Why 2016 Will Be Marijuana's Most Important Year Ever

The General

New Member
The 2014 midterm elections will go down in history as one of the most important years in marijuana history. It provided validation that two trailblazer states – Washington and Colorado – had made the right decision two years prior in pushing through a voter-passed ballot initiative, allowing for the possession and consumption of adults. Many were skeptical when those states passed their respective laws, but in 2014, they suddenly don't look so crazy.

Following this year's election cycle, two more states – Oregon and Alaska – and the nation's capital, Washington D.C., now have legalized marijuana for themselves. While it wasn't completely unexpected, it is still a bit jarring for many people to comprehend. Ten years ago, or even five years ago, having any state, let alone four plus Washington D.C., with legal marijuana was inconceivable. But it appears public perception has gone through a massive flip in a relative short amount of time, and now states will be rolling in new tax revenues, will likely see their crime rates drop, and also save in terms of law enforcement costs. It's a very exciting time for cannabis activists. But 2014 will be nothing compared to 2016.

What makes 2016 so special? Well, it will be the third election cycle in which marijuana legalization measures will be on ballots across the country. While 2014 led some more credence to the legalization movement, it is still largely considered an "experiment" by many, seeing as how these laws still conflict with federal law, and that the feds themselves have really yet to choose one side or the other. With legalization hitting the nation's capital, and three of the four states making up the Pacific coast, the feds will likely need to weigh in within the next several months.

There are a handful of states that are looking at getting measures on the 2016 ballot, and if even a few of them are able to successfully get the votes to put them into law, suddenly marijuana legalization is no longer simply an experiment. Leading the way headed into 2016 is the nation's most populous state, California. Efforts are underway, and have been for sometime, to finally get cannabis into a position of full-legality, and 2016 looks like it will be the first time it has actually been on the ballot, and up for voters to decide on. According to San Diego-based news outlet KUSI, the Marijuana Policy Project – which ran the campaign during 2012 in Colorado – is already on the ground conjuring up support.

Polling conducted in California prior to this year's midterms show that Californians already support marijuana legalization by a fairly wide margin. Tulchin Research's work show that 65% of California residents support a measure to legalize, regulate and tax cannabis. Over the next two years, as Oregon, Alaska and D.C. all rack up tax revenues and their residents go about their lives without fear of arrest for possession, that margin could easily widen. In fact, the state's Democratic party has already added it to their platform for the next election cycle.

In addition to California, it looks as though Massachusetts, Arizona and Nevada could also be gearing up to legalize in 2016. Now, if all three of those states opt to do so (Arizona would be the only questionable one), that would bring the total up to eight states – not counting D.C. – which is 16% of the country. That may be enough to actually tip the scales and lead to a cascade of victories in other states in 2020 and 2022. Once voters in other states realize that the sky does not fall upon legalization, they'll probably be more inclined to vote in support.

Another reason to think 2016 may be even better than 2014? More voters will show up, being a presidential election year, and it looks as though they're likely to vote more progressive. "Voter turnout tends to be much higher in presidential election years," Mason Tvert, communications director of the Marijuana Policy Project, told The Huffington Post. "We believe a 2016 initiative will best demonstrate just how much support there is for ending marijuana prohibition in California."

California – the nation's most populous state, and eighth largest economy in the world, all on its own – is the biggest domino that needs to fall, and it looks like 2016 is the year that it will happen. If the entire west coast, and a few other states legalize along the way, it's hard to imagine the trend reversing itself, or the feds pulling the plug on the whole thing. So if you think 2014 was a big deal for the legalization effort, buckle up. 2016 is due to provide some real fireworks.

Buds_in_Hand.jpg


News Moderator - The General @ 420 MAGAZINE ®
Source: Wallstcheatsheet.com
Author: Sam Becker
Contact: Wallstcheatsheet.com
Website: Why 2016 Will be Marijuana?s Most Important Year Ever
 
1996 was the most important year for marijuana period. California had the uh, avocados to be first. Other states began to fall like the disintegration of the old (as opposed to Putin's new) Soviet Union. This is a boulder rolling downhill because of Prop 215.

Thank you Californians for the weed, movies, Silicon Valley, music and porn!

And avocados.
 
Good read thank you!
 
I just hope whoever writes the proposition to legalize in 2016 doesn't include rights for cities and counties to ban it. As it is in places like where I live,qualified medical cannabis patients who are on fixed incomes and/or don't have the means to travel long distances do not have legal and safe access to their meds. Sure,you can find weed on the local recreational black market but that's like if you have a headache and go to the store and all the labels and other identifying marks removed. What good will an anti diarrhea drug do for your headache? And how do u know there isn't any toxic chemicals,etc. in it? We can still have and use it so prop 215 helps but the safe access part is the equivalent to being outlawed. Other than some protection from local and state law enforcement,prop 215 doesn't benefit us. In the Fresno county ordinance to ban all cannabis cultivation,the board of supervisors acknowledge that chemicals and molds can be dangerous for some patients yet they provide no means to safe access. This shows me it is their intent to ignore the purpose of prop 215 and also with their excessive fines,penalties and ways to rob us shows we are just another source of revenue. The wording in the prop in 2016 needs 2 avoid all that crap.
 
FLORIDA WAS THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW MEDICAL Marijuana, BY A JUDGEMENT SETTLEMENT( its public record and little known fact). CALIFORNIA WAS THE FIRST STATE TO PASS A BILL INTO LAW.
 
But alas, Florida just shot itself in the foot, 58% to 42%, which is less than the 60% required. And in Florida, they only allow the Charlotte's Web variety of cannabis. Will have to keep patient a while longer but I agree that the next election cycle is going to see some major changes. Can't happen quick enough for me.
 
To my great shame I skipped the election that legalized medical cannabis in my home state. I first heard that the measure failed by a few votes, at which point I felt like a dipshit. Then a final vote had the measure passing and I praised Jesus...ever since Cannabis has saved and changed my life. So now, I put money into Americans for Safe Access because there are people still oppressed in places in America and they need to be freed.

Yeah, I'm never skipping another election.
 
Governor Chris Christie (who spent over 300000$ of tax payers money on deserts and such) has made the statement, if he should decide to run for president...and win, he would start to enforce federal laws against mj. He feels mj use is a sickness or words to that effect. My concern is a conservative president in 2016 can and may do the same, no matter who. From what I've heard from the candidates Christie is the only person making such statements, however the others may just be keeping their feelings about mj quiet then if elected lower the boom on mmj. Does anyone have any thoughts on the next election and mj? I know Bernie sanders would be good on the mj issue but his chances are slim to none to be elected. What can we do to to prevent this if an anti mj person is elected?
 
Bush was president during California's green rush, but the biggest crackdowns came from local federal prosecutors during the Obama administration. Christie sucks but has little chance to win.

Primary rhetoric can largely be ignored, except from Christie.

The only thing we can do is fight for legalization with votes and DOLLARS. I'm a dues paying member of Americans for Safe Access. That's where one can put her money where her mouth is.
 
Back
Top Bottom