giantleprechaun
New Member
This goes with the 5th amendment defence.
Scientific definition of the word law. Through a scientific experiment
Hypothesis = what is stated in the legislative bill = If A+B then C
A = Nature of accusation = essential characteristics =
TX Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)
B = Cause of accusation = actions taken by defense = doing penal code 481.120 possession 481.121 delivery.
C = Accusation = outcome or result =
Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)
Experiment = Control = Accusation Statement =
Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)
Variable = what really happened in this case =
TX Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession and / or 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)
Outcome or Result = C = Accusation
Outcome = If control A+B=C,
And if the variable A+B=outcome,
are the same 100% of the time
Then it is law.
? = Is the accusation of exemptions, the same as the accusation possession?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
? = Is the accusation of possession, the same as the accusation delivery?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
? = Is the accusation of delivery, the same as the accusation of not receiving remuneration?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
? = Is the accusation of marijuana, the same as the accusation of schedule 1?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
If the Nature, the Cause, and the Accusation, are not the same,
Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
If the control Nature and the Cause, and the variable Nature and Cause,
are not the same, Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self incrimination will occur
If the Nature is not the same as the Cause,
Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
(Theory of Relativity)
Please tell me your views on this subject. Can we please end this War?
Scientific definition of the word law. Through a scientific experiment
Hypothesis = what is stated in the legislative bill = If A+B then C
A = Nature of accusation = essential characteristics =
TX Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)
B = Cause of accusation = actions taken by defense = doing penal code 481.120 possession 481.121 delivery.
C = Accusation = outcome or result =
Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)
Experiment = Control = Accusation Statement =
Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)
Variable = what really happened in this case =
TX Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession and / or 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)
Outcome or Result = C = Accusation
Outcome = If control A+B=C,
And if the variable A+B=outcome,
are the same 100% of the time
Then it is law.
? = Is the accusation of exemptions, the same as the accusation possession?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
? = Is the accusation of possession, the same as the accusation delivery?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
? = Is the accusation of delivery, the same as the accusation of not receiving remuneration?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
? = Is the accusation of marijuana, the same as the accusation of schedule 1?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
If the Nature, the Cause, and the Accusation, are not the same,
Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
If the control Nature and the Cause, and the variable Nature and Cause,
are not the same, Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self incrimination will occur
If the Nature is not the same as the Cause,
Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
(Theory of Relativity)
Please tell me your views on this subject. Can we please end this War?