted to 11-hydroxy-{Delta}9 THC in the lungs and liver.7 Onset of action depends on both dose and method of administration. Following ingestion by smoking, initial effects may appear within the first minute, whereas following oral ingestion first effects may appear in 15—30 minutes.8,9 Onset, duration and nature of action (pleasant versus unpleasant) are affected by other factors, as well, such as individual differences in absorption, method of smoking, previous history, anxiety level, and environmental context.8,10 Early acute effects commonly include light-headedness and euphoria, with some individuals experiencing tachycardia and hypotension. Later acute effects may include time dilation, relaxation, increased body awareness, increased appetite, sleepiness, impaired memory, and impaired concentration.7—9,11 Adverse reactions do occur (e.g., anxiety, panic, paranoia, psychotic symptoms), but are much less common.8,9,11,12 Functional imaging studies indicate that intoxication is associated with increased regional cerebral blood flow and metabolism, particularly in frontal and limbic regions as well as the cerebellum.8 Both tolerance and dependence can develop with chronic use.9,11—13 Withdrawal is characterized by nervousness, tension, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. While long-term cognitive impairment has been reported in some studies, the evidence for this is not strong.7—9,11,12 Some studies support an influence of cannabis use on the development of psychiatric disorders, particularly schizophrenia and mood disorders.11,12,14
A surge in research into the mechanism of action for {Delta}9 THC in the brain followed its isolation and identification in the 1960s.6 This led to the identification of endogenous cannabinoid (endocannabinoid) receptors in brain tissue. Research intensified following the cloning of these receptors (CB1 and CB2) in the early 1990s.6,7,15,16 Identification of the first endocannabinoid, N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide, from the Sanskrit for "eternal bliss") was achieved soon after.6 A decade later the modulatory action of endocannabinoids at synapses was discovered.17 Both the CB1 and CB2 receptors are cell surface proteins that span the membrane and are coupled intracellularly to one of the G-proteins.7,16—18 The distributions and actions of the CB1 and CB2 receptors are quite different.6,7,9,15—19 CB1 receptors are located predominately on axon terminals in both the central and peripheral nervous system and on some peripheral tissues (e.g., liver, gut, adrenal, muscle, fat). CB2 receptors are found principally peripherally on immune cells (e.g., spleen, macrophages, tonsils, monocytes, neutrophils), and were originally not thought to occur in the brain. More recently they have been identified on both neurons and glial cells, where they may participate in immune functions.6,7,9,17,20—22 This article will focus on the CB1 receptor and compounds that interact with it, as this system mediates most or all of the psychotropic actions of cannabinoids.
Studies of the endocannabinoid system support its importance for multiple aspects of brain function including modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, regulation of mood, anxiety, and reward, and extinction of fear learning.10,13 It also participates in the immune, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems.9,23 Present medicinal uses of compounds that interact with this system include analgesia, suppression of chemotherapy-induced nausea, appetite stimulant for illness and medication-related weight loss, reducing motor symptoms (e.g., spasticity, ataxia, weakness) in multiple sclerosis, and reduction of intraocular pressure in glaucoma.6,9,13,15,19
CB1 Receptor Distribution and Actions
A recent meta-analysis of studies related to ligand binding affinity and receptor distribution for the CB1 receptor indicates important differences between species and among analytic techniques.24 In vitro binding studies for the CB1 receptor found differences in binding potential from many factors including tissue state (e.g., brain sections versus brain homogenates), tissue type (e.g., native versus transfected cells), and species. Receptor distribution also varied by method, with in situ hybridization differing considerably from autoradiographic and immunocytochemical studies, which were in rough agreement. Of particular importance, ordering brain structures by receptor density resulted in different rank ordering in human and rat.24 Maps of the approximate regional cannabinoid receptor density in primate (human and nonhuman) brain is illustrated in the cover art and Figure 1.1—4 The relative sensitivities of