Physiologic Observations in a Controlled Clinical Trial of the Antiemetic

Jacob Bell

New Member
Physiologic observations in a controlled clinical trial of the antiemetic effectiveness of 5, 10, and 15 mg of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in cancer chemotherapy. Ophthalmologic implications


Author(s) Levitt M, Wilson A, Bowman D, Kemel S, Krepart G, Marks V, Schipper H, Thomson G, Weinerman B, Weinerman R
Journal, Volume, Issue J Clin Pharmacol 1981;21(8-9 Suppl):103S-109S
Major outcome(s) Patients were remarkably free of adverse physiologic effects.
Indication Cancer chemotherapy;Glaucoma
Medication Delta-9-THC
Participants 120
Design Controlled study
Type of publication Medical journal


Abstract

One hundred twenty patients about to receive their first treatment with potentially nauseant cancer chemotherapy were randomized to one of si xantiemetic treatments: (1) no treatment; (2) placebo; (3) prochlorperazine (PCPZ), 10 mg; (4) delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 5 mg; (5) THC, 10 mg; (6) THC, 15 mg. Four doses of each medication were given orally at 4-hour intervals starting 2 hours before chemotherapy. A study nurse was responsible for both objective (nurse) and subjective (patient) symptom questionnaires. Serum levels were obtained at intervals for cross-reacting cannabinoids. Physiologic measurements including intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, and pulmonary function were also recorded. In summary, the patients were remarkably free of adverse physiologic effects. All intraocular pressures before and after treatment were within the normal range, although a surprising statistically significant increase in IOP occurred in the group receiving 5 mg THC.


Source: Physiologic observations in a controlled clinical trial of the antiemetic effectiveness of 5, 10, and 15 mg of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in cancer chemotherapy. Ophthalmologic implications
 
Back
Top Bottom