D.C. Mayor At Risk Of Watching Her Marijuana Policy Go Up In Smoke

Robert Celt

New Member
D.C. Council member Charles Allen had just voted his conscience Tuesday. It didn't matter anymore, he thought, if pot clubs formed in the nation's capital. The freshman lawmaker decided at the council meeting that nearly a year after the city legalized marijuana, there was good reason to give D.C. residents discreet places to smoke away from home, where it wouldn't happen around kids.

Then his cellphone vibrated on the council dais. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) was on the line, and she pleaded with him to change his vote, he said. "She said in very clear terms that the city and the police department were not ready for this," Allen said.

So Allen (D-Ward 6), like another council member Tuesday, reversed his vote and agreed to reconsider the issue within four weeks. That still leaves open the question of how the council will resolve a major disagreement about how lenient the city should be in regulating the smoking of pot in public.

Bowser a year ago surprised the city in her first weeks in office with a forceful showdown with Congress over legalizing pot. The new mayor had not campaigned on the issue, but she seized on it and made it her own. Bowser vowed to enact the will of seven in 10 voters who had supported a pro-pot initiative, and she did so over threats of jail time from House Republicans, winning standing ovations all over the city.

But less than a year later, a messy and public scramble on Tuesday by the mayor to keep intact – perhaps just for 90 days – a package of restrictions against public pot smoking showed something else. Bowser is no longer in full control of the issue, and, in fact, risks slipping behind fast-shifting public sentiment in favor of greater acceptance of legalization in Washington.

Bowser has promised not to let pot smoking become an embarrassment in the nation's capital, even making deals with pot advocates to keep clouds of marijuana smoke from rising over the Mall in her first year in office. She also has grand ambitions, after years of corruption scandals hanging over the District's city hall, of making the mayor's office a greater force on Capitol Hill.

At the same time, she has vowed to use marijuana policy as a vehicle to press for D.C. residents' voting rights with federal overseers, and recent polls show that even more residents – 74 percent – think Congress should back off and allow the city to regulate and tax the sale of marijuana than support legalization itself, 69 percent.

On Tuesday, however, when Bowser called both friend and foe on the council, close aides in the room with her and lawmakers who picked up her calls said her driving motivation appeared to be more immediate. Whether by fault of her own or the council – and Bowser most definitely blamed the council – she warned that the city was poised to leap into an abyss of pot deregulation that it might never pull out of, she repeatedly warned lawmakers.

"We did not want the current law to go up in smoke without a clear sense of what would happen when it did," said Bowser's chief of staff John Falcicchio. "If we're going to have a conversation about what the future of legalization looks like, let's have that conversation, but that shouldn't happen by just allowing what we have in place to expire."

D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier said the police department remains poised to enforce whatever decision the council and mayor decide on pot clubs, but she added that legalization and assorted extensions of that legislation ought to have continued oversight by residents.

"We have dealt with whatever the legislation has been put into law. The role of the police department is to enforce the law on the books. We're going to enforce those laws," Lanier said. "There needs to be some very careful vetting by what is passed by the community. This is something that needs to have more discussion."

Congress last year handcuffed the District into a tortured state of partial pot legalization. It couldn't stop the city from declaring pot legal based on the ballot measure, or from letting residents grow it or share it. But it barred the District from spending any local tax revenue to write or enforce regulations to govern the sale and taxation of the drug. Several conservative Republicans in the House said they feared Colorado-style marijuana dispensaries popping up in sight of the White House or even adjacent to the FBI.

Still, ambiguity in the local ballot law that was enacted by Bowser and the council could have allowed European-style pot clubs to form in the city in which residents and visitors could pay membership for access to places to smoke, legal experts said. And the ballot measure was silent about whether clubs, music venues or even religious institutions could allow smoking on their properties.

