Big Island Candidates Spar Over Pot Laws

Jim Finnel

Fallen Cannabis Warrior & Ex News Moderator
Big Island mayoral candidates Billy Kenoi and Angel Pilago agreed on the need to protect the environment and improve infrastructure during yesterday's televised debate, but clashed over enforcement of marijuana laws.

Kenoi, 39, and Pilago, 63, sparred for half an hour on stage at the Hawaii Theatre in Honolulu in a debate sponsored by The Honolulu Advertiser and KGMB9.

Kenoi said he is opposed to an amendment to the county code on the Nov. 4 ballot that would instruct police to make enforcement of marijuana laws their lowest priority.

"I do not believe we should direct police on what they should or should not prioritize," Kenoi said.

Pilago said he will vote for the amendment. He said he does not use marijuana or condone its use, but favors the amendment because enforcement of marijuana laws has led to civil rights violations and has not been proven effective.

Kenoi was by far the highest vote getter in the Sept. 20 primary, pulling in more than twice the votes of Pilago, his nearest competitor. Kenoi also enjoyed the support of business groups such as the Hawai'i Island Chamber of Commerce, and an array of construction trades and government worker unions.

In addition to those advantages, Kenoi holds an edge in fundraising. He raised nearly $346,000 as of his most recent filing with the state Campaign Spending Commission, compared with $85,000 raised by Pilago.

*some content has been edited to meet posting guidelines


News Hawk: User: 420 MAGAZINE ® - Medical Marijuana Publication & Social Networking
Source: The Honolulu Advertiser
Copyright: 2008 The Honolulu Advertiser
Contact: HonoluluAdvertiser.com
Website: Big Island candidates spar over pot laws
 
"I do not believe we should direct police on what they should or should not prioritize," Kenoi said.

Police are policy implementers not policy deciders.

This is half the problem with prohibition - the police feel empowered to help decide whether something should be illegal or not. We constantly see police in California claim they are following Federal law, because they don't like the state law. Some continue this crap despite State Supreme Court rulings instructing them otherwise

Now we have a candidate, in Hawaii, for an executive office, essentially the manager, who is saying we don't need to manage the employees, we'll just let them decide what they want to do

This seems an easy decision for the voters; at least for those that are awake.
 
Back
Top Bottom