GABA-ergic and glutaminergic neurons may also vary by species.15 Endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids) for the CB1 receptor act presynaptically to inhibit release of a wide range of neurotransmitters including glutamate, acetylcholine, norepinephrine, and GABA (Figure 2).7,15,25 These compounds are not synthesized in advance and stored. Rather, they are synthesized in the postsynaptic cell in response to depolarization. This is thus an "on-demand" system, with synthesis occurring only when and where it is required.10 Endocannabinoids are released by an unknown mechanism and diffuse across the synapse to activate receptors located on the axon terminal, suppressing neuronal excitability and inhibiting neurotransmission. They are inactivated rapidly by uptake (possibly carrier mediated) followed by intracellular hydrolysis [fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL)].6,7,10,15,18,26 The two most studied endocannabinoids are anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). Both anandamide and {Delta}9 THC are low intrinsic activity (partial) agonists for the CB1 receptor. 2-AG is a high intrinsic activity (full) agonist.16 Of particular importance, synthetic compounds delivered systemically may not have the same effects as endogenous compounds, as they lack both spatial and temporal specificity.10,27 This may be one reason why some studies have found a bell-shaped or biphasic relationship between dose and effect, with high doses often having the opposite effect of low doses.10,14,27,28
The potential interactions between ligands and receptors are complex.15,16 Most receptors have both active and inactive conformations. If a particular ligand favors the active conformation of the receptor it is considered to have high intrinsic activity (full agonist). If a ligand does not favor the active conformation then at the same level of receptor occupancy there will be a lower level of activation because some receptors will be in the active state while others will be in the inactive state. Such a ligand is considered to have low intrinsic activity (partial agonist). A third type of interaction is possible in the endocannabinoid system, because at least some portions of it are tonically active. Thus a ligand can actually decrease activity below normal levels (inverse agonist). In addition, particular ligands are able to activate one signaling pathway more than another. This is referred to as agonist-directed trafficking or functional selectivity. Thus, different agonists may favor coupling to different G proteins.
The endocannabinoids are neuromodulatory compounds that provide feedback inhibition via CB1 receptors and are integral to many types of synaptic plasticity.10,17,18 The first to be identified were depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) in the hippocampus and depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE) in the cerebellum.17 Endocannabinoid synthesis is stimulated by the increased intracellular calcium that occurs as a result of depolarization of the postsynaptic dendrite for both DSI and DSE, which occur widely in the brain.18 Activation of metabotropic glutamate or muscarinic receptors can also stimulate endocannabinoid synthesis at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. These have been termed metabotropic suppression of inhibition (MSI) and metabotropic suppression of excitation (MSE).18 Although not dependent on a postsynaptic increase in calcium, both MSE and MSI are enhanced by increased calcium and thus may serve as coincidence detectors. An alternative name for this type of plasticity is endocannabinoid-mediated short-term depression (eCB-STD).17 Endocannabinoids also mediate some types of long-term depression (LTD) in multiple areas, including hippocampus, dorsal striatum, ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens), cerebellum, and prefrontal cortex.17,18,29 Endocannabinoids can also act on somatic receptors, activating potassium channels, thus depolarizing the neuron and inhibiting action potential generation.17,18
Stress, Emotional Regulation, and Homeostasis
The term 'stress' generally indicates an internal (i.e., infection, psychological condition) or external (i.e., physical danger or damage) circumstance that threatens the homeostasis of the organism. Thus, stress results in a discrepancy, either real or perceived, between the demands of a situation and the organism's resources.30
Fear is an adaptive component of the acute stress response to potentially dangerous stimuli which threaten the integrity of the individual. However, when disproportional in intensity, chronic, irreversible and/or not associated with any actual risk, it constitutes a maladaptive response and may be symptomatic of an anxiety-related neuropsychiatric disorder such as generalized anxiety, phobia, or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), among others.10
