County Officials looking to Create Guidelines for Medical Marijuana

Weedpipe

420 Member
California - Following in the footsteps of Arcata, other jurisdictions in the county are hoping to create guidelines to regulate medical marijuana distribution through land use codes.

With the increasing attention to medical and recreational marijuana in the state and marijuana production locally, officials with the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors and the Eureka City Council has been meeting with Arcata staff and the Humboldt County District Attorney's office to try and come up with similar guidelines.

Supervisor Mark Lovelace said the legalization of marijuana has been taking center stage recently and drawing away from the issue of regulation. He said jurisdictions don't have authority to say whether access to medical marijuana is being abused, but they can have a discussion about land use and building and zoning.

"I think we get stuck too much on legalization," he said. "That takes off attention that it needs to be regulated."

In Eureka, the City Council will be deciding Tuesday whether to impose a 45-day temporary moratorium on dispensaries, as the participating council members continue to work on the guidelines.

Councilman Jeff Leonard said he hopes the moratorium will discourage any dispensaries that are trying to create establishments before guidelines are created. These guidelines are meant to become something jurisdictions throughout the county can turn to.

Leonard said all those participating agree that there needs to be uniform guidelines.
"We all work on it on our own and we've all arrived at the same conclusion," he said. "The problem is bigger than just within the Eureka city limits."

The council has been trying to address the growing concern over residential grow houses through other law enforcement means, but the issue seems to be taking a toll on resources. Leonard said grow houses are a reoccurring issue for neighborhood community and public safety officials, particularly the fire department.

"In Arcata -- they have probably had more experience than we have -- they put together their original guidelines based on some of their problems," he said.

Arcata adopted its guidelines in November 2008, stating that a medical marijuana cultivation area cannot exceed 50 square feet nor exceed 10 feet in height, per residence, and that the qualified patient must live in the home where the medical marijuana is being grown.

Arcata's ordinance also allows dispensaries to grow medical marijuana, provided the area designated for growing does not exceed 25 percent of the dispensaries' total square feet and is no larger than 1,500 square feet. Plant height is also limited to 10 feet. In addition, a use permit is required to grow medical marijuana within Arcata city limits.

Lovelace, whose district includes Arcata, said the ordinance has been relatively effective.

"It's effective -- it's not a overnight success kind of thing. They certainly have enough of an existing problem that its going to take awhile," he said, adding that effectiveness is limited by law enforcement resources.

Leonard said Arcata's ordinance is a good example of how to handle the issue from a standpoint other than that of law enforcement.

Supervisor Jimmy Smith agrees.

"Arcata stepped up with some building and land use ordinance language that we may be really looking at great detail," he said.

Smith said the county is concerned with a multitude of issues related to the growing of marijuana, including homicides, home invasions, property damage and fire concerns.

While the county can learn from Arcata's guidelines, it will not be able to use them for the entire county since it was created for an urban setting, Lovelace said.

"For the county, we have 3,600 square miles of rural lands," he said. "If we're saying that you can't do this because it's an agricultural use that's not allowed in a residential area, then

what can you do in an agricultural area or rural area?"

Lovelace said this will apply to figuring out if there can be a cap on collectives or cooperatives. Arcata's made its cap at four establishments.

"I'm not sure where we're going to land on that side of the coin," he said.

However legalization or the guidelines play out, Lovelace said, moving forward and working in collaboration is the right direction to go.

"It should not be up to every jurisdiction to create it from scratch," he said.



News Hawk- Weedpipe 420 MAGAZINE ® - Medical Marijuana Publication & Social Networking
Source: ContraCostaTimes.com
Author: Donna Tam
Contact: Home - ContraCostaTimes.com
Copyright: 2009 Bay Area News Group
Website:County officials looking to create guidelines for medical marijuana -
 
Smith said the county is concerned with a multitude of issues related to the growing of marijuana, including homicides, home invasions, property damage and fire concerns.

I believe that the reason there are homicides, home invasions, and property damage is still due to the illegal balckmarket. This stuff is worth more than gold.
 
I believe that the reason there are homicides, home invasions, and property damage is still due to the illegal balckmarket. This stuff is worth more than gold.

