Bnelly
Well-Known Member
Happy Monday! Welcome to my thoughts haha pull up a chair, share thoughts, etc. These next bunch of words are gonna sound incredibly stoner-like. Please bare with me
So after smoking my after school bowl I remembered a post and thoughts from a few days ago, I freefalled, or would it be freefell, sorry lol, down the rabbit hole trying to find anything on the science behind the shapes of the teeth on grinders and the uses/benefits of them.
I saw a post from the founder of Raw Papers on instagram, where he mentioned redesigning the teeth in their version 2 grinder. Which got me thinking, "If there was no benefit to the design change they wouldn't have changed the teeth. It would've cost more money than just reusing the same design or updating the design maybe."
As much money as companies try to pump into production and efficiency to fully take advantage of the economy of scale, I can't imagine that they would just randomly pick a shape of arguably one of the most important aspects of their product. I know, through a s**t ton of science and physics type documentaries that are so riveting when you're baked and a few college courses, that different shapes and angles generate different properties and characteristics. For instance, a square tilted at 45°, moving through a fluid at speed, has a completely different coefficient of drag and produces way less turbulence than a square tilted at 0°. So the same would hold true no matter the scale, from planetary size to the extremely minuscule. Changing the angle and shape of the initial contact face wildly changes all of the other properties as well.
Turns out there isn't really anything I could find on the interwebs lol granted we are talking about incredibly unimportant scientific work here , so I wasn't really expecting anything either.
I'm hoping there's some crazy, awesome engineers in here that might have some insight into the matter. I'm kind of at a wall here so figure I'll ask for some assistance.
Thanks for the read and have a fantastic week! Cheers
So after smoking my after school bowl I remembered a post and thoughts from a few days ago, I freefalled, or would it be freefell, sorry lol, down the rabbit hole trying to find anything on the science behind the shapes of the teeth on grinders and the uses/benefits of them.
I saw a post from the founder of Raw Papers on instagram, where he mentioned redesigning the teeth in their version 2 grinder. Which got me thinking, "If there was no benefit to the design change they wouldn't have changed the teeth. It would've cost more money than just reusing the same design or updating the design maybe."
As much money as companies try to pump into production and efficiency to fully take advantage of the economy of scale, I can't imagine that they would just randomly pick a shape of arguably one of the most important aspects of their product. I know, through a s**t ton of science and physics type documentaries that are so riveting when you're baked and a few college courses, that different shapes and angles generate different properties and characteristics. For instance, a square tilted at 45°, moving through a fluid at speed, has a completely different coefficient of drag and produces way less turbulence than a square tilted at 0°. So the same would hold true no matter the scale, from planetary size to the extremely minuscule. Changing the angle and shape of the initial contact face wildly changes all of the other properties as well.
Turns out there isn't really anything I could find on the interwebs lol granted we are talking about incredibly unimportant scientific work here , so I wasn't really expecting anything either.
I'm hoping there's some crazy, awesome engineers in here that might have some insight into the matter. I'm kind of at a wall here so figure I'll ask for some assistance.
Thanks for the read and have a fantastic week! Cheers