The endocannabinoid system participates in multiple brain circuits implicated in neuropsychiatric conditions such as those modulating stress reactions, learning, and extinction of fear, emotional regulation, and reward processes.31,32 CB1 receptors are found in many areas involved in regulation of the stress response including the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, corticotroph cells in the pituitary, adrenal glands, and limbic-related areas of the brain.30 Endocannabinoids inhibit the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and may well provide an ongoing basal level of inhibition. During acute stress, corticotrophin releasing factor is released into the portal system by neurons in the paraventricular nucleus. Corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) induces release of adrenocorticotrophic hormone from the anterior pituitary. Adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulates production of glucocorticoids (e.g., corticosterone) in the adrenal gland. Glucocorticoids, in turn, inhibit release of corticotrophin releasing factor in the hypothalamus and adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) in the pituitary. Negative feedback in the hypothalamus is mediated by glucocorticoid-stimulated synthesis and release of endocannabinoids within the paraventricular nucleus.10,25,30 Thus, endocannabinoids are released in response to activity in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and serve to bring it back toward its baseline (prestress) state.10
Animal studies indicate that neither acute stress nor chronic predictable stress (which will habituate) alter CB1 receptor density or affinity in the brain.33 Both chronic unpredictable stress (which does not habituate) and chronic administration of corticosterone, on the other hand, decrease CB1 receptor density in the hippocampus.33 These stress conditions also differentially alter the content of 2-AG and anandamide of many brain regions. Some studies support the theory that a progressive increase of 2-AG and decrease of anandamide within limbic-related brain areas (e.g., medial prefrontal cortex, limbic forebrain, amygdala, hypothalamus) may, in part, mediate behavioral habituation to chronic predictable stress.33 An opposite pattern (increased anandamide, decreased 2-AG) is seen in the ventral striatum, which may have implications for endocannabinoid-mediated facilitation of reward.33 An antidepressant-like effect (as indicated by enhanced stress-coping behaviors and decreased anhedonic behaviors), has been reported for both compounds that directly activate CB1 receptors and those that prolong the action of naturally released endocannabinoids (e.g., inhibit uptake, inhibit hydrolysis).28 Animal studies of social defeat stress (which produces symptoms of anxiety and depression) indicate that it decreases CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of GABA (but not glutamate) neurotransmission in the striatum.34 This change occurs as a result of stress-induced increases in glucocorticoids, and can be reversed by both natural rewards (e.g., access to sucrose) and administration of drugs with rewarding properties (e.g., cocaine).34 An important role for the endocannabinoid system in reward-related processes is likely. CB1 receptor-activation modulates dopamine signaling in both the ventral tegmental area and the ventral striatum.13,29 CB1 receptors also participate in LTD at glutaminergic synapses in both dorsal and ventral striatum.29 It has been proposed that the endocannabinoid system provides the common neurobiological mechanism underlying both the rewarding aspects of drugs of abuse and relapse, suggesting that blockade of CB1 receptors may have therapeutic potential.13,35 Studies also support the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in extinction of conditioned fear.10,25,28 Endocannabinoid content of the amygdala is increased following exposure to the conditioned stimulus (e.g., tone previously paired to foot shock).25,28 Removal of the influence of CB1 receptors (either by pharmacological blockade or by genetic manipulation) impairs extinction of conditioned fear.27,28 Extinction is enhanced by administration of compounds that directly activate CB1 receptors or prolong the action of naturally released endocannabinoids (e.g., inhibit uptake, inhibit hydrolysis).10,27,28
