Medical Marijuana Fight Returns to Airwaves, Computers

Christine Green

New Member
Tallahassee – The medical marijuana amendment is back, and the fight over the issue is poised to return to the airwaves and screens of all sizes throughout Florida.

Drug Free Florida, the group that successfully fended off a similar amendment in 2014, released its first video this week attacking the new measure that will go before voters on the November ballot. The three-minute video is running online only, but it signals the start of a campaign likely to inundate the state with ads.

The video compares the ballot measure with California's experience, which it portrays as having a glut of pot shops and users who have at best a weak link to any medical malady.

"It really isn't something that looks like a pharmacy; it's really something recreational, and it's not really going to people in need," said Christina Johnson, spokeswoman for No on 2, Drug Free Florida's campaign.

Drug Free Florida's political committee raised $6.4 million to defeat the similar initiative in 2014, with the vast majority of that coming from casino magnate Sheldon Adelson and the family trust of Carol Jenkins Barnett, CEO of Publix.

But it has raised little since, according to the latest state campaign finance report. Johnson said that will change soon, though.

"Right now we're in the initial stages of putting things together, and I know the finance committee is going to go out there raising money and I think that'll dictate what our general election strategy will be," Johnson said.

By contrast, the political committee for United for Care, the group supporting the amendment, has raised and spent $3.6 million since the 2014 election, although most of that money went to paid petition gatherers to get the measure on the ballot again.

Orlando trial lawyer John Morgan, a Democratic fundraiser, is backing the push again this time. His firm has contributed $2.7 million since June 2015 to the campaign.

The 2014 measure received 58 percent of the vote, but constitutional amendments need 60 percent to pass in Florida.

The 2016 amendment would allow doctors to prescribe marijuana to patients with a "debilitating" disease or condition, such as cancer, epilepsy, glaucoma, HIV/AIDS, post-traumatic stress disorder, ALS, Crohn's disease, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis.

The previous ballot measure defined eligible diseases more loosely. Supporters say the new amendment tightens up the concerns over loopholes that opponents say would allow for de facto legalization.

In addition to the stricter definition, it mandates more state oversight, including requiring parents to give written consent to the state to allow their children to be prescribed marijuana.

"The opposition says 'medical marijuana is for anything, it's for a hangnail.' Well, no it's only for debilitating medical conditions," said United for Care director Ben Pollara.

No matter the outcome this time, though, controversy over the issue will linger. Marijuana is still classified by the federal government as a Schedule I drug, with its sale and use banned.

Public health departments and the criminal justice system will have to deal with a shift in attitudes toward the drug.

The Florida Department of Health already is struggling with licensing nurseries to grow and sell non-euphoric strands of marijuana for epileptic patients, two years after the Legislature passed a law allowing them to do so.

Law enforcement officials will have to grapple with differing punishments for marijuana possession as different cities take up softer penalties.

Daytona Beach became the latest city to do so on Thursday, passing an ordinance allowing officers to hand out tickets to those caught with less than 20 grams of marijuana. Orlando passed a similar measure last week, but many nearby municipalities have not.

mj-veg.jpg


News Moderator: Christine Green 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Medical marijuana fight returns to airwaves, computers - Orlando Sentinel
Author: Gray Rohrer
Contact: (407) 420-5000
Website: Orlando News, Weather & Sports - Orlando Sentinel
 
The video compares the ballot measure with California's experience, which it portrays as having a glut of pot shops and users who have at best a weak link to any medical malady.

While I certainly wouldn't want to be the person that had to argue that the latter does not have at least some tiny hint of reality about it, about the former... Is there a glut on the market? Are lots of dispensaries in California going out of business because they couldn't move enough product? Are they having to dump massive amounts of it into incinerators because they cannot sell it? Are they having to sell it for $50/ounce there?

"It really isn't something that looks like a pharmacy

And why should it be? Thanks to the federal government having illegally (it fails to meet even ONE of the three requirements for Schedule I classification) classified it as a Schedule I narcotic and continuing to keep it there, doctors cannot legally prescribe cannabis in any state and, therefore, it has no place being in a pharmacy. Thus... cannabis-specific dispensaries. You can't have it both ways, people - that's like denying funding to your local fire department and then bitching when you call 911 after your house catches on fire and the person at the other end suggest that you get some sticks and place marshmallows and hot dogs onto them.

Drug Free Florida's political committee raised $6.4 million to defeat the similar initiative in 2014, with the vast majority of that coming from casino magnate Sheldon Adelson and the family trust of Carol Jenkins Barnett, CEO of Publix.

