Three Biggest Reasons Tobacco Giants Eye Lucrative $50 Billion Marijuana Market

Robert Celt

New Member
Big tobacco conglomerates are positioning themselves to muscle into the growing marijuana business if the drug wins nationwide legal status, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.

Cigarette smoking has been declining for years, so the tobacco giants see at least three huge ways they can benefit from legal marijuana:

New Market: Marijuana represents a vast untapped new market for tobacco firms. There are an estimated 4-6 million regular users now but Marijuana's Marlboro Man hasn't yet been introduced — that is, a well-defined brand that attracts loyal, repeat customers.

Redeem Smoking: Millions of regular marijuana buyers extend their high by smoking the drug. That means legalized marijuana may help reduce the current stigma on regular cigarettes.

Big Profits: Tobacco giants are buying up the top vape makers. Big profits are there for the taking from e-cigarettes because they can be used for both marijuana and nicotine.

Four states and the District of Columbia have already approved some level of legalization for possession of small amounts of marijuana, and 10 other states may have ballot measures in 2016 that give voters further opportunities to legalize possession.

Big tobacco, despite its conservative image since the 1970s, has been closely eyeing the marijuana market which venture capitalists regard to be worth $50 billion in annual revenues.

Tobacco companies are now on a buying spree of e-cigarette companies which produce vaporizers, a smoking device marijuana users prefer because it can offer a higher high.

In 1970, Philip Morris covertly sought government research funds from the Department of Justice (DOJ), then overseen by Attorney General John N. Mitchell, a close friend and ally of President Richard Nixon. The funds were to be used to study the drug, according to documents obtained under litigation by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

After approaching DOJ's Bureau of Narcotics and Drug Abuse with a secret offer to conduct marijuana research, Philip Morris received formal bureau approval, although the company insisted it be done on a "confidential basis" to avoid public awareness.

"We can hardly refuse this request under any circumstances," stated an unsigned 1970 Philip Morris memo to executives obtained by UCSF's Center for Tobacco Research & Education.

"We are in the business of relaxing people who are tense and providing a pick up for people who are bored or depressed," the tobacco memo added. "The human needs that our product fills will not go away. Thus, the only real threat to our business is that society will find other means of satisfying these needs."

Philip Morris, now known as Altria, was so enthusiastic over the prospects of cashing in on marijuana that in 1993 it sought the French trademark and intellectual property rights for the name "Marley," named after Jamaican celebrity Bob Marley, an avid and well-known advocate for the drug.

Reynolds America's Jacob McConnico told TheDCNF there are no marijuana plans underway at his tobacco company. "None of Reynolds American's operating companies is evaluating entering the U.S. market with commercial brands of marijuana," he said.

Altria did not respond to TheDCNF's request for comment.

"I would deny it, too," replied Keith Humphreys, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford School of Medicine. "If that were my intention, I would deny it at this moment," he told TheDCNF.

Humphreys is a giant in the drug abuse and reform movement. He sat on California's highly publicized "blue ribbon" marijuana policy commission as a steering committee member that was headed by California's pro-legalization Democratic Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom. Humphreys was also a senior advisor to Obama at the White House Office of Drug Control Policy.

Humphreys said big tobacco has a distinct advantage in marijuana production. "On marijuana, who knows better how to grow a plant that you dry up, wrap up in paper and smoke," he told TheDCNF. "They're the masters of that worldwide and have wide brand recognition."

Jonathan Caulkins, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz Center and co-director of RAND's Drug Policy Center, told TheDCNF he believes the tobacco industry is privately looking at the legalization movement.

"If you're specifically in the tobacco industry, of course you should be paying great attention," Caulkins said. "It would be unfair to your shareholders if you didn't at least watch with interest and probably should have several analysts working full time trying to think of different scenarios of how this could play out."

Dr. Stanton Glantz of the UCSF School of Medicine and the American Legacy Foundation Distinguished Professor of Tobacco Control told TheDCNF, "They certainly would deny it if you asked them, but the reality is that tobacco firms are very well positioned."

"They know how to make the product very well and very efficiently," Glantz said. "More important, they know how to engineer the product to maximize the addictive potential, which is something that the current marijuana enterprises probably aren't as good at."

Glantz, who was also a key figure in the litigation effort that released 80 million pages of internal tobacco industry documents, said "it would be a very, very very small step for them to dive into the marijuana with both feet if they wanted to."

The documents show big tobacco has toyed with marijuana cigarettes for at least half of a century.

"Since at least 1970, despite fervent denials, three multinational tobacco companies, Phillip Morris (PM), British American Tobacco (BAT, including its US subsidiary Brown & Williamson [B&W]), and RJ Reynolds (RJR), all have considered manufacturing cigarettes containing cannabis," the UCSF researchers concluded.

Glantz asserted tobacco companies "have the financial resources, product design technology to optimize puff-by-puff delivery of a psychoactive drug (nicotine), marketing muscle, and political clout to transform the marijuana market."

As noted previously, big tobacco is buying up American e-cigarette companies with fervor.

In the last three years, Altria Group acquired e-cigarette company Green Smoke for $110 million and Lorillard acquired Blu Ecigs for $135 million and Reynolds America launched its own e-cigarette vaporizing brand, called Vuse.

Last April, Japan American Tobacco agreed to acquire Logic Technology Development, LLC, the third largest e-cigarette company offered in American convenience stores.

"For e-cigarettes, there is a huge crossover in e-cigarette use between marijuana and tobacco," Glantz told TheDCNF.

A 2003 University of Florida study found that two out of three marijuana users follow the drug with mentholated cigarettes, which can extend the high.