There is growing evidence that another important function of the endocannabinoid system is regulation of energy balance, both in terms of influencing appetite and by modulating metabolism.36—39 Both central and peripheral actions are likely to be involved. CB1 receptors are present in hypothalamic areas (e.g., mediobasal, paraventricular, lateral) integral to balancing energy intake with energy expenditure.38 Endocannabinoid levels in the hypothalamus are increased by starvation and decreased by food intake.36 In rats, food intake is increased following administration of endocannabinoids to either the hypothalamus or mesolimbic forebrain.36 In addition, studies in both humans and animals have found that that blockade of CB1 receptors normalizes several metabolic parameters that are risk factors for metabolic syndrome (e.g., decreased triglycerides and insulin resistance, increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) in excess of what would be expected from weight loss alone, supporting a role in glucose homeostasis and adipose tissue metabolism.36—40 Research suggests that this system may be overactive in conditions such as obesity and hyperglycemia.36,38,39,41 CB1 receptor activation increases fatty acid synthesis in the liver as well as lipid synthesis by adipose tissue, and obesity is associated with increases in CB1 receptors in both adipose tissue and skeletal muscle.36
CONCLUSION
The involvement of the endocannabinoid system in multiple aspects of brain function provides new targets for the development of novel therapeutic agents for a wide range of psychiatric disorders.9,14 Potential applications include treatment of mood and anxiety disorders, degenerative conditions, and acquired brain injuries.9,10,14,19,23,25,42—46 In addition to receptor ligands (both agonists and antagonists), a number of compounds have been developed that prolong endocannabinoid action, either by inhibiting uptake or by decreasing hydrolysis.6,9,15,26 One challenge is to develop agents that are both selective and safe. The difficulty in achieving this has recently been driven home by the European Medicines Agency's decision to suspend sales of rimonabant (CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist), approved 2 years ago for the treatment of obesity, citing adverse psychiatric effects.47
References:
- Herkenham M, Lynn AB, Little MD, et al: Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:1932—1936
- Westlake TM, Howlett AC, Bonner TI, et al: Cannabinoid receptor binding and messenger RNA expression in human brain: an in vitro receptor autoradiography and in situ hybridization histochemistry study of normal aged and Alzheimer's brains. Neuroscience 1994; 63:637—652
- Glass M, Dragunow M, Faull RLM: Cannabinoid receptors in the human brain: a detailed anatomical and quantitative autoradiographic study in the fetal, neonatal and adult human brain. Neuroscience 1997; 77:299—318
- Eggan SM, Lewis DA: Immunocytochemical distribution of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor in the primate neocortex: a regional and laminar analysis. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17:175—191
- Abel EL: Marijuana: The First Twelve Thousand Years. New York, Plenum Press, 1980
- Hanus LO: Pharmacological and therapeutic secrets of plant and brain (endo)cannabinoids. Med Res Rev 2009; 29:213—271
- Svizenska I, Dubovy P, Sulcova A: Cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2), their distribution, ligands and functional involvement in nervous system structures: a short review. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2008; 90:501—511
- Gonzalez R: Acute and non-acute effects of cannabis on brain functioning and neuropsychological performance. Neuropsychol Rev 2007; 17:347—361
- Grant I, Cahn BR: Cannabis and endocannabinoid modulators: therapeutic promises and challenges. Clin Neurosci Res 2005; 5:185—199
- Viveros M-P, Marco E-M, Llorente R, et al: Endocannabinoid system and synaptic plasticity: implications for emotional responses. Neural Plast 2007; 2007:52908
- Iversen L: Cannabis and the brain. Brain 2003; 126:1252—1270
- Kalant H: Adverse effects of cannabis on health: an update of the literature since 1996. Prog Neuropsyopharmacol Bio Psychiatry 2004; 28:849—863
- Fattore L, Fadda P, Spano MS, et al: Neurobiological mechanisms of cannabinoid addiction. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2008; 286S:S97-S107
- Leweke F, Koethe D: Cannabis and psychiatric disorders: it is not only addiction. Addict Biol 2008; 13:264—275
- Pertwee RG: Ligands that target cannabinoid receptors in the brain: from THC to anandamide and beyond. Addict Biol 2008; 13:147—159
- Mackie K: Cannabinoid receptors: where they are and what they do. J Neuroendocrinol 2008; 20:10—14
