Scientific Law

[giantleprechaun]

This goes with the 5th amendment defence.
Scientific definition of the word law. Through a scientific experiment

Hypothesis = what is stated in the legislative bill = If A+B then C
A = Nature of accusation = essential characteristics =
TX Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)

B = Cause of accusation = actions taken by defense = doing penal code 481.120 possession 481.121 delivery.

C = Accusation = outcome or result =
Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)

Experiment = Control = Accusation Statement =
Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession - 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)

Variable = what really happened in this case =
TX Controlled Substance Act is TX penal code 481.001 - 481.205,
not being TX penal code 481.062 - 481.063 Exemptions
while doing (action) TX penal code 481.120 Possession and / or 481.121 Delivery
with marijuana (property)

Outcome or Result = C = Accusation
Outcome = If control A+B=C,
And if the variable A+B=outcome,
are the same 100% of the time
Then it is law.

? = Is the accusation of exemptions, the same as the accusation possession?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.

? = Is the accusation of possession, the same as the accusation delivery?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.

? = Is the accusation of delivery, the same as the accusation of not receiving remuneration?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.

? = Is the accusation of marijuana, the same as the accusation of schedule 1?
No, then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.

If the Nature, the Cause, and the Accusation, are not the same,
Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.

If the control Nature and the Cause, and the variable Nature and Cause,
are not the same, Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self incrimination will occur

If the Nature is not the same as the Cause,
Then double jeopardy occurs and / or self-incrimination will occur.
(Theory of Relativity)

Please tell me your views on this subject. Can we please end this War?

 

[texasbrick]

i don't know, toooo deep for me. i never was good at math equasions.

 

[giantleprechaun]

Sorry I forgot the Links
Texas Controled Substance Act TX penal code 481
https://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/HS/content/htm/hs.006.00.000481.00.htm

More questions and answers for Texas Law
https://www.geocities.com/giantleprechaun619/freedom2.html

10th Amendment
Equal Rights, Federal power, State power, and the Peoples power

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the State, are reserved to the State respectively, or the people."

10.1 "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,"
? = Was the power directly given to the Federal government by the Constitution?
No, the right to property and Liberty are given to the people.

10.2 "nor prohibited by it to the State,"
? = Is TX penal code 481.120 possession 481.121delivery prohibited by the State?
Yes, so the State does not have the right to 481.120 possession or 481.121 delivery, and the State does not have the violate TX penal code 481.120 possession 481.121 delivery to get the evidence to the court room.

10.3"are reserved to the State respectively, or the people."
? = Is the right given to the people?
Yes, the right to property is given to the people. (see 4th Amendment)

If the right is not given to the Federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited by the State, then the power is given the State, if it is not given to the people.

Remember all State and Federal reprehensive are the people as well, and All people were created Equal.

Is this right or wrong?
If so what can you tell me?

 

[rome420]

ok no ieda what your talking about man , switch the wording around so we can understand it

 

[giantleprechaun]

Please pick a part you want me to talk about. What type of format do you want me to use? I found Yes / No questions work the best. To get the point across.

1 Will this work for you?
Yes / No

If I take a little while to get back to your questions it is because I am only able to check this about once, but sometimes twice a day. I will try to post all responces the next day. Thank you for your understanding

 

[giantleprechaun]

Some definitions for you to know to understand what I mean.

Innocence
The state, quality, or virtue of being innocent, as: Guiltlessness of a specific legal crime or offense.
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

Double
Composed of two unlike parts; dual: a double meaning; a double role for an actor.
Something increased twofold.
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

Jeopardy
Law A defendant's risk or danger of conviction when put on trial.
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

Act
The process of doing or performing something:
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

Possession
The act or fact of possessing. Something owned or possessed.
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

Delivery
The act of transferring to another. Law A formal act of transferring ownership of property to another: delivery of a deed
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

Scientific Method
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos
The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis.

Law
The body of rules and principles governing the affairs of a community and enforced by a political authority; a legal system:
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

2 Does this help you?
Yes / No

 

[giantleprechaun]

Hypothesis = what is stated in the legislative bill = If A+B then C
A = Nature of accusation = essential characteristics =
Controlled Substance Act is,
not being Exemptions,
while doing (action) Possession Delivery
with marijuana (property).

B = Cause of accusation = actions taken by defense =
doing possession delivery.

C = Accusation = outcome or result =
Controlled Substance Act is,
not being Exemptions,
while doing (action) Possession Delivery
with marijuana (property).

