Robert Celt
New Member
Foundation To Nullify Federal Prohibition In Effect
Two South Dakota Senate bills would legalize medical marijuana in the state, effectively nullifying the unconstitutional federal prohibition of cannabis.
Senate Bill 167 (SB167) was introduced by Sen. Angie O'Donnell (D-Sioux Falls) and two bipartisan co-sponsors, while Senate Bill 171 (SB171) was introduced by the Senate Health and Human Services Committee. These bills would set up a state regulatory regime allowing medical marijuana to make its way into the hands of the sick.
SB167 contains a simple declaration stating that "the compassionate use of medical cannabis is permitted and the use shall be regulated."
SB171 would permit South Dakota residents complying under the regulatory framework set up by the bill to do the following:
(1) Purchase or otherwise acquire cannabis from cultivation facility, or a cannabis product or cannabis from a cannabis product manufacturing facility;
(2) Possess, produce, process, manufacture, compound, convert, prepare, pack, repack, and store cannabis or a cannabis product;
(3) Deliver, transfer, or transport cannabis, a cannabis product, cannabis paraphernalia, or related supplies or educational materials to a dispensary or cannabis product manufacturing facility;
(4) Deliver, transfer, or transport cannabis to a testing facility and compensate a testing facility for services provided; or
(5) Deliver, sell, supply, transfer, or transport cannabis, a cannabis product, cannabis paraphernalia, or related supplies or educational materials to a cannabis product manufacturing facility or dispensary.
Under SB171, patients would qualify to use medical marijuana if they suffered from AIDS, HIV, anorexia, arthritis, endometriosis, cachexia or wasting disease, cancer, glaucoma, hepatitis C, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, Crohn's disease, Alzheimer's disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, continuous muscle spasms, epilepsy or seizures, severe nausea, debilitating pain, post traumatic stress disorder, and the treatment of the aforementioned diseases and conditions. Other conditions may qualify under the discretion of state regulators. Dispensaries would be legalized to distribute medical marijuana under the bill as well.
Despite federal marijuana prohibition, measures such as SB167 and SB171 remain perfectly constitutional, and there is little if anything the feds can do to stop them in practice.
EFFECT ON FEDERAL PROHIBITION
Passage of these bills would partially remove one layer of law prohibiting the possession and use of marijuana in South Dakota, but federal prohibition would remain in place.
Of course, the federal government lacks any constitutional authority to ban or regulate marijuana within the borders of a state, despite the opinion of the politically connected lawyers on the Supreme Court. If you doubt this, ask yourself why it took a constitutional amendment to institute federal alcohol prohibition.
While this South Dakota bills would not alter federal law, they would take a step toward nullifying in effect the federal ban. FBI statistics show that law enforcement makes approximately 99 of 100 marijuana arrests under state, not federal law. By easing the state laws, the South Dakota legislature would remove some of the basis for 99 percent of marijuana arrests.
Furthermore, figures indicate it would take 40 percent of the DEA's yearly-budget just to investigate and raid all of the dispensaries in Los Angeles — a single city in a single state. That does not include the cost of prosecution. The lesson? The feds lack the resources to enforce marijuana prohibition without state assistance.
If the South Dakota legislature passes SB167 or SB171, the Mount Rushmore State would join a growing number of states simply ignoring federal prohibition. Colorado, Washington state and Alaska have all legalized both recreational and medical marijuana, and 23 states now allow cannabis for medical use. With nearly half the country legalizing marijuana, the feds find themselves in a position where they simply can't enforce prohibition any more. The feds need state cooperation to fight the "drug war," and that has rapidly evaporated in the last few years with state legalization, practically nullifying the ban.
"The lesson here is pretty straight forward. When enough people say, 'No!' to the federal government, and enough states pass laws backing those people up, there's not much the feds can do to shove their so-called laws, regulations or mandates down our throats," Tenth Amendment Center founder and executive director Michael Boldin said.
South Dakota SB167 and SB171 would legalize marijuana for medicinal use, setting the foundation to nullify the federal prohibition on the same. The bills must pass in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee to receive votes in the full Senate.
PLEASE TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS to support these important bills.
1. Call the Senate Health and Human Services Committee Chair, Bruce Rampelberg. Strongly, but respectfully urge him to move these important bills forward to a vote in his committee. A phone call has 10x the impact of an email.
Rampelberg: 605-343-9703
2. Call the rest of the committee members. Again, be strong, but respectful. Urge each of them to take action to move the bills forward and vote YES on SB167 and SB171.
Arthur Rusch (R) Vice Chair 605-624-8723
Jim Bradford (D) 605-685-4241
R. Blake Curd (R) 605-331-5890
Troy Heinart (D) 605-856-5045
Phil Jensen (R) 605-343-1335
William Shorma (R) 605-422-3282
3. Call Back — any NO or UNDECIDED — in 3-4 days. Make sure to follow-up. If they say YES, be sure to thank them and, if possible, announce their committed YES vote to email and social media contacts. If they say no, politely ask them why. Get the information from them and contact us.
4. Spread the Word. Share this information widely by facebook, twitter, email and other social networks.
News Moderator: Robert Celt 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: South Dakota Bills Would Legalize Medical Marijuana
Author: Staff
Contact: Tenth Amendment Center (contact form at bottom of page)
Photo Credit: None found
Website: Tenth Amendment Center
Two South Dakota Senate bills would legalize medical marijuana in the state, effectively nullifying the unconstitutional federal prohibition of cannabis.
