T
The420Guy
Guest
YOU'D HAVE TO EAT 450 BAGS OF hemp chips within about an hour for THC,
the active ingredient in pot, to even begin registering in your blood.
But try telling that to the Americans. Take the travails of
Chatham-based hemp seed producer Kenex. The company thought it had an
agreement that would allow it to sell its product in the U.S. after it
threatened to sue U.S. Customs for seizing 40,000 pounds of hemp
birdseed that the Americans said showed trace amounts of THC.
But last fall, the DEA issued a surprise "clarification of the rules"
making any consumable trace of THC illegal; everything from hemp
pretzels to salad dressing will be banned as of February 6. Kenex has
joined the Hemp Industry Association and six American hemp companies
in a civil suit against the DEA.
But the company has also decided to go another route in its latest
tiff, this time claiming a breach under Chapter 11 of NAFTA and
seeking more than $20 million in damages.
The very NAFTA regulations used by Ethyl Corp to force the Canadian
government to repeal its ban on the contentious gasoline additive MMT
are now being used by Kenex to defend its environmentally heralded
hemp products.
"Under Chapter 11 of NAFTA, member countries can't treat foreigners
any worse than domestic companies," says Kenex attorney Todd Weiler.
Kenex argues that the ban discriminates against Canadian producers
since most hemp products come to the U.S. from Canada, and Kenex's
competitors, the producers of poppy and flax seed products, don't have
to worry about the ban.
The U.S.'s treatment of Kenex has led the Canadian government to pipe
up on the matter. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAIT)
recently sent a letter to the DEA cautioning that the ban would
violate World Trade Organization rules requiring that risk-assessment
tests be run before products are banned.
Says DFAIT deputy director of trade Andre Lemay, "We don't feel the
ban is legitimate. We say, "Show us the proof.'"
The DEA, which has yet to respond to the government's letter, declined
to comment.
Says Adam Eidinger, of the U.S. hemp advocacy group VoteHemp, "There's
a lot more caffeine in a cup of decaf than there is THC in hemp foods."
Newshawk: puff_tuff
Pubdate: Thu, 31 Jan 2002
Source: NOW Magazine (Canada)
Copyright: 2002 NOW Communications Inc.
Contact: letters@nowtoronto.com
Website: NOW Magazine - NOW Magazine
Details: MapInc
Bookmarks: MapInc (Hemp - Outside U.S.)
the active ingredient in pot, to even begin registering in your blood.
But try telling that to the Americans. Take the travails of
Chatham-based hemp seed producer Kenex. The company thought it had an
agreement that would allow it to sell its product in the U.S. after it
threatened to sue U.S. Customs for seizing 40,000 pounds of hemp
birdseed that the Americans said showed trace amounts of THC.
But last fall, the DEA issued a surprise "clarification of the rules"
making any consumable trace of THC illegal; everything from hemp
pretzels to salad dressing will be banned as of February 6. Kenex has
joined the Hemp Industry Association and six American hemp companies
in a civil suit against the DEA.
But the company has also decided to go another route in its latest
tiff, this time claiming a breach under Chapter 11 of NAFTA and
seeking more than $20 million in damages.
The very NAFTA regulations used by Ethyl Corp to force the Canadian
government to repeal its ban on the contentious gasoline additive MMT
are now being used by Kenex to defend its environmentally heralded
hemp products.
"Under Chapter 11 of NAFTA, member countries can't treat foreigners
any worse than domestic companies," says Kenex attorney Todd Weiler.
Kenex argues that the ban discriminates against Canadian producers
since most hemp products come to the U.S. from Canada, and Kenex's
competitors, the producers of poppy and flax seed products, don't have
to worry about the ban.
The U.S.'s treatment of Kenex has led the Canadian government to pipe
up on the matter. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAIT)
recently sent a letter to the DEA cautioning that the ban would
violate World Trade Organization rules requiring that risk-assessment
tests be run before products are banned.
Says DFAIT deputy director of trade Andre Lemay, "We don't feel the
ban is legitimate. We say, "Show us the proof.'"
The DEA, which has yet to respond to the government's letter, declined
to comment.
Says Adam Eidinger, of the U.S. hemp advocacy group VoteHemp, "There's
a lot more caffeine in a cup of decaf than there is THC in hemp foods."
Newshawk: puff_tuff
Pubdate: Thu, 31 Jan 2002
Source: NOW Magazine (Canada)
Copyright: 2002 NOW Communications Inc.
Contact: letters@nowtoronto.com
Website: NOW Magazine - NOW Magazine
Details: MapInc
Bookmarks: MapInc (Hemp - Outside U.S.)