The Growing Potential Of Energy-Efficient Pot Farms

Robert Celt

New Member
Cannabis production is among the most energy-intensive industries in the U.S. But some experts, growers, utility companies and local government agencies in states where marijuana is legal point the way toward reducing pot production's energy consumption and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions.

In Colorado, where marijuana was legalized in a 2012 referendum and became available for sale through licensed growers in 2014, new official data on the industry's energy use signals the challenges ahead.

One study found that Colorado growing operations in 2014 used energy equivalent to that consumed by 35,000 households.

Legal marijuana production is still new, however, and some have begun to take action to reduce its energy use.

"The industry as a whole has gotten a bad rap for not being energy efficient, but we are definitely working to minimize our carbon footprint," said Stephen Lipton, general cultivation manager at The Farm, a grower and recreational marijuana dispensary in Boulder, Colorado. "Right now, it's still a work in progress."

A key challenge is that most commercial growing operations in Colorado are located indoors to create conditions conducive to reaping a maximum possible number of high-quality marijuana plants.

"Growing indoors is pretty energy inefficient, but in most places in the U.S. you can only get one or two seasons outdoors, so there's really not much of a choice," said David DeGraff, chief executive officer of The Grow School in Denver.

Indoor operations often use 1000-watt, high-intensity bulbs – which generate a lot of unwanted heat that then has to be removed from the indoor environment with air conditioners and ventilation systems.

In some cases, energy bills might represent 30 percent of the total cost of an operation, Lipton said.

Many marijuana growers in Colorado produce pot at their homes rather than in large operations. But home growers are also concerned about reducing energy to lower their electricity bills, experts said.

In addition to being expensive, the high level of energy use in marijuana production may become unsustainable as the world seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to avoid the worst effects of climate change.

There is movement for greater efficiency.

"There are technologies and strategies for reducing electricity use in lighting, ventilation and dehumidification – you can cut energy use by 50 percent or more with state-of-the-art technology," said Howard Geller, executive director of the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, a nonprofit policy and advocacy group based in Boulder, Colorado.

"A number of grow houses have adopted these technologies," Geller said.

Boulder County's government has stepped in. It mandated that licensed cannabis growers use 100 percent renewable energy to power their facilities starting in 2015, said Ron Flax, the county's sustainability examiner for land use.

Most growers were unable to meet that requirement because of the "tremendous" amount of energy they use, insufficient roof space for solar arrays, and financial structures and lease arrangements that make investing in such infrastructure unattractive, Flax said.

So the county created what it calls an energy-impact offset fund, he said.

Cannabis growers pay into the fund if they are unable to use renewable energy in their operations. Also as part of the program, each operation is to receive an energy-monitoring device to allow them and the county to assess their energy use in real time.

Much of the money in the fund goes to educating growers about how to use less energy.

Growers in Boulder can also take advantage of a rebate program by utility company Xcel Energy that rewards businesses for improving energy efficiency.

"It could be [installing new] lighting or insulation – the same thing any building would do to improve efficiency," Xcel spokesman Gabriel Romero said, adding that the program is not specific to the cannabis industry, but available to any similarly energy-intensive business.

At The Farm, owner Lipton said he works with both Xcel and an energy consultant to reduce his operation's carbon footprint. The Farm has installed new lights, ventilation and air conditioning systems, and other technology to increase efficiency.

"It works both ways, it's beneficial to us as well to reduce our energy levels and it also benefits the environment," Lipton said.

Some growers are hesitant to change lighting and other equipment out of fear it will hurt their product, said Geller of the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project.

"They're making a lot of money now," Gellar said. "Therefore they're concerned and reluctant to change."

Energy efficiency improvements such as installing LED lighting can lead to both savings and increased yields of the cannabis crop, according to a 2014 report by Northwest Power and Conservation Council, which coordinates the electricity needs of four states –Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana.

And, Flax said he expects energy efficiency to improve as the commercial marijuana-growing industry matures.

In addition to the use of more efficient lighting and technology, Flax said he expects a gradual shift to outdoor cultivation and sophisticated greenhouse designs instead of indoor operations with artificial lighting.

Some cautioned that greenhouses also consume energy through their use of ventilation systems and supplemental lighting. During the winter, greenhouse cannabis operations would need five to six hours a day of supplemental lighting so that the plants don't think it's fall and begin flowering, DeGraff of The Grow School said.

But all the experts agreed that new technologies are currently being developed – including brighter LED lighting – that can make the industry more energy efficient and climate friendly.

"The industry hasn't come to full fruition yet," Flax said. "To some extent the industry hasn't known how much energy its consuming ... by installing energy-monitoring devices they have a tool to see in real time how much power they're consuming – an important first step for anyone wanting to improve."