Experiment = Control = Accusation Statement =
Controlled Substance Act is,
not being Exemptions,
while doing (action) Possession Delivery
with marijuana (property).

Variable = what really happened in this case = defendents actions =
Controlled Substance Act is,
not being Exemptions
while doing (action) Possession and/or Delivery
with marijuana (property).

Outcome or Result = C = Accusation
Controlled Substance Act is,
not being Exemptions,
while doing (action) Possession Delivery
with marijuana (property).

Outcome =
If control A+B=C,
And the variable A+B=C,
are the same 100% of the time
Then it is law.

? = Is the act of exemptions, the same act as possession? No, then you are being charged with two diffrent acts, 1st the act of not being exemptions, 2nd the act of possession.
3 Do you see how there is double jeopardy here? Yes/No
4 Do you undestand how to preform acts of "self-incrimination?"Yes/No
? = Is the act of possession, the same act as delivery? No, then you are being charged with two diffrent acts, 1st the act of possession, then the act of delivery.
5 Do you see how there is double jeopardy here? Yes/No
6 Is there something specific you have a question about? Yes/No
After the defendent has been found guilty of possession the defendent must befound guilty of the type of property they possess the marijuana.
7 Do you see how the defendent is found GUILTY in two diffrent areas in order to be convicted?Yes/no

 

[giantleprechaun]

Hope to help people understand what I am trying to say.

This is just reworded to help.
Accusation = Controlled Substance Act is, not being Exemptions, while doing (action) Possession / Delivery, with property (marijuana).

In the part of the Accusation of not being an Exemption, is there a process of judging wither or not the defendant fits into the range of question? Yes, there is an process of jeopardy#1. When you make this process of judgment do you have to take any evidence from me in order to make this judgment? Yes, I must give up incriminating evidence to prove that I am not an Exemption. Did the defendant do this Act? If no, than the defendant must be found not guilty. This Act of Exemptions there is a process of judgment (jeopardy #1), and the prosecution must use self-incriminating evidence to prove the defendant is not an Exemption. Is this Act one of Public Danger? No, there is no Public Danger in not being an Exemption.

In the part of the Accusation of Possession, is there a process of judging wither or not the defendant posses the property in question? Yes, there is an process of jeopardy#2 to see if the defendant did or did not. When you make this process of judgment do you have to take any evidence from the defendant in order to make this judgment? Yes, I must give up incriminating evidence (search is a process of self-incrimination) to prove that the defendant did or did not Possess the property in question. Did the defendant do this Act? If no, than the defendant must be found not guilty. In this Act of Possession there is a process of judgment (jeopardy #2), and the prosecution must use self-incriminating evidence (evidence taken from the defendant his possession) to prove the defendant is Possessing the property in question. Is there Public Danger in the Act of Possession? No, there is no Act of Public Danger when I have property in my possession.

In the part of the Accusation Marijuana, is there a process of judging wither or not the defendant has the property in the range of question? Yes, there is an process of jeopardy#3. When you make this process of judgment do you have to take any evidence from the defendant in order to make this judgment? Yes, I must give up incriminating evidence (search is an Act of self-incrimination to prove that I have Property. Did the defendant do this Act? If no, than the defendant must be found not guilty. This Act of Marijuana there is a process of judgment (jeopardy #3), and the prosecution must use self-incriminating evidence to prove the defendant had the property (marijuana) in question. Is there an Act of Public Danger in Marijuana? No, Marijuana is property, not an Act you can perform, so there is no Public Danger. Or am I wrong here? How do you perform the Act of Marijuana?

Does this help?
Do you feel you understand what I am trying to say?

 

[SupraXT]

I Have No Idea What Any Of That Is? Are You Trying To Say Marijuana Is Illegal Because I Think We Know That!

 

[giantleprechaun]

Light one up. I just did.

I Have No Idea What Any Of That Is?

What would you like to know? I need somewhere to start to explain what I mean. Can you pick something you want to know the most about?

Are You Trying To Say Marijuana Is Illegal Because I Think We Know That!

No, I am trying to say Marijuana is not illegal because the law violates your Civil Rights. How can you be charged with a crime if it is a violation of your Civil Rights. Can you pick somewhere to start? I would like to help you understand. And I would like to end the War on Marijuana.

I am throwing a rally to sign a petition if you want to attend meet me at 4:20pm on April 20, at the Earl Campbell building at 1100 Commerce St Dallas TX 75242.