I would argue that prohibition provides scum with potentially easy targets. Good people that have nothing to do with drugs or black markets are victims of these crimes as well. Banks get robbed too. Much of the black market is synonymous with legal grow ops and distribution (dubious legislation causes much of this). Ending prohibition would make it less desirable to operate outside of the state and federal laws, and thus ad an element of protection for those often left more exposed to the less then honest citizen.

If you are paying over a thousand bucks for an ounce then you are getting ripped off.

BTW love the user name...my old boss used to call me that
:roorrip:
 
I would argue that prohibition provides scum with potentially easy targets. Good people that have nothing to do with drugs or black markets are victims of these crimes as well. Banks get robbed too. Much of the black market is synonymous with legal grow ops and distribution (dubious legislation causes much of this). Ending prohibition would make it less desirable to operate outside of the state and federal laws, and thus ad an element of protection for those often left more exposed to the less then honest citizen.

If you are paying over a thousand bucks for an ounce then you are getting ripped off.

BTW love the user name...my old boss used to call me that
:roorrip:

GoGreen,
you and I are on the same page brother! The black market has a resounding effect on both legal medical marijuana as well as the illegal side. I also agree with that when it is legalized, the current issues (again both legal & illegal issues) will become much less. Prime example to end prohibition. One more thing. I believe that city officials use a spin on homicide and home invasions as a means to prohibit medical co-ops from entering in their city or county. I want those people that are killing and or robbing legal medical marijuana patients to go to jail and I want city officals to look at acts like these as a way to push for legalization.
 
Smith said the county is concerned with a multitude of issues related to the growing of marijuana, including homicides, home invasions, property damage and fire concerns.

Crime Down In States With Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

There’s a lot of concern from citizens far removed from the medical marijuana movement regarding crime associated with new changes in the law. After over 70 years of misinformation and propaganda it’s no wonder confusion is so rampant.

With the exception of a few dispensaries being robbed, there have been no noticeable increases in crime near dispensaries. The simple fact that dispensaries have existed for such a short period in history also makes it very difficult to associate any increase in crime with dispensaries.

Additionally, sources like CNN have released stories this year about the possibility of an increase in crime in large cities being associated with the economy. How can one differentiate any increase in crime when factors like the economy exist. For this same reason is is impossible to say that dispensaries actually decrease crime either.

The theory that dispensaries cause crime leaves to question all the areas in the country with an increase in crime, but without any medical marijuana dispensaries. Unless a dispensary is directly involved in some sort of criminal activity it is impossible to say if crime increased in any area solely due to the dispensary. If crime were on an upward swing this would all matter, but crime is actually down and mostly so in the region of the United States where dispensaries exist.

Let’s take the FBI’s Preliminary Annual Uniform Crime Report. According to the data, the western area of the United States saw the greatest decrease in murders, and came in second to the mid-west in greatest decrease in violent crimes, aggravated assaults, and larceny.

Given the fact that the majority of the western states (CA, OR, WA, MT, NV, NM, and CO) in the country have legalized medical marijuana, it seems if legalizing medical marijuana causes crime there would be an increase in these crimes, not a decrease. More importantly, this area shouldn’t be the part of the country with the greatest decline if medical marijuana causes crime.

Since California has had legalized medical marijuana the longest, the data for this state was run through the Angela Macdonald number cruncher. Here are the shifts in some of the larger cities in California from 2007 to 2008:

Anaheim
Violent Crime: (-7.8%) Robbery: (-1.38%) Aggravated Assault: (-11.52%)
Property Crime: (-5.31%) Burglary: (-12.21%) Larceny: (-1.09%) Vehicle Theft: (-14.26%)

Bakersfield
Violent Crime: (5.92%) Robbery: (12.56%) Aggravated Assault: (1.57%)
Property Crime: (.64%) Burglary: (17.84%) Larceny: (-3.83%) Vehicle Theft: (-5.7%)

Chula Vista
Violent Crime: (-9.66%) Robbery: (-18.94%) Aggravated Assault: (-2.17%)
Property Crime: (-10.51%) Burglary: (-7.78%) Larceny: (-11.9%) Vehicle Theft: (-9.56%)

Fremont
Violent Crime: (-5.12%) Robbery: (0%) Aggravated Assault: (-8.98%)
Property Crime: (-5.41%) Burglary: (-15.09%) Larceny: (-0.29%) Vehicle Theft: (-9.83%)