The number of people who have been scientifically proven to be addicted to cannabis is so small as to be laughable. OtOH, an estimated 1,242,299 United States citizens have a gambling addiction. Therefore, it seems somewhat wrong to use the profits of an actual addiction to finance the prohibition of a supposed one. Then again, most casinos serve alcohol and the number of US citizens over the age of twelve who are addicted to alcohol... is a number which is roughly equal to the population of the entire state of Texas.

I can respect people who favor the prohibition of cannabis, even for medicinal purposes, that actually believe that to do otherwise would be harmful. I do not agree with them - science, the overwhelming majority of the medical profession, history, and plain old fashioned common sense clearly shows otherwise - but I can respect them. However, those who are in favor of the prohibition of cannabis simply because it helps preserve their own chosen "racket" deserve no one's respect!

But it has raised little since, according to the latest state campaign finance report. Johnson said that will change soon, though.

Because stating "we don't expect to get a whole lot of funding in the future" turns out to not be a wise fundraising move, lol?

"Right now we're in the initial stages of putting things together, and I know the finance committee is going to go out there raising money and I think that'll dictate what our general election strategy will be," Johnson said.

Oh please, Lord, save us from committees (especially political ones!).

Orlando trial lawyer John Morgan, a Democratic fundraiser, is backing the push again this time. His firm has contributed $2.7 million since June 2015 to the campaign.

John Morgan... I have a picture of him somewhere. Here you go:
John_Morgan_1.jpg


As a matter of fact, I have another one, lol:
John_Morgan_2.jpg


That second photo was taken after he was arrested for battery on a police officer (to whit, headbutting him twice, punching him in the face and, err, calling him "baldy" and a "fat f*cker" :laughtwo:). It turns out that he did this... because the cop was trying to arrest him for driving drunk, failing to provide insurance, and two traffic violations :rofl: .

It is my opinion that some people ought to just smoke a bowl and chill the f*ck out. Ohwaitaminute, that's illegal in the state of Florida (but so is driving while sh!tfaced, lol, and then attacking the guy that decides to arrest you for it :scratchinghead: - that's what happens when harmful addictive substances are legal, but helpful non-addictive ones... are not).

BtW, that was his second arrest for DUI. His first occurred four years earlier when he was involved in a two-car accident, which he claimed was due to him being distracted by talking on his cell phone instead of being inebriated well above the legal limit. He was able to plead that one down to reckless driving because the United States legal system is, after all... the country's biggest good old boy network.

I wonder if any of that was part of the dinner conversation when the Morgans hosted the Obamas for a fundraising dinner during the Obama reelection campaign, lofl?

Morgan is one of Crist's political bedfellows. You know, the Republican-turned-Independent-turned-Democrat, Charlie Crist. The guy who (somehow?) got elected as governor of Florida as a Republican, then decided to run for Senate but was so obviously set to lose against Marco Rubio in the primary that he dropped out and ran in the general election as an Independent. He lost, so he figured why not try his luck as a Democrat, lol, and just a couple years later he (amazingly) was unchallenged for the Democratic nomination for governor (just a few years after being the state's Republican governor, in case you've become hopelessly lost ;) ). He then went on to lose the election against governor Rick Scott, which says a lot, since Scott was widely proclaimed to be one of the most vulnerable incumbants in the entire country that November (as in, I think I heard it said that Scott would probably lose the election even if his opponent was a DEAD guy, lol - but he managed to beat Crist).

In fact, Crist was (possibly still is?) at one time running the Tampa branch of Morgan's law firm.

I guess if y'all have to have opponents to the legalization movement down there in Florida... You got pretty lucky by getting Morgan as one of them, LMFAO.

Really, it makes sense for a trial lawyer to oppose the legalization of cannabis, since cannabis defendants are in many ways considered to be "easy wins."

Ironically, when 6,000 federal inmates got sprung in the largest ever one-time release during one weekend in 2015 due to prison overcrowding... a lot of them returned to Florida. Among them were some people who were convicted of "crimes" having to do with cannabis, true - but a lot were cocaine smugglers or methamphetimine makers. Apparently our prisons are so overcrowded that they don't even want people who have been convicted of drugs-related offenses (even when the drugs are those that have been found to be far more harmful than cannabis) - yet people like Morgan, who should be well aware of this fact since he in the legal profession... are fighting FOR prohibition.

Does any of this make sense to anyone?

Maybe it's time for John Morgan... to put the bottle down. And to just say no.
 
Back
Top Bottom