Medical Marijuana Advocates Respond to Aggressive Police Raids in San Jose

Jim Finnel

Fallen Cannabis Warrior & Ex News Moderator
Medical marijuana patients and advocates will descend on Tuesday's San Jose City Council meeting to convey their disapproval, and unwillingness to tolerate raids on medical marijuana dispensaries in their community. Over the past month, the Santa Clara County Specialized Enforcement Team, a local multi-agency police force, has carried out several raids on medical marijuana dispensaries in the city, the most recent of which occurred last Thursday. After the City Council meeting, advocates will host a "Know Your Rights" training at 7:30pm and a meeting to develop a raid alert system.
What: Patient advocates target San Jose City Council meeting to urge an end to police raids and unnecessary harassment of the medical marijuana community
When: Tuesday, November 9, 2010 at 3:30pm
Where: San Jose City Hall, 200 East Santa Clara Street
"The City of San Jose must not be able to continue its harmful campaign against medical marijuana patients with impunity," said Lauren Vazquez, of the Silicon Valley chapter of Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the country's largest medical marijuana advocacy organization. "Patients are organizing to put a stop to this behavior and to make local officials accountable for the aggressive actions of their police." The "Know Your Rights" training, hosted by ASA, will be held after the City Council meeting on Tuesday, November 9th at 7:30pm at 2000 Senter Road in San Jose.

Medical marijuana patient advocates held a rally on October 14th, in response to the initial raids, but local police have continued their campaign to use aggressive force in an attempt to shut down state law-compliant facilities in the city. The first set of raids in early October, targeting patients and local delivery services, resulted in 22 arrests. The subsequent dispensary raids in mid and late-October resulted in at least a dozen additional arrests and the seizure of more than 100 pounds of medical marijuana and other property.

Santa Clara Police Chief Stephen Lodge who is behind the recent spate of raids stated that, "Those arrested have perverted the important role of a caregiver for seriously ill patients for their own financial gain," but has provided no evidence of wrongdoing. In fact, those arrested claim to be operating under Health and Safety Code Section 11362.775, which defines collective and cooperative association, not "caregiving," which is defined under a different statute of the Medical Marijuana Program Act, passed by the California legislature in 2003. With the absence of any evidence of state law violations, advocates are demanding that charges be dropped against all of those arrested.

The most recent raid, this past Thursday, on San Jose Patients' Group, came only two days after voters approved Measure U to tax the local sale of medical marijuana at levels as high as 10 percent, on top of the state's existing sales tax. The City Council is also deliberating on a local ordinance that would regulate and license what has grown to more than eighty dispensaries in San Jose. The next meeting, which will address the amount of tax to levy against patients, is scheduled for December 13th. "How can the City of San Jose impose an exorbitant tax on the sale of medical marijuana at the same time as arresting and prosecuting the same people for selling it?" asked Vazquez. "This inconsistent and misguided practice has to end."




News Hawk: User: 420 MAGAZINE
Source: Americans for Safe Access
Copyright: 2008 Americans for Safe Access
Contact: info@safeaccessnow.org
Website: ASA : Medical Marijuana Advocates Respond to Aggressive Police Raids in San Jose
 
It is real simple. the state and municipalities get Federal funds for enforcing certain portions of the Federal drug laws. The city or county really do not care if the arrests results in a conviction or not, just that there is an arrest and booking, they get paid. Until someone actually amasses enough funds to go after this practice the municipalities will continue to enhance their revenue stream.

As outlined in this story; regardless of the lawfulness of the action, law enforcement is contradicting established codes of law. Great financial idea if you will; kind of like insurance of old. "Give me a weekly stipend and I will insure your business doesn't burn down and if it does we will help you rebuild." This was said by organized crime just 50 years ago.
In this case, pay your application fee, taxes and all other related expenses, build up an operation cost then we will shut you down and confiscate your product, preventing you from paying your rent, utilities and payroll.

Enough said.
 
It is real simple. the state and municipalities get Federal funds for enforcing certain portions of the Federal drug laws.

Do you have data to back this up? Not questioning your credibility, just curious as to how this happens....
 
One of the threats that the Feds put on the state of Calif. was that if prop 19 passed, they would remove Federal funding for all drug enforcement and education. This would cost the state billions.

Which brings me to my next pet peeve. Don't give them the money in the first place to be begged back. California is the 8th largest economy in the world now, it was the 6th. Why do we pay Federal taxes anyway? We, as Californians could afford anything we wanted if the funds didn't go to the Feds first then to be dolled back to us.
 
Back
Top Bottom