CA: Cannabis Concentrates Have A Problem With Pesticides

Katelyn Baker

Well-Known Member
Weed vapes have a pesticide problem. Think you're vaping pure cannabis oil? Think again. Some oils and concentrates that get tested have turned out to be contaminated with toxic chemicals.

"This is really nasty stuff," says Adam Lustig, CEO and founder of Higher Vision Cannabis, which specializes in a signature oil. "The amount of damage to someone's health you can do with pesticides is huge." Some cannabis farmers in California spray their plants with chemicals like avermectin (used in Avid insecticide), myclobutanil (used in Eagle 20 pesticide) and bifenazate (used in Floramite). Exposure to these chemicals has been proven toxic or even carcinogenic, resulting in symptoms including vomiting, rash, nosebleed, tremors and coma.

There are no statewide regulations limiting the pesticides cultivators use on their crop. Only in the city of Berkeley do concentrates have to meet a stringent standard for the amount of pesticide, in parts per billion, that's allowed to show up in testing.

Some of the pesticides pot farmers spray aren't even approved for use on food, says Lustig, illustrating how dangerous they could be on other ingested crops like cannabis. "It's like the dirty secret of the industry is finally coming out," he says.

In some cases, up to 80 percent of concentrates that get tested show signs of pesticides, according to SC Labs. On cannabis flowers, pesticide detection rates range between 5 and 15 percent, according to Alec Dixon, SC Labs co-founder. "When we start talking about these extracts, anything that was there in tiny amounts substantially concentrates and becomes present," he says. "In certain types of extracts, we see anywhere from 25 to 30 percent detection rate, but if you're talking about higher-tech extract with CO2, butane and distillation, we see 50 to 75 percent."

Whether they grow indoors, outdoors or in a greenhouse, cannabis farmers have to combat invasive pest species, spider mites, plant pathogens, fungi, powdery mildew and other threats to their crop. "A lot of people that are really well-intentioned spray these pesticides," Dixon says. "[The pesticides] have a residual life on the plant, and it all comes out in the concentrates." Even if the pesticides won't show up on the plant itself, by the time harvest comes around they'll come back in the concentrate process, during which trace amounts are magnified.

Moreover, Dixon adds, it's not clear whether cannabinoid and pesticide chemicals concentrate at analogous rates. Cannabinoids like THC might concentrate at five to seven times what's in the original plant material, but the pesticides might concentrate at 100 times the original level.

The presence of pesticide traces alone won't mean that a concentrate fails the pesticide test, however. "By failing, we need to make sure we understand what that means," says Dave Eagerton, vice president of technical services at CW Analytical, another cannabis testing lab. "In our context, that means anything above 100 parts per billion, and that's according to the standard set by the city of Berkeley. But there's no real agreement in regard to the appropriate limit."

Berkeley's standard for what dispensaries can sell is much more strict than state regulations in places such as Oregon or Colorado, which all have defined various limits for pesticides. "They can be anywhere from 100 parts per billion to 2,000 parts per billion, depending on which compound you're talking about," Eagerton says.

"The fact that we don't have regulations in place means that people can produce and sell without having to test out of a dispensary," says Reggie Gaudino, vice president of scientific operations and director of intellectual property at Steep Hill Labs. "In a regulated market, the product flows from cultivator to testing lab, and if it passes, it goes to the dispensary. That's how the flow should go, but it doesn't right now in California." Currently, lawmakers are working out regulations for the adult use and medical markets that should be in place by 2018.

Nonetheless, there are alternatives to pesticides that farmers can start to experiment with, if they haven't already. Garlic oil, cinnamon oil and natural terpenes (aromatic molecules) that act as antimicrobials and antifungals are among a number of natural alternatives, Gaudino suggests. Some farmers have turned to fungi pesticides, which attract the insects who die upon eating the mushroom.

