Delps8
Well-Known Member
Chacun a son gout.
The guy who claims to be cranking out pounds in his basement is a grower. Dr Bugbee is a researcher in the area of growing cannabis.
If the guy who claims to be cranking out pounds in his basement can provide data about his grow so that it can be reproduced, that would be great. If not, that's all well and good for him but it does no one else any good. In contrast, Dr. Bugbee is in charge of a research team that conducts experiments and publishes the results so that growers around the world can increase their yields. And it's free.
The guy cranking out pounds in the basement could well be a great source of information but I have no idea. What we do know is that Dr. Bugbee is a source of information and the information that he gives away is based on reproducible experiments. I'd posit that the results of his experiments have allowed cannabis growers to increase their yields by tons. Tons of tons. Hundreds of thousands of tons. Dunno.
His approach is not for everyone. When I read postings on this site (and others), I can see that growers cover the spectrum (pardon the pun) from "Yeh, throw the seeds in the ground, water them every day or so and they'll do fine" to commercial growers to control every aspect of the grow. I'm pretty certain that the folks in the first category lead a lot lower stress life than the folks in the latter category but techniques and results that are not reproducible are called anecdotes.
We're free to run our grow any way we want to our grow. What's so valuable about what Dr Bugbee is sharing with the world is that his research team publishes the exact conditions under which the experiment was carried out. The guy cranking out bud in his basement might well say that he produces huge amounts of cannabis and that's a great anecdote ("story, report, grow journal, etc.) but it doesn't do anyone else any good unless he publishes his methods and those methods are reproducible by others.
[edit]
I've attached a pix of seedlings. 10 days ago, they were seeds. I've used an Apogee MQ-500 to dial the light levels of a Mars SP 3000 (dimmable) + an 18 watt T5 that hangs over one of the seedlings in this res. That's really granular but, heh, knowing exactly how much light is falling on each plant is sorta interesting different and it's really the only way to know how much usable light the plants are getting.
The guy who claims to be cranking out pounds in his basement is a grower. Dr Bugbee is a researcher in the area of growing cannabis.
If the guy who claims to be cranking out pounds in his basement can provide data about his grow so that it can be reproduced, that would be great. If not, that's all well and good for him but it does no one else any good. In contrast, Dr. Bugbee is in charge of a research team that conducts experiments and publishes the results so that growers around the world can increase their yields. And it's free.
The guy cranking out pounds in the basement could well be a great source of information but I have no idea. What we do know is that Dr. Bugbee is a source of information and the information that he gives away is based on reproducible experiments. I'd posit that the results of his experiments have allowed cannabis growers to increase their yields by tons. Tons of tons. Hundreds of thousands of tons. Dunno.
His approach is not for everyone. When I read postings on this site (and others), I can see that growers cover the spectrum (pardon the pun) from "Yeh, throw the seeds in the ground, water them every day or so and they'll do fine" to commercial growers to control every aspect of the grow. I'm pretty certain that the folks in the first category lead a lot lower stress life than the folks in the latter category but techniques and results that are not reproducible are called anecdotes.
We're free to run our grow any way we want to our grow. What's so valuable about what Dr Bugbee is sharing with the world is that his research team publishes the exact conditions under which the experiment was carried out. The guy cranking out bud in his basement might well say that he produces huge amounts of cannabis and that's a great anecdote ("story, report, grow journal, etc.) but it doesn't do anyone else any good unless he publishes his methods and those methods are reproducible by others.
[edit]
I've attached a pix of seedlings. 10 days ago, they were seeds. I've used an Apogee MQ-500 to dial the light levels of a Mars SP 3000 (dimmable) + an 18 watt T5 that hangs over one of the seedlings in this res. That's really granular but, heh, knowing exactly how much light is falling on each plant is sorta interesting different and it's really the only way to know how much usable light the plants are getting.