Judge Throws Out Drug Charges After 'Bad Faith' RCMP

Jim Finnel

Fallen Cannabis Warrior & Ex News Moderator
BC: A wacky tip about someone tied up in a house wasn't good enough reason for police to search a property without a warrant, a B.C. Supreme Court judge has ruled.

The federal Crown stayed marijuana charges against Karen Brunskil and Steven Leahy after Justice John Truscott said police violated their rights when they searched their property April 26, 2009.

The RCMP were investigating an anonymous second-hand report, received by phone, suggesting someone was tied up at a house. Two officers arrived at Leahy and Brunskill's home, located in a rural area near 100 Mile House, and said they needed to look around.

The couple allowed the police to look inside their house, but balked when police said they wanted to search the outbuildings as well. Growing marijuana was found inside three locked sheds behind the house. Officers forced their way inside the sheds.

Justice Truscott said the officers had no objective reason to think anything amiss was afoot. The initial anonymous call to the RCMP was bizarre and contained little rational information suggesting someone was in danger.

The couple's behaviour at the head of their driveway after police arrived was not unusual. They had no criminal records and police had no information to suggest the house was producing drugs.

"In my view, when the two constables went to the address and spoke to the accused at the front gate and were told that there was no one tied up at that residence, they should have accepted that and left," Justice Truscott said.

"I recognize that from the police perspective it is always considered risky to ignore a complaint, but there must be some common sense exercised before intruding on a person's home.

"It is actually quite alarming that the police should have considered that they had the right to carry out a warrantless search on the basis of such a telephone call. I consider, in all the circumstances, the police acted in bad faith in carrying out this search when it was clearly an unreasonable suspicion," the judge said.

The trial was held in January. Truscott's written decision in the case was publicly released Wednesday.


NewsHawk: User: 420 Magazine - Cannabis Culture News & Reviews
Source: Kamloops Daily News (CN BC)
Copyright: 2010 Kamloops Daily News
Contact: kamloopsnews@telus.net
Website: Kamloops News, Events & Classifieds | Kamloops Daily News
Author: Robert Koopmans
 
Yes!!!:bravo: One for our side.
 
It would have been a legal search in the US. Police are allowed to enter the premisses without a search warrant if they have reason to believe someone has been injured.
 
The police in any uniform, are trying to hold on to a way of life that was easy and free for them to get cannabis, money and "Stuff" by stealing it from someone. Often it is done at gunpoint. It is known to be a common problem because the laws make it so easy. The police take your stuff and you get forced into signing away your rights and then they just split up the booty (like pirates).

You are not going to argue with a group of people with guns who could just shoot you for no reason and say you tried to escape. Terrorists is the name for those bad, corrrupt cops out there. I think they get off on the abuse they cause. Those types of cops are both sick and criminal.
 
Here in the US the repercussions of a police society is beginning to show. More and more cops are being shot because people are just frustrated and fed up. Cops just need to grow up and see that drug laws are worthless and worse than that they are unconstitutional. The officers should be owing there allegiance to the constitution of this great nation, not to self serving politicians.
 
Back
Top Bottom