Caulkins said he believes "it will be quite possible in the marijuana legalization market, we might move away from combustion-related products and moving heavily into 'vaping' based products."

marijuana-cigarettes.jpg


News Moderator: Robert Celt 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: Three Biggest Reasons Tobacco Giants Eye Lucrative $50 Billion Marijuana Market
Author: Richard Pollock
Contact: The Daily Caller
Photo Credit: None found
Website: The Daily Caller
 
Redeem Smoking: Millions of regular marijuana buyers extend their high by smoking the drug. That means legalized marijuana may help reduce the current stigma on regular cigarettes.
Highly doubtful, as everyone knows that tobacco is directly associated with cancer and the stigma is a direct result of people dying and that will not be diminished just because of Cannabis use, if anything, more people will quit using tobacco and go to less harmful Cannabis products.

Tobacco companies are now on a buying spree of e-cigarette companies which produce vaporizers, a smoking device marijuana users prefer because it can offer a higher high.

Bull crap, people use vaporizers because it's safer, not because they get you higher. Obviously these people are just speculating about something they really have no facts to back up and no personal experience with.

“They know how to make the product very well and very efficiently,” Glantz said. “More important, they know how to engineer the product to maximize the addictive potential, which is something that the current marijuana enterprises probably aren’t as good at.”

Ok? So are they saying they're going to put chemicals in their Cannabis products that cause addiction? I guess I won't be buying their products then, because I'd prefer to use Cannabis that's all natural and man made chemical free and something tells me I'm not alone in that one?

Glantz asserted tobacco companies “have the financial resources, product design technology to optimize puff-by-puff delivery of a psychoactive drug (nicotine), marketing muscle, and political clout to transform the marijuana market.”

Ok then, bring on the industrial might to get Cannabis legalized already, put your money where your mouth is if you think you can change political views. In fact, where have you been all this time "Johnny Come Lately"? Oh yea, you've been busy killing tens of millions of people with your poison, that's where!

A 2003 University of Florida study found that two out of three marijuana users follow the drug with mentholated cigarettes, which can extend the high.

Umm...? A little proof please? Who the hell ever said that menthol cigarettes made you're high last longer? Pure speculation and more talk without the facts to back up their claims. I know plenty of people that smoke menthol cigs and not one of them ever said there high was extended, and if they were to say that, I'd tell them that maybe it was the Cannabis itself that was just stronger and lasted longer and has nothing to do with what kind of cigarettes they were smoking.



Here's where I personally stand on this one, I don't have a problem with a giant conglomerate financially backing the legalization of Cannabis because of all the damage prohibition does to society and any financial backing to end this horrible war is welcome in my book, but that being said, nothing says we have to buy their products once they have payed to see it legalized, meaning that from a moral standpoint we as consumers have a right not to prop them up even further by buying something from them that we can grow for ourselves. So if they want to foot the bill for legalization, so be it, but I will not spend a dime buying they're Cannabis cigarettes when I can grow my own Cannabis and roll my own.

Now, if they just want to take over and monopolize the Cannabis industry and place restrictions that keep us from obtaining Cannabis either by growing it for ourselves or by letting other more benign sources supply us with Cannabis then that's when I'll have a problem with it and quite honestly, I believe it to be more than likely what's going on here. They want it all to themselves and will do all they can to have soul rights to the industry and that's the part that worries me. I can't help but believe that they have a hidden agenda and they're up to no good.

In other words, yes, we'll take your money to back legalization but don't think for one second that somehow we'll stand by and let you turn it into something immoral and distasteful when we're the ones that have taken it this far without your help and we don't want all our hard work stained by corporate poisoning.

It's kind of a catch 22 situation. On the one hand we want this war over as fast as possible so people who suffer from illness as well as those suffering in prison will have immediate relief, but on the other hand, we don't want a giant corporation dictating the way we choose to use Cannabis or making it into something that harms people just as much, if not worse than prohibition itself already does. We really need to keep a close eye on this one guys. Personally, I don't trust these people as far as I can throw them.
 
Of course they will want it all for themselves who else do you think they are but in reality doesn't every major corporation want, money is money. There facts are way off but when people read it on paper they figure it must be true. lol Just like 95% of the people think what they read on the internet is true. LMAO
Now vape gets you higher just shows they have NOT done any research on the matter. They would know first that its a cleaner high with much less antitoxins which is why it is a CLEANER high. I believe they know smoke in any form is on it's way out, not right around the corner but the writing is on the walls. Though business thinking NOW they can get what they can and see where it takes them.
That smoking methanol keeps you higher after... well i guess that was a small poll they did. I have been growing for over 40 years and know this is NOT true, but that might be more of a debate with my experience.
Florida had a lottery for the 5 nurseries that would grow for Florida. You had to have 30+ yerars and able to grow 300,000.00 +++ plants i believe. 3 of the nurseries where the ones on the panel who picked the lottery winners WTF. Someone was smart and filed against it... but does this not sound like big Tobacco or something they would try to do???
 
Yep, once again corporate yahoos are showing just how far behind the curve of reality they really are. I hate to tell them but no amount of poll taking and guess work will ever replace good old fashion personal experience.

Maybe they should think about coming to a place like 420 Magazine and picking the real experts brains about real world applications and scenarios?

It's quite obvious that they don't even consider asking experienced Cannabis users what we think, they just insist on sitting down with corporate marketing suits who have obviously never used Cannabis in their lives and trying to come up with things they think we may want to see in a legalized Cannabis society when in fact they're way off the mark with their ignorance.
 
Back
Top Bottom