SirBlazinBowl
New Member
San Pablo could become the latest East Bay city to punt and more than once on the issue of medical marijuana. Tonight the City Council is expected to vote on an emergency ordinance that would extend for a second year a moratorium on medical marijuana dispensaries, popularly known as cannabis clubs. The point of the moratorium, according to the text of the ordinance,
is to protect the public from possible adverse effects of cannabis
clubs locally while the conflict on medical marijuana between the
state and the federal government plays out. In a report to the council, City Attorney Brian Libow also raises the specter that the City Council could be accused of aiding and abetting a federal crime if it permits medical marijuana dispensaries. In 1996, California voters approved the medical use of marijuana on the recommendation of a doctor. The federal government, however, classifies marijuana as an illegal drug with no medical use.
About 50 California cities have moratoriums on the openings of
cannabis clubs. Twenty-four cities and three counties have
ordinances to regulate them and about 15 cities have bans, according
to Libow's report. Albany and Pinole extended their moratoriums for a second year in April; Oakley did so in March. Concord banned medical marijuana dispensaries last year and has been sued in a state court by Americans For Safe Access, a patient-advocacy group. Many cities are watching that case as well as another suit by the same group against the city of Fresno. But
Albany City Attorney Robert Zweben said in April, "We won't see an
appellate court decision for probably a year or more" in those cases.
Cities with no reference to cannabis clubs in their zoning
ordinances lack a legal mechanism to stop them from opening unless
they enact moratoriums. Even then, dispensaries that already exist
remain, at least for the time being. It is to avoid such a scenario
that San Pablo enacted its initial 45-day moratorium in May 2005 and
a subsequent 101/2-month extension that expires May 15. San Pablo has received one inquiry from someone seeking to open a cannabis club and can expect to receive more, Libow said in his report. Among possible adverse effects of cannabis clubs he cited were loitering, parking and traffic violations, increased vehicular and pedestrian traffic, complaints from neighbors and crimes such as burglary. Libow said state Attorney General Bill Lockyer is considering issuing a legal opinion whether government employees in the state violate the federal law when they issue medical marijuana ID cards, or similarly if a police officer returns marijuana to someone who shows such an ID card or if a judge orders the return of marijuana to a patient.
The same question could be applied to a city council that passes a
medical marijuana regulating ordinance, Libow argued. A 2005 U.S. Supreme Court cases affirmed the federal government's right to prosecute people who use medical marijuana even in states that permit the use.
Newshawk: SirBlazinBowl - 420 Magazine
Source: Contra Costa Times (CA)
Copyright: 2006 Knight Ridder
Contact: letters@cctimes.com
Website:ContraCostaTimes.com : Contra Costa & Alameda News, Sports, Jobs, Cars and Real Estate
Author: Tom Lochner
is to protect the public from possible adverse effects of cannabis
clubs locally while the conflict on medical marijuana between the
state and the federal government plays out. In a report to the council, City Attorney Brian Libow also raises the specter that the City Council could be accused of aiding and abetting a federal crime if it permits medical marijuana dispensaries. In 1996, California voters approved the medical use of marijuana on the recommendation of a doctor. The federal government, however, classifies marijuana as an illegal drug with no medical use.
About 50 California cities have moratoriums on the openings of
cannabis clubs. Twenty-four cities and three counties have
ordinances to regulate them and about 15 cities have bans, according
to Libow's report. Albany and Pinole extended their moratoriums for a second year in April; Oakley did so in March. Concord banned medical marijuana dispensaries last year and has been sued in a state court by Americans For Safe Access, a patient-advocacy group. Many cities are watching that case as well as another suit by the same group against the city of Fresno. But
Albany City Attorney Robert Zweben said in April, "We won't see an
appellate court decision for probably a year or more" in those cases.
Cities with no reference to cannabis clubs in their zoning
ordinances lack a legal mechanism to stop them from opening unless
they enact moratoriums. Even then, dispensaries that already exist
remain, at least for the time being. It is to avoid such a scenario
that San Pablo enacted its initial 45-day moratorium in May 2005 and
a subsequent 101/2-month extension that expires May 15. San Pablo has received one inquiry from someone seeking to open a cannabis club and can expect to receive more, Libow said in his report. Among possible adverse effects of cannabis clubs he cited were loitering, parking and traffic violations, increased vehicular and pedestrian traffic, complaints from neighbors and crimes such as burglary. Libow said state Attorney General Bill Lockyer is considering issuing a legal opinion whether government employees in the state violate the federal law when they issue medical marijuana ID cards, or similarly if a police officer returns marijuana to someone who shows such an ID card or if a judge orders the return of marijuana to a patient.
The same question could be applied to a city council that passes a
medical marijuana regulating ordinance, Libow argued. A 2005 U.S. Supreme Court cases affirmed the federal government's right to prosecute people who use medical marijuana even in states that permit the use.
Newshawk: SirBlazinBowl - 420 Magazine
Source: Contra Costa Times (CA)
Copyright: 2006 Knight Ridder
Contact: letters@cctimes.com
Website:ContraCostaTimes.com : Contra Costa & Alameda News, Sports, Jobs, Cars and Real Estate
Author: Tom Lochner
