Medical-Pot Patients Decry How State Bans Home-Growing Within 25 Miles Of Dispensarie

Truth Seeker

New Member
Medical-marijuana patients and advocates are decrying state health officials' interpretation of a rule that bans growth of the plant within 25miles of an operating dispensary.

Authors of the state's medical-marijuana law intended to limit home growers by forcing people to buy at dispensaries. But amid prolonged legal battles over the law, no dispensaries opened and home-growing flourished.

But the opening of four medical-marijuana dispensaries in Phoenix, Tucson and Cochise County have brought the 25-mile rule to the forefront.

Over time, the vast majority of patients who live within 25miles of dispensaries will not be permitted to legally cultivate pot. The Arizona Department of Health Services, which oversees the program, issues cards that allow patients to use medical marijuana, grow it or both. Those cards must be renewed each year, and those who live within 25miles of an operating dispensary will not be allowed to grow the plant.

But how the distance is calculated, whether it's "as the crow flies" or "as the car drives," is a key point of controversy.

State health officials interpret the rule as the area within a 25-mile radius of a dispensary.

Many patients and advocates, however, say the rule should be interpreted as driving distance – actual mileage measured on an odometer driving from one location to another. They argue that the state's interpretation unfairly covers too much ground and bans too many people from growing in their homes.

New figures obtained by The Arizona Republic from the ADHS show that 64percent of the state's population lives within a 25-mile radius of a dispensary.

The agency reports that nearly 49percent of Arizonans are within 25 miles of the Glendaledispensary; less than half of a percentage point of Arizonans live within 25miles of the Cochise County dispensary; and nearly 15percent of state residents live within 25miles of the two Tucson-area dispensaries.

Within the medical-marijuana community, controversy over the 25-mile rule has dominated discussion.

Lately, it has fired up the audience on WeEducated, a Web talk show about medical marijuana in Arizona, said Kristie Austin, 31, a show host.

"It should not be measured as the crow flies," said Austin, of Phoenix.

"It should be measured by roads – like via MapQuest. If you live on the other side of a mountain range, and it takes two hours to get to a dispensary, that's ridiculous."

Austin is a medical-marijuana cardholder who uses the drug to ease pain brought on by endometriosis.

Like many other medical-marijuana patients, Austin also argues that the 25-mile rule places unfair burdens on patients who either can't drive or must leave their neighborhoods to get their medicine.

Patients also argue that the rule forces them to pay more for their medicine. It's cheaper to grow the plant at home rather than spend hundreds of dollars each month at dispensaries for their supplies, they say.

Those arguments don't sway state ADHS Director Will Humble, who stands by his agency's interpretation of the rule.

He pointed out that the rule was written into the voter-approved law and, therefore, his agency is required to implement it.

"This is not something we can change," he said.

Not easily, at least.

The Legislature could alter the rule with a three-quarters vote, or voters could amend the law.

Humble said that when the agency in 2011 decided to interpret the 25-mile rule "as the crow files," there was "hardly any feedback" from the public. In recent months, the agency has received some complaints from cardholders, he said.

"One of the things you have to do, when writing the rules, is you need to make it generally applicable – so, 25miles means 25miles," he told The Republic. "Roads change over time. Sometimes, there's dirt roads, washes. ... Roads get graded, they become impassable. Sometimes, local jurisdictions change roads and make them dead-ends. There's just so many variables if you were to try to measure by roads."

If dispensaries continue to open at the current pace, legal home cultivation of marijuana will be virtually non-existent, Humble said.

That doesn't sit well with patients like Richard Kline, a Glendale resident who uses medical marijuana for the chronic pain from neck and back injuries caused by motorcycle wrecks and getting dragged by a truck.

Kline said he and his wife, also a medical-marijuana patient, will struggle to pay for their medicine once they renew their medical-marijuana cards.

The couple live about 5 miles from a dispensary in Glendale, which opened last month.

"This rule and how the state is reading it – as the crow flies – is just outrageous," Kline said.

MMJ_Patient_Growing.JPG


News Hawk- TruthSeekr420 420 MAGAZINE
Source: azcentral.com
Author: Yvonne Wingett Sanchez
 
Re: Medical-Pot Patients Decry How State Bans Home-Growing Within 25 Miles Of Dispens

so after learning how to grow investing hundreds to thousands of dollars getting it built so you can grow your own medicine a dispensary can open 25 mils from you and all you have invested is for not even if you have to drive 50 miles to pay totally outrageously over priced meds grown with god knows what chemical based ferts and pesticides!! some ppl are allergic to anything but 100% organic meds, i can grow my own 100% organic meds fed worm castings i make in the garage in the worm bin, all for a very reasonable amount i have never actually done the math, but i know its not some crazy price like 15-50$ a gram i have seen the dispensaries charge, plain and simple many ppl wont be able to afford meds unless they can grow them, i know i will not ever set foot in a dispensary if the rule is not fixed and the dispensaries all get on board supporting the "no 25 mile" rule cause, and if im ever forced to quit growing then i will be forced to do without my very needed meds, and start looking for a place to move to where i can grow

so fellow arizonans stand up and tell em no 25 mile rule!! its wrong and hurts the most sick and poor of us all, dont even go to the dispensary unless they are actively supporting the no 25 mile rule and fighting to help us keep our right to create our own safe medicine
think about this if you can only buy meds from the dispensary and they have to grow their own product, they control the supply and set the price then its really just a state run monopoly and smells alot like a gang/cartel type thing, no other mmj state has a stupid hurtful rule like this and the dispensaries are doing just fine, i know you guys are gonna be pissed if you suddenly are told you cant use all that awesome equipment you plunked down a grip of cash to get
it will hurt more than patients, think about all the hydro shops that will close because lets face it ppl dont spend that kind of money to grow indoor hydroponic veggies that would support all the hydro/garden shops, so all those ppl lose their jobs too, sad and wrong
ok im gonna get down off my soap box...for now
 
Re: Medical-Pot Patients Decry How State Bans Home-Growing Within 25 Miles Of Dispens

Will Humble can't change it, nor can the DHS. The opponents will squeeze banning MMJ into the midterms in 2014, and that is a blessing in disguise. All it takes is enough signatures between now and then, to ALSO add repealing the 25 mile rule to the ballot.

The much decried commercial cannabis interests were able to get it done, but can the cannabis community? Maybe if threatened with loss of medicine or liberty...

That is ONE remedy. The other is even better and can happen before 2014 midterms.

Remedy TWO:
Congressmen from CO and WA sucessfully get congress to change the scheduling and treatment of cannabis. This is the ONLY legislative remedy to resolve the conflict between federal law and state law. With this change, 25 mile rule enforcement would be pointless.

Remedy THREE:
ASA v. DEA is ruled upon (this year) in favor of the ASA. The courts could order the DEA to reschedule UNTIL there is scientific evidence to support schedule A.

Remedy FOUR:
Someone in AZ actually harmed (standing) by the rule wins in court to overturn the law based on "equal protection".

Country after country, court after court is reversing decades of failed cannabis prohibition.

So take heart, times they are a changin'
 
Back
Top Bottom