T
The420Guy
Guest
Well, it's April 20th once again. Protesters are gathering at the Capitol
and Hemp Week at Oklahoma State is drawing to a close.
I remember when I first heard about the yearly "4-20" lobbying. I said, "Do
they really think Oklahoma is going to consider marijuana legalization
legislation?" After considerable thought and research this year, I've come
to the realization that they have a good point, and the demonstration at the
Capitol is at least a step in the right direction, even if it doesn't get
results in the foreseeable future.
What kind of research might have lead me to this line of thought? No, not
first-hand experimentation. I read articles on the issue. I read a lot of
them. Today, I'm just going to tell you some important findings so that
maybe you'll better understand what the fuss is about rather than thinking
of it as selfish pot-head nonsense.
First of all, how did marijuana become illegal in the first place? I'm glad
that you asked. See, it all started around the 1920s. The jazz scene became
an avenue for the popularization of smoking marijuana.
As America became more aware of this sensation, it became associated with
minorities. Racism was much more popular in those days and people liked to
look for a reason to keep it strong. Marijuana became one of these reasons.
Blacks and Hispanics were often pointed out as adding to the degradation of
society. If people then associated "devil's weed" with these groups, it
could add to their justification. Marijuana use was soon equated with
violent crime and moral corruption, all in the name of good old-fashioned
racism. Some sources say that other factors such as hemp's exceptional value
in the textile and paper industries also came into play around this same
time. Competition with big industry plus racist propaganda equals
prohibition in this case. Congress passed the "Marihuana Tax of 1937" which,
in effect, made the sale and use of the substance highly finable.
Now here we are today with police running around enforcing the rather
unsubstantiated illegalization of the narcotic. Well, that's understandable,
but it adds to a bigger problem. A lot of these arrests lead to prison time,
but prison time means prison space and taxpayer money.
The U.S. prison population today is more than 2 million, a greater combined
population than Alaska, North Dakota and South Dakota. With a cost of around
$25,000 per year per inmate in a federal prison, that's a lot of taxpayer
money.
That's OK, though, because we're getting murderers and rapists out of
circulation, right? During Clinton's term, marijuana arrests saw a 60
percent increase. And while we allocate all this money to take care of the
ridiculously high inmate population, other publicly funded institutions
(such as schools) see meager funding increases.
So which is more beneficial to society -- legalizing marijuana and gearing
prison funding more toward violent criminals or keeping these drug offenders
locked up while school funding continues to squeak by?
Perhaps the idea of legalizing a "drug" offends you. I did a lot of research
into side effects as well. Marijuana most likely leads to the same types of
lung problems as cigarettes. That's pretty much it. It could lead to
behavioral changes, but mostly in the area of motivation, not violence.
Studies have shown that a drunken driver is much more of a threat to public
safety than a "high" driver, but alcohol is legal. If the prohibition is
dropped, will society go down the tubes? Will the United States turn into a
bunch of pot-heads and exhaust our food resources? Actually, not much would
change, except that we'd have less people in prison and less drug dealers.
I've only touched on a few of the many reasons why the current legal status
of marijuana should be reversed. Sadly, an opinion column is not long enough
to paint the full picture. In fact, I can only present about one-hundredth
the amount of information I dug up in researching this issue and that's just
what I printed out.
It may seem like a radical idea, but its not just because some hippies don't
want to get arrested. New Mexico's governor Gary Johnson and even Dan Quayle
have presented this same view. It makes a lot of sense in terms of the
overall benefits to society.
I ask you to open your minds to this, if only for today. Forego today's nap
and get on the Internet. Look at some of the different sides of this issue
for an hour.
Supporting legalization does not mean you support smoking. You can support
the legal status of cigarettes and still think it's a horrible habit. You
may say, "Even if I love this idea, it won't make a single difference."
Every person counts, just look at what happened to the last presidential
election. Sign an online petition at a site like NORML or even a paper
petition with OSU's "Students for Sensible Drug Policy" organization.
Whether you take a stand or just see where someone else is standing, you'll
at least have learned something. Open your minds this Friday and have a
happy April 20.
Erik Dunham is a Chemical Engineering Senior from Ponca City.
Newshawk: Cannabis News - marijuana, hemp, and cannabis news
Pubdate: Fri, 20 Apr 2001
Source: Daily O'Collegian (OK)
Copyright: 2001 Oklahoma State University
Contact: letters@ocolly.com
Website: ocolly.com | The O'Colly, at Oklahoma State University since 1895
Details: MapInc
Author: Erik Dunham
and Hemp Week at Oklahoma State is drawing to a close.
