Stoney Girl
New Member
Madfingers posted this draft in another forum. For those of you that don't want to read the whole thing, here are the main points of what this would do (with some comments)
1) Requires doctor to certify that a caregiver is medically necessary to attend to patients daily needs.
2) Prohibits outdoor growsite within 1000 feet of schools.
3) Seedling size increases to 18 inches.
4) Requires tax lot number for growsite.
5) Authorizes inspection of growsite, grower, patient and caregiver residences, vehicles between 8am and 5 pm
6) Limits single address to 2 patient's growsites
7) Requires grower to possess grow site registration card to possess marijuana away from growsite.
8) Expands background check restrictions to any jurisdiction
9) Deletes reimbursement language
10)Deletes language saying application and proof of mailing has same effect as registry card.
11) Notifies police of change of growsite
12) Cardholder loses exemption if possessing other drugs, using marijuana if not a patient.
13) Caregiver limited to two patients
14) Deletes language that says LEO may confiscate only marijuana in excess of limit
15) Provide LEO all patient info (grower name and address, caregiver name and address).
16) Eliminates the ACMM
17) Lowers possession limit to 16 ounces, hash to 2 ounces.
There are a few other things as well.
It is not clear if there is another amended version of SB 388 that the committee will consider on April 20. This draft is obviously the LE wish list.
With so many horrible provisions it is hard to identify the worst but I think 5) and 6) would be the most damaging.
Limiting an address to only 2 patient gardens would mean that 4,563 patients would lose their garden immediately. That of course would be devastating to those patients. There would also be much less excess to share because of all the restrictions.
This inspections are a horrible infringement on patients rights but in practice it is hard to imagine where the resources would come from to actually do many. I suspect that they would just go after people they don't like.
The good news is that this has not passed out of committee. And even if it does we will have other opportunities to stop it.
Please contact your legislators and tell them to vote NO on SB 388
John Sajo.
Thank you John and Jim..
Please let me know how this would affect you or the one the you love.
Please let me know if I can visit with you in Salem on Monday.
There are buses leaving from Portland and Gresham.
There are people who you can ride with.
I suggest dressing sharp and wearing a simple marijuana leaf or pin.
This one is worth a day off from work.
C ya there.
tGS
1) Requires doctor to certify that a caregiver is medically necessary to attend to patients daily needs.
2) Prohibits outdoor growsite within 1000 feet of schools.
3) Seedling size increases to 18 inches.
4) Requires tax lot number for growsite.
5) Authorizes inspection of growsite, grower, patient and caregiver residences, vehicles between 8am and 5 pm
6) Limits single address to 2 patient's growsites
7) Requires grower to possess grow site registration card to possess marijuana away from growsite.
8) Expands background check restrictions to any jurisdiction
9) Deletes reimbursement language
10)Deletes language saying application and proof of mailing has same effect as registry card.
11) Notifies police of change of growsite
12) Cardholder loses exemption if possessing other drugs, using marijuana if not a patient.
13) Caregiver limited to two patients
14) Deletes language that says LEO may confiscate only marijuana in excess of limit
15) Provide LEO all patient info (grower name and address, caregiver name and address).
16) Eliminates the ACMM
17) Lowers possession limit to 16 ounces, hash to 2 ounces.
There are a few other things as well.
It is not clear if there is another amended version of SB 388 that the committee will consider on April 20. This draft is obviously the LE wish list.
With so many horrible provisions it is hard to identify the worst but I think 5) and 6) would be the most damaging.
Limiting an address to only 2 patient gardens would mean that 4,563 patients would lose their garden immediately. That of course would be devastating to those patients. There would also be much less excess to share because of all the restrictions.
This inspections are a horrible infringement on patients rights but in practice it is hard to imagine where the resources would come from to actually do many. I suspect that they would just go after people they don't like.
The good news is that this has not passed out of committee. And even if it does we will have other opportunities to stop it.
Please contact your legislators and tell them to vote NO on SB 388
John Sajo.
Thank you John and Jim..
Please let me know how this would affect you or the one the you love.
Please let me know if I can visit with you in Salem on Monday.
There are buses leaving from Portland and Gresham.
There are people who you can ride with.
I suggest dressing sharp and wearing a simple marijuana leaf or pin.
This one is worth a day off from work.
C ya there.
tGS