To prevent their formation, Bowser sent legislation to the council on Day 1 of legalization last February prohibiting marijuana consumption at virtually any registered business. A single violation, the mayor warned, would lead to a business losing its ability to operate. The result has been a lack of gathering places for pot smokers. Also, a gray market has sprung up in the city, daring entrepreneurs to accept "donations" to various causes in exchange for gifts of pot or even engage in straight up bartering for the plant. D.C. police have made only one arrest – of a pair that blanketed luxury vehicles with pictures of pot and parked on major city thoroughfares taking donations for pot-laced brownies and other edibles. Many more low-key operations continue.

Council member David Grosso (I-At large) said he sees an unwillingness by Bowser and leaders of the council to confront Congress more aggressively on the issue. "Where's the outrage?" he said of the status quo. He and council member Brianne K. Nadeau (D-Ward 1) are advocating for the most aggressive and controversial option available to the mayor and council. They want the city to exploit a loophole in federal budget law to let the city fully regulate the sale of marijuana. That would call for using surplus money from past budget years that is not explicitly appropriated by Congress to pay for writing and enforcing new marijuana regulations.

Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D), however, said he is inclined to go along with continuing Bowser's proposed ban on pot clubs. "I haven't heard any complaints" about the way things are going, he said.

The council has four weeks to work out a compromise, before a vote to extend Bowser's ban or let it expire this spring. Falcicchio, her chief of staff, said the city would not be in the quandary if Council member Kenyan R. McDuffie (D-Ward 5) had taken up the issue earlier last year as head of the judiciary committee.

Council member LaRuby May (D-Ward 8), who is a close ally of Bowser's and who is up for reelection this spring, initially opposed a ban on pot clubs but then reversed course on Tuesday amid lobbying by the mayor. She remains a possible swing vote on the issue next month. May did not return phone calls and a text Wednesday seeking comment.

Cannabis22.jpg


News Moderator: Robert Celt 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: D.C. Mayor At Risk Of Watching Her Marijuana Policy Go Up In Smoke
Author: Aaron C. Davis
Photo Credit: Justin Sullivan
Website: The Washington Post
 
The B.S. may very well continue in D.C. City, but they are FAR, FAR ahead of just about everyone else in this Nation. How many states and cities are at the point where D.C. is, whereby they're just trying to figure out how "public" open consumption should be. Hell, they've already tackled the largest of all hurdles through the proper and appropriate used of a BALLOT INITIATIVE. This is the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

Congratulations, D.C. ! You are so far AHEAD of the curve on this issue that the vast majority of us are sitting here scratching our confused heads. How can this happen ? Our Nation's capitol (on non-federal property) can legally obtain, consume, convey and even CULTIVATE their own cannabis legally. The PEOPLE in our NATION'S CAPITOL were "allowed" to speak through their VOTES. WHAT A NOVEL IDEA to actually PRACTICE ! And, of course, this means that our elected politicians can go to the city for their governmental activities in "representing" their constituents, then head home or to the home of a colleague and spark up a few joints, all while the majority of Americans have to practice their private use ILLEGALLY.

Maaaaaan, what a joke this is.

But once again, CONGRATULATIONS to the residents (and visitors !) in our NATION'S CAPITOL. Enjoy your freedom of choice while the rest of us can only fantasize about it. Sad, very sad.

WE NEED THE FREEDOM TO VOTE. Ballot initiatives are the ONLY way to allow the MAJORITY TO BE HEARD.

Anyone care to comment ?

Signed,
(Literally) handcuffed in New York State
 
The B.S. may very well continue in D.C. City, but they are FAR, FAR ahead of just about everyone else in this Nation. How many states and cities are at the point where D.C. is, whereby they're just trying to figure out how "public" open consumption should be. Hell, they've already tackled the largest of all hurdles through the proper and appropriate used of a BALLOT INITIATIVE. This is the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

Congratulations, D.C. ! You are so far AHEAD of the curve on this issue that the vast majority of us are sitting here scratching our confused heads. How can this happen ? Our Nation's capitol (on non-federal property) can legally obtain, consume, convey and even CULTIVATE their own cannabis legally. The PEOPLE in our NATION'S CAPITOL were "allowed" to speak through their VOTES. WHAT A NOVEL IDEA to actually PRACTICE ! And, of course, this means that our elected politicians can go to the city for their governmental activities in "representing" their constituents, then head home or to the home of a colleague and spark up a few joints, all while the majority of Americans have to practice their private use ILLEGALLY.