Fresno
Violent Crime: (-8.58%) Robbery: (-10.87%) Aggravated Assault: (-6.15%)
Property Crime: (5.18%) Burglary: (7.08%) Larceny: (8.10%) Vehicle Theft: (-6.11%)

Irvine
Violent Crime: (-9.79%) Robbery: (22.73%) Aggravated Assault: (-26.32%)
Property Crime: (-1.38%) Burglary: (-29.04%) Larceny: (6.32%) Vehicle Theft: (-5.58%)

Long Beach
Violent Crime: (-7.82%) Robbery: (-1.26%) Aggravated Assault: (-13.16%)
Property Crime: (0.09%) Burglary: (6.02%) Larceny: (-2.43%) Vehicle Theft: (0.42%)

Los Angeles
Violent Crime: (-4.51%) Robbery: (-0.44%) Aggravated Assault: (-8.73%)
Property Crime: (-0.63%) Burglary: (0.49%) Larceny: (0.29%) Vehicle Theft: (-3.83%)

Modesto
Violent Crime: (-3.42%) Robbery: (-5.09%) Aggravated Assault: (-3.64%)
Property Crime: (-9.61%) Burglary: (7.99%) Larceny: (-10.65%) Vehicle Theft: (-25.31%)

Oakland
Violent Crime: (3.94%) Robbery: (-4.24%) Aggravated Assault: (11.11%)
Property Crime: (-9.2%) Burglary: (-5.36%) Larceny: (-0.44%) Vehicle Theft: (-18.89%)

Riverside
Violent Crime: (1.53%) Robbery: (5.83%) Aggravated Assault: (-3.26%)
Property Crime: (-0.85%) Burglary: (-0.85%) Larceny: (2.1%) Vehicle Theft: (-12.19%)

Sacramento
Violent Crime: (-9.13%) Robbery: (-12.34%) Aggravated Assault: (-6.91%)
Property Crime: (-7.79%) Burglary: (-3.8%) Larceny: (-4.12%) Vehicle Theft: (-19.15%)

San Bernardino
Violent Crime: (-3.53%) Robbery: (-9.63%) Aggravated Assault: (2.48%)
Property Crime: (-6.46%) Burglary: (4.04%) Larceny: (-5.32%) Vehicle Theft: (-17.4%)

San Diego
Violent Crime: (-4.5%) Robbery: (-3.63%) Aggravated Assault: (-7.34%)
Property Crime: (-8.61%) Burglary: (0.83%) Larceny: (-5.67%) Vehicle Theft: (-19.26%)

San Jose
Violent Crime: (-3.09%) Robbery: (5.24%) Aggravated Assault: (-7.09%)
Property Crime: (-7.33%) Burglary: (-22.30%) Larceny: (3.12%) Vehicle Theft: (-18.46%)

Santa Ana
Violent Crime: (-11.35%) Robbery: (8.09%) Aggravated Assault: (-27.04%)
Property Crime: (-10.48%) Burglary: (8.29%) Larceny: (-7.17%) Vehicle Theft: (-26.9%)

Stockton
Violent Crime: (2.51%) Robbery: (-3.53%) Aggravated Assault: (6.53%)
Property Crime: (-3.87%) Burglary: (7.38%) Larceny: (-5.78%) Vehicle Theft: (-11.97%)

With the exception of the occasional dispensary robbery, there is no evidence to show an increase in crime with direct connection to medical marijuana dispensaries. Even with these robberies in mind, it stands to question why any place is robbed.

After analyzing the numbers, it seems strange that anyone would try to say medical marijuana causes any crime. If anything, the data shows quite the opposite.

Logic determines that when a crime is no longer a crime there will be less criminals. What does it say when the primary reason produced by most of the counties, cities, and towns to support banning dispensaries is completely unfounded? What will the next excuse be?


News Hawk: User: 420 MAGAZINE ® - Medical Marijuana Publication & Social Networking
Source: Examiner.com
Author: Angela Macdonald
Copyright: 2009 Clarity Digital Group LLC d/b/a Examiner.com
Contact: Contact Us
Website: Crime down in states with medical marijuana dispensaries
 
Back
Top Bottom