LED_lighting.jpg


News Moderator: Robert Celt 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: The Growing Potential Of Energy-Efficient Pot Farms
Author: Renee Lewis
Contact: Aljazeera America
Photo Credit: None found
Website: Aljazeera America
 
Like I said in another article, I don't understand why they haven't been using LED's for these large commercial grows way before now. Paying less for the energy to run LED lights and for the ventilation of heat will soon out weigh the up front cost of the more expensive LED lights, not to mention that LED's last way longer than HID lights, so there's less cost of replacement bulbs as well.

Even most all trucking companies figured this out years ago that if you spend a little more to run LED lights, you'll wind up spending allot less in the long run because they last way longer and burn way less energy than conventional lights. I don't even think you can buy a new semi trailer that's not equipped with LED lights anymore.

Go green and nip this problem in the bud with LED's legal states, don't give them yet another reason to bitch guys.
 
I agree with the article to a point. As growers, heck as human beings it is our responsibility to use our resources as wisely as we can. But that being said, I noticed they only talk about how much energy pot growers are using. I live near and have worked inside of Intels Ronal's Acres facility and can tell you right now, one building alone, D1X at Intels campus consumes more energy then every pot grower commercial and noncommercial in every legal state we have right now. You can literally walk for over a thousand feet and pass 800 amp panels one after the other packed as closely as legally possible and that is only one direction. The place is huge. Granted they do have solar arrays covering one parking lot perhaps a block square but that does not even scratch what they consume for lighting let alone the rest. This campus is so large they have their own substation. And they are not alone, there are other businesses that consume huge blocks of energy.

I agree we as growers need to do our part but when they single us out like we are the culprits, and leave out big business as if they consume nothing worth mentioning, that really irritates me.
 
I agree with the article to a point. As growers, heck as human beings it is our responsibility to use our resources as wisely as we can. But that being said, I noticed they only talk about how much energy pot growers are using. I live near and have worked inside of Intels Ronal's Acres facility and can tell you right now, one building alone, D1X at Intels campus consumes more energy then every pot grower commercial and noncommercial in every legal state we have right now. You can literally walk for over a thousand feet and pass 800 amp panels one after the other packed as closely as legally possible and that is only one direction. The place is huge. Granted they do have solar arrays covering one parking lot perhaps a block square but that does not even scratch what they consume for lighting let alone the rest. This campus is so large they have their own substation. And they are not alone, there are other businesses that consume huge blocks of energy.

I agree we as growers need to do our part but when they single us out like we are the culprits, and leave out big business as if they consume nothing worth mentioning, that really irritates me.

So true brother...Hell, I'll bet a little league baseball or football field consumes more energy than a large grow operation does? Or at least as much, with all those lights going at once?

Maybe all those casinos in Vegas and elsewhere should be over taxed for their massive energy usage as well?

This singling out of Cannabis growers is just more bitching and complaining because of it's stigma and really has nothing to do with energy usage. They are just looking for ANY excuse they can find to give Cannabis a black eye and leave a bad taste in people's mouths and is just another desperate attempt to gain back control over the people through fear tactics and deception, nothing more!
 
Like I said in another article, I don't understand why they haven't been using LED's for these large commercial grows way before now. Paying less for the energy to run LED lights and for the ventilation of heat will soon out weigh the up front cost of the more expensive LED lights, not to mention that LED's last way longer than HID lights, so there's less cost of replacement bulbs as well.

Even most all trucking companies figured this out years ago that if you spend a little more to run LED lights, you'll wind up spending allot less in the long run because they last way longer and burn way less energy than conventional lights. I don't even think you can buy a new semi trailer that's not equipped with LED lights anymore.

Go green and nip this problem in the bud with LED's legal states, don't give them yet another reason to bitch guys.

I agree mostly, but you know, a year and a half ago the payback on LED lights was over one year.

Personally, I have not yet seen a good early veg with LED, (though it should be theoretically possible,) so CFL (especially high output T5) still has a place.
 
I agree mostly, but you know, a year and a half ago the payback on LED lights was over one year.

Personally, I have not yet seen a good early veg with LED, (though it should be theoretically possible,) so CFL (especially high output T5) still has a place.

Ok, veg with T5's then switch over to LED for flowering, whatever, they need not be using all HID's for these huge grow operations IMO.

I can see 1 or 2 HID's for a personal small home grow but when your talking about a whole warehouse full of 1000w HPS and 800w MH lights going all the time, that's really cost inefficient if you ask me and there has to be a better way?
 
Ok, veg with T5's then switch over to LED for flowering, whatever, they need not be using all HID's for these huge grow operations IMO.

I can see 1 or 2 HID's for a personal small home grow but when your talking about a whole warehouse full of 1000w HPS and 800w MH lights going all the time, that's really cost inefficient if you ask me and there has to be a better way?

They should be using SUNLIGHT for these huge grow ops - supplemented with LEDs as needed - reduced with retractable sun shades as needed. You can't beat sunlight, it's frikin' huge !
 
Back
Top Bottom