Maaaaaan, what a joke this is.

But once again, CONGRATULATIONS to the residents (and visitors !) in our NATION'S CAPITOL. Enjoy your freedom of choice while the rest of us can only fantasize about it. Sad, very sad.

WE NEED THE FREEDOM TO VOTE. Ballot initiatives are the ONLY way to allow the MAJORITY TO BE HEARD.

Anyone care to comment ?

Signed,
(Literally) handcuffed in New York State
Good comment. I agree with you. I live in Colorado. The place where marijuana has a rep for being so free and easy. That's baloney too, if you don't happen to live in the Denver area, or along the front range ....

My little town, and county in the middle of nowhere on the eastern plains, bans the sale of marijuana. It is not just because of the law makers. It was put to the vote here last November, and was voted down... There are still a majority of people that have been brainwashed, by the anti-drug propaganda over the past 80 years, who need educated.
 
angrc, you fell prey to the folk not being educated, as you say. They ARE brainwashed and it will take some doing to "debrief" them so that they can at least ask questions, and maybe even seek answers. Once they have the answers / accurate information / data in front of them, a good chunk of them will see through a different set of eyes --- a set of eyes based on finding the truth and not relying on your elected officials to tell you the truth. On this issue, the open eyes see it and the ayes have it (the majority). There will be "pockets" whereby the majority is speaking with their vote and it's not what the Nation is thinking and doing as a whole.

But ---- at least the PEOPLE were given the choice ---- and if that would happen everywhere, we will have made the next positive stepo-change for society. From there, it's a matter of smoothing out, polishing, and systemically setting up a legal system that supports the legal activities being practiced. For the most part, everyone just wants to be able to go on with their lives and have cannabis be a part of that quality of life that everyone seeks.

Peace.
 
angrc, you fell prey to the folk not being educated, as you say. They ARE brainwashed and it will take some doing to "debrief" them so that they can at least ask questions, and maybe even seek answers. Once they have the answers / accurate information / data in front of them, a good chunk of them will see through a different set of eyes --- a set of eyes based on finding the truth and not relying on your elected officials to tell you the truth. On this issue, the open eyes see it and the ayes have it (the majority). There will be "pockets" whereby the majority is speaking with their vote and it's not what the Nation is thinking and doing as a whole.

But ---- at least the PEOPLE were given the choice ---- and if that would happen everywhere, we will have made the next positive stepo-change for society. From there, it's a matter of smoothing out, polishing, and systemically setting up a legal system that supports the legal activities being practiced. For the most part, everyone just wants to be able to go on with their lives and have cannabis be a part of that quality of life that everyone seeks.

Peace.
Well, I'm 67, and took my first hit in 1969, at age 19, in Vietnam. Since then I have enjoyed MJ immensely, and have smoked it all over the planet. Only in the past three years, except for a few trips to Amsterdam, have I been able to smoke for recreation and not fear arrest. There are a lot of people on both sides of the law who do not want it to be legal ... Took me about three years to even educate my wife. Even so, it took her watching me not become a raving drug addict, but just being pleasantly high and more fun to be around, to convince her that she was wrong about weed. So, I suppose if I can turn her, then there is hope, but we have much work!:Namaste:
 
Guys, come down here to the "third least likely state to legalize Cannabis" and see just how bad y'all DON'T have it in ANY legal state. There is much work to be done indeed my friends, a shit load of work!!!

Good job D.C., I'm sure you guys will hammer out the minuscule little details sooner or later? Meanwhile some of us will just keep living in fear for our very lives on a daily basis, all the while just dreaming of a day we can legally sit in our own houses and use Cannabis however we choose. Civil liberty is a pipe dream for some people I guess?
 
Back
Top Bottom