Can't find this question or answer anywhere. I couldnt be the only concerned grower? So why is the mars2 more expensove then the reflector? If the reflectors supposibly use exactly the same chips etc then why are the reclectors priced at a much lower price.? It wouldnt make sense to me. How? The reflectors have 16+ more leds then the mars2 per unit. Thats the main concern. Are the leds in the reflector not fully epistar. Are they a mix of the old 3 watt or cheaper made leds? Is that why? The mars2 use actual epistar 5w and reflector gets an abundance of lower rated less valued leds to make up for the compensation of more leds per unit? Please any feedback would be much appreciated.
The mars2 get better penetration because they are placed closer. Well the reflector has more leds and a bigger unit. So the spread is bigger but it would still penetrate just as deep maybe a inch or so less? Would really enjoy some feedback as this is really botherimg me. Mars has yet to give me a feasible answer..
-tetralpha
The mars2 get better penetration because they are placed closer. Well the reflector has more leds and a bigger unit. So the spread is bigger but it would still penetrate just as deep maybe a inch or so less? Would really enjoy some feedback as this is really botherimg me. Mars has yet to give me a feasible answer..
-tetralpha