Senate Bill 167 (SB167) was introduced by Sen. Angie O'Donnell (D-Sioux Falls) and two bipartisan co-sponsors, while Senate Bill 171 (SB171) was introduced by the Senate Health and Human Services Committee. These bills would set up a state regulatory regime allowing medical marijuana to make its way into the hands of the sick.
SB167 contains a simple declaration stating that "the compassionate use of medical cannabis is permitted and the use shall be regulated."
SB171 would permit South Dakota residents complying under the regulatory framework set up by the bill to do the following:
(1) Purchase or otherwise acquire cannabis from cultivation facility, or a cannabis product or cannabis from a cannabis product manufacturing facility;
(2) Possess, produce, process, manufacture, compound, convert, prepare, pack, repack, and store cannabis or a cannabis product;
(3) Deliver, transfer, or transport cannabis, a cannabis product, cannabis paraphernalia, or related supplies or educational materials to a dispensary or cannabis product manufacturing facility;
(4) Deliver, transfer, or transport cannabis to a testing facility and compensate a testing facility for services provided; or
(5) Deliver, sell, supply, transfer, or transport cannabis, a cannabis product, cannabis paraphernalia, or related supplies or educational materials to a cannabis product manufacturing facility or dispensary.
Under SB171, patients would qualify to use medical marijuana if they suffered from AIDS, HIV, anorexia, arthritis, endometriosis, cachexia or wasting disease, cancer, glaucoma, hepatitis C, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, Crohn's disease, Alzheimer's disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, continuous muscle spasms, epilepsy or seizures, severe nausea, debilitating pain, post traumatic stress disorder, and the treatment of the aforementioned diseases and conditions. Other conditions may qualify under the discretion of state regulators. Dispensaries would be legalized to distribute medical marijuana under the bill as well.
Despite federal marijuana prohibition, measures such as SB167 and SB171 remain perfectly constitutional, and there is little if anything the feds can do to stop them in practice.
EFFECT ON FEDERAL PROHIBITION
Passage of these bills would partially remove one layer of law prohibiting the possession and use of marijuana in South Dakota, but federal prohibition would remain in place.
Of course, the federal government lacks any constitutional authority to ban or regulate marijuana within the borders of a state, despite the opinion of the politically connected lawyers on the Supreme Court. If you doubt this, ask yourself why it took a constitutional amendment to institute federal alcohol prohibition.
While this South Dakota bills would not alter federal law, they would take a step toward nullifying in effect the federal ban. FBI statistics show that law enforcement makes approximately 99 of 100 marijuana arrests under state, not federal law. By easing the state laws, the South Dakota legislature would remove some of the basis for 99 percent of marijuana arrests.
Furthermore, figures indicate it would take 40 percent of the DEA's yearly-budget just to investigate and raid all of the dispensaries in Los Angeles — a single city in a single state. That does not include the cost of prosecution. The lesson? The feds lack the resources to enforce marijuana prohibition without state assistance.
If the South Dakota legislature passes SB167 or SB171, the Mount Rushmore State would join a growing number of states simply ignoring federal prohibition. Colorado, Washington state and Alaska have all legalized both recreational and medical marijuana, and 23 states now allow cannabis for medical use. With nearly half the country legalizing marijuana, the feds find themselves in a position where they simply can't enforce prohibition any more. The feds need state cooperation to fight the "drug war," and that has rapidly evaporated in the last few years with state legalization, practically nullifying the ban.
"The lesson here is pretty straight forward. When enough people say, 'No!' to the federal government, and enough states pass laws backing those people up, there's not much the feds can do to shove their so-called laws, regulations or mandates down our throats," Tenth Amendment Center founder and executive director Michael Boldin said.
South Dakota SB167 and SB171 would legalize marijuana for medicinal use, setting the foundation to nullify the federal prohibition on the same. The bills must pass in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee to receive votes in the full Senate.
PLEASE TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS to support these important bills.
1. Call the Senate Health and Human Services Committee Chair, Bruce Rampelberg. Strongly, but respectfully urge him to move these important bills forward to a vote in his committee. A phone call has 10x the impact of an email.
Rampelberg: 605-343-9703
2. Call the rest of the committee members. Again, be strong, but respectful. Urge each of them to take action to move the bills forward and vote YES on SB167 and SB171.
Arthur Rusch (R) Vice Chair 605-624-8723
Jim Bradford (D) 605-685-4241
R. Blake Curd (R) 605-331-5890
Troy Heinart (D) 605-856-5045
Phil Jensen (R) 605-343-1335
William Shorma (R) 605-422-3282
3. Call Back — any NO or UNDECIDED — in 3-4 days. Make sure to follow-up. If they say YES, be sure to thank them and, if possible, announce their committed YES vote to email and social media contacts. If they say no, politely ask them why. Get the information from them and contact us.
4. Spread the Word. Share this information widely by facebook, twitter, email and other social networks.
News Moderator: Robert Celt 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: South Dakota Bills Would Legalize Medical Marijuana
Author: Staff
Contact: Tenth Amendment Center (contact form at bottom of page)
Photo Credit: None found
Website: Tenth Amendment Center