"Right now it's like the Wild West – you consume at your own risk," says Doug Hitman, owner and founder of Chalice Festival, Happy Place Festival and Hitman Glass. "If my grandmother was sick and knowing that marijuana is a medicine, after seeing the [pesticide] test, I wouldn't give that to someone I love." In the most recent competition at Happy Place Fest, a cannabis festival in Victorville, 80 percent of the cartridges failed pesticide testing, Hitman says. "The real problem is the nonregulation of this. There's more hazardous stuff out there than not. And out of all those people who failed, none of them were conscious of it being unhealthy."

WikimediaCommons11.jpg


News Moderator: Katelyn Baker 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Cannabis Concentrates Have A Problem With Pesticides
Author: Madison Margolin
Contact: LA Weekly
Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Website: LA Weekly
 
Growing at 4.100 foot elevation in the desert may be the solution. I have grown outdoors in these conditions for over six years. I do not use pesticides, mold or mildew inhibitors for the simple reason that I do not have to.
The pests that plague growers in more humid areas just do not exist in my growing environment.
I grow under real sun, in real soil, with only organic fertilizers, and have NEVER had to use pesticides or herbicides.
 
This is a known issue in the essential oil industry, as this article points out the chemicals of the pesticides which were diluted in the prep of use and dispersion on the crop is re-concentrated during the the plants own condintration process (infact, there is only one company that I know of that has taken significant steps to avoid using chemicalpesticides as well as taking the additional step of using "Virgin Land" that has never been used for growing to avoid contaminating their crops they use for essential oil production with old chemical fertilizers.

The issue is that currently we have been in something of a pot gold rush of sorts with the lop sided approach to the plants legalization and as a result growers are using conventual wisdom on a unconventual plant to take advantage of this gold rush rather than doing the full research on what happens when you make oils from plants that have been treated with chemicals. . Sadly I don't see this changing for quite some time as the company I mentioned above I'd constantly having to battle the FDA and their pharmaceutical industry backers from harassing them, so until that battle is finally put to bed, I don't see it trickling down into mainstream growing operations but staying in the perverbal/litterally closet with cannabis . In short, the old adage " it's better to make it yourself because you know what's going into it " Will continue to hold true ( and given the Trump administrations BS, this may mean that if you want to be healthy and continue to use cannabis, you're probably going to have to break the law to live...)
 
Thanks....I truly believe in home grown, knowing how and what is used to grow. The policies are in place for big pharma and corporations. Guess I'll have to be an outlaw!!!!
 
A lot of this should change in 2018 when all licensed businesses in CA are only able to do business with other license holders. Also cultivators will have to use a licensed distributor who will have to take the product for full testing before it is given the ok and passed on to the dispensaries, manufactures or extraction companies. Along with seed to sale tracking and very stiff penalties for improper record keeping and tracking this should reduce the polluted products on the market greatly.

Also prior to Oct 2016 it was actually highly illegal to make concentrates in California, so most of these manufactures had to have clandestine operations, using non lab grade conditions. As of October 2016 a bill was passed which I was part of (AB2679) which legalized extraction by licensed and approved providers which will allow for the people who professionally want to do extractions the ability to do so without fear of very harsh penalties... this does require the facility to be designed to ASME standards and get local fire marshal approval prior to getting licensed, however it also puts additional regulation on the facilities to make sure they are operating under safe conditions.

It may take a while for all this to actually change and be enforced, but the system moving forward is designed to allow for only product which has been rigorously tested to hit market.

I don't dab or use any extracts for the same reason though, and even started to grow my own because of these profit driven psudo farmers using crap like Eagle 20. Better to grow your own.
 
Well I am glad to hear that there is regulation been put in place in California regarding the refinement of cannabis oil, I don't believe it is going to be even fully implemented simply because the nature of most humans is to put the dollar above quality. I believe that there are going to be a lot of greased hands that will make quality questionable almost indefinitely or will mark the price up so much it will be that more difficult to get it as medicine without some sort of co-pay.
 
Back
Top Bottom