I remember when I first heard about the yearly "4-20" lobbying. I said, "Do
they really think Oklahoma is going to consider marijuana legalization
legislation?" After considerable thought and research this year, I've come
to the realization that they have a good point, and the demonstration at the
Capitol is at least a step in the right direction, even if it doesn't get
results in the foreseeable future.
What kind of research might have lead me to this line of thought? No, not
first-hand experimentation. I read articles on the issue. I read a lot of
them. Today, I'm just going to tell you some important findings so that
maybe you'll better understand what the fuss is about rather than thinking
of it as selfish pot-head nonsense.
First of all, how did marijuana become illegal in the first place? I'm glad
that you asked. See, it all started around the 1920s. The jazz scene became
an avenue for the popularization of smoking marijuana.
As America became more aware of this sensation, it became associated with
minorities. Racism was much more popular in those days and people liked to
look for a reason to keep it strong. Marijuana became one of these reasons.
Blacks and Hispanics were often pointed out as adding to the degradation of
society. If people then associated "devil's weed" with these groups, it
could add to their justification. Marijuana use was soon equated with
violent crime and moral corruption, all in the name of good old-fashioned
racism. Some sources say that other factors such as hemp's exceptional value
in the textile and paper industries also came into play around this same
time. Competition with big industry plus racist propaganda equals
prohibition in this case. Congress passed the "Marihuana Tax of 1937" which,
in effect, made the sale and use of the substance highly finable.
Now here we are today with police running around enforcing the rather
unsubstantiated illegalization of the narcotic. Well, that's understandable,
but it adds to a bigger problem. A lot of these arrests lead to prison time,
but prison time means prison space and taxpayer money.
The U.S. prison population today is more than 2 million, a greater combined
population than Alaska, North Dakota and South Dakota. With a cost of around
$25,000 per year per inmate in a federal prison, that's a lot of taxpayer
money.
That's OK, though, because we're getting murderers and rapists out of
circulation, right? During Clinton's term, marijuana arrests saw a 60
percent increase. And while we allocate all this money to take care of the
ridiculously high inmate population, other publicly funded institutions
(such as schools) see meager funding increases.
So which is more beneficial to society -- legalizing marijuana and gearing
prison funding more toward violent criminals or keeping these drug offenders
locked up while school funding continues to squeak by?
Perhaps the idea of legalizing a "drug" offends you. I did a lot of research
into side effects as well. Marijuana most likely leads to the same types of
lung problems as cigarettes. That's pretty much it. It could lead to
behavioral changes, but mostly in the area of motivation, not violence.
Studies have shown that a drunken driver is much more of a threat to public
safety than a "high" driver, but alcohol is legal. If the prohibition is
dropped, will society go down the tubes? Will the United States turn into a
bunch of pot-heads and exhaust our food resources? Actually, not much would
change, except that we'd have less people in prison and less drug dealers.
I've only touched on a few of the many reasons why the current legal status
of marijuana should be reversed. Sadly, an opinion column is not long enough
to paint the full picture. In fact, I can only present about one-hundredth
the amount of information I dug up in researching this issue and that's just
what I printed out.
It may seem like a radical idea, but its not just because some hippies don't
want to get arrested. New Mexico's governor Gary Johnson and even Dan Quayle
have presented this same view. It makes a lot of sense in terms of the
overall benefits to society.
I ask you to open your minds to this, if only for today. Forego today's nap
and get on the Internet. Look at some of the different sides of this issue
for an hour.
Supporting legalization does not mean you support smoking. You can support
the legal status of cigarettes and still think it's a horrible habit. You
may say, "Even if I love this idea, it won't make a single difference."
Every person counts, just look at what happened to the last presidential
election. Sign an online petition at a site like NORML or even a paper
petition with OSU's "Students for Sensible Drug Policy" organization.
Whether you take a stand or just see where someone else is standing, you'll
at least have learned something. Open your minds this Friday and have a
happy April 20.
Erik Dunham is a Chemical Engineering Senior from Ponca City.
Newshawk: Cannabis News - marijuana, hemp, and cannabis news
Pubdate: Fri, 20 Apr 2001
Source: Daily O'Collegian (OK)
Copyright: 2001 Oklahoma State University
Contact: letters@ocolly.com
Website: ocolly.com | The O'Colly, at Oklahoma State University since 1895
Details: MapInc
Author: Erik Dunham