- Kano M, Ohno-Shosaku T, Hashimotodani Y, et al: Endocannabinoid-mediated control of synaptic transmission. Physiol Rev 2009; 89:309—380
- Mackie K: Signaling via CNS cannabinoid receptors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2008; 286S:S60-S65
- Karanian DA, Bahr BA: Cannabinoid drugs and enhancement of endocannabinoid responses: strategies for a wide array of disease states. Curr Mol Med 2006; 6:677—684
- Nunez E, Benito C, Pazos MR, et al: Cannabinoid CB2 receptors are expressed by perivascular microglial cells in the human brain: an immunohistochemical study. Synapse 2004; 53:208—213
- Onaivi ES, Ishiguro H, Gong J-P, et al: Discovery of the presence and functional expression of cannabinoid CB2 receptors in brain. Ann NY Acad Sci 2006; 1074:514—536
- Stella N: Endocannabinoid signaling in microglial cells. Neuropharmacology 2009; 56:244—253
- Micale V, Mazzola C, Drago F: Endocannabinoids and neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol Res 2007; 56:382—392
- McPartland JM, Glass M, Pertwee RG: Meta-analysis of cannabinoid ligand binding affinity and receptor distribution: interspecies differences. Br J Pharmacol 2007; 152:583—593
- Bisogno T, Di Marzo V: Short- and long-term plasticity of the endocannabinoid system in neuropsychiataric and neurological disorders. Pharmacol Res 2007; 56:428—442
- Bisogno T: Endogenous cannabinoids: structure and metabolism. J Neuroendocrinol 2008; 20:1—9
- Lafenetre P, Chaouloff F, Marsicano G: The endocannabinoid system in the processing of anxiety and fear and how CB1 receptors may modulate fear extinction. Pharmacol Res 2007; 56:367—381
- Moreira FA, Lutz B: The endocannabinoid system: emotion, learning, and addiction. Addict Biol 2008; 13:196—212
- Lupica CR, Riegel AC, Hoffman AF: Marijuana and cannabinoid regulation of brain reward circuits. Br J Pharmacol 2004; 143:227—234
- Cota D: The role of the endocannabinoid system in the regulation of hypthalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. J Neuroendocrinol 2008; 20:35—38
- Akirav I, Maroun M: The role of the medial prefrontal cortex-amygdala circuit in stress effects on the extinction of fear. Neural Plast 2007; 2007:30873
- Jankord R, Herman JP: Limbic regulation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical function during acute and chronic stress. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008; 1148:64—73
- Patel S, Hillard CJ: Adaptations in endocannabinoid signaling in response to repeated homotypic stress: a novel mechanism for stress habituation. Eur J Neurosci 2008; 27:2821—2829
- Rossi S, DeChiara V, Musella A, et al: Chronic psychoemotional stress impairs cannabinoid receptor-mediated control of GABA transmission in the striatum. J Neurosci 2008; 28:7284—7292
- Onaivi ES: An endocannabinoid hypothesis of drug reward and drug addiction. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008; 1139:412—421
- Kunos G: Understanding metabolic homeostasis and imbalance: what is the role of the endocannabinoid system? Am J Med 2007; 120:S18-S24
- Piomelli D: The element of surprise. Nat Med 2008; 14:720—721
- Matias I, Petrosino S, Racioppi A, et al: Dysregulation of peripheral endocannabinoid levels in hyperglycemia and obesity: effect of high fat diets. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2008; 286S:S66-S78
- Nogueiras R, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, Woods SC, et al: The endocannabinoid system and the control of glucose homeostasis. J Neuroendocrinol 2008; 20:147—151
- Scheen AJ: CB1 receptor blockade and its impact on cardiometabolic risk factors: overview of the RIO programme with rimonabant. J Neuroendocrinol 2008; 20:139—146
- Engeli S: Dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system in obesity. J Neuroendocrinol 2008; 20:110—115
- Mangieri RA, Piomelli D: Enhancement of endocannabinoid signaling and the pharmacotherapy of depression. Pharmacol Res 2007; 56:360—366
- Drago F: Endocannabinoids and psychopathology: the therapy inside. Pharmacol Res 2007; 56:357—359
- Papathanasopoulos P, Messinis L, Lyros E, et al: Multiple sclerosis, cannabinoids, and cognition. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008; 20:36—50
- Pellegrini-Giampietro DE, Mannaioni G, Bagetta G: Post-ischemic brain damage: the endocannabinoid system in the mechanisms of neuronal death. FEBS J 2009; 276:2—12
- Malfitano AM, Proto MC, Bifulco M: Cannabinoids in the management of spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008; 4:847—853
- Jones D: End of the line for cannabinoid receptor 1 as an anti-obesity target? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008; 7:961—962
Source including Charts, Graphs and Figures: Endocannabinoids: Stress, Anxiety, and Fear
