PlanetJ
Well-Known Member
Ã'm adapting this question from a different forum, where I stumbled upon a thread about this issue.
The starting post of the thread goes like this:
Since I have no thermodynamics textbook, I kinda have to accept this on faith, but independend google searches confirm this, unless you inclulde canabis growing communities.
Aluminium foil - Wikipedia
Aluminium - Attributes and Properties of Aluminium Foil
For this reason I feel no need to adapt this post, and would like to use it as opening question.
At the bottom of page one, a user replies:
And this kinda ends the discussion I'd say, from page 2:
Given this, what remains of the statement that mylar is better, and why are most reflectors made of aluminium, and not some sort of mylar application, if mylar is truly better for the job ? (keeping in mind that the reflective agent in mylar is, aluminium)
Am I missing a bigger picture, where mylar has other properties that make it better over-all ?
The starting post of the thread goes like this:
Starting post:
khronik
Mylar vs. foil
For a long time I assumed everyone knew what they were talking about when they said not to use aluminum foil, and to use mylar. Apparently foil can create hot spots. But here's the thing, so can mylar. In fact, it's often used precisely because of its ability to reflect heat!
Anyway, I've heard all sorts of misinformation, like that aluminum foil is only 40% reflective whereas mylar is 98% reflective. So I looked up some data in my thermodynamics textbook from college. Actually, polished aluminum is MORE reflective than mylar! Most mylar has a bit of transparency to it, whereas aluminum is completely opaque. And here's the kicker: mylar is made reflective by depositing aluminum on it!
Aluminum is used because it has a reflectivity of 92-98% depending on the wavelength of the light. Granted, aluminum foil isn't the same as pure aluminum, and isn't optimized for reflectivity, but still, according to its thermodynamic properties, there is NO difference between the way aluminum and mylar reflect light. The only difference seems to be that mylar is much easier to work with, which admittedly, is a major advantage.
So here's my question: is there a reason you guys say not to use foil, or are you just repeating what others have said?
Since I have no thermodynamics textbook, I kinda have to accept this on faith, but independend google searches confirm this, unless you inclulde canabis growing communities.
Aluminium foil - Wikipedia
Aluminium - Attributes and Properties of Aluminium Foil
For this reason I feel no need to adapt this post, and would like to use it as opening question.
At the bottom of page one, a user replies:
clovisman
I am a pro-commercial photographer and teach advanced lighting classes at 2 universities- here is a photographers opinion based upon 25years of bouncing light- mylar and foil definetly create hot spots with reflected light- if you use foil first wad it up and spread back out- the wrinkles will bounce the light back in all directions- i have found that nothing beats a satin white surface - there is a much more even distributation of the light rays bouncing off this surface where mylar acts as a lens and will focus light rays if the surface is not completely smooth which is near impossible to do-the room I use to start my plants is white
And this kinda ends the discussion I'd say, from page 2:
khronik
Here's the thing: every source I can find that claims aluminum foil is less than 50% reflectivity is inevitably linked to the cannabis-growing community. This leads me to believe there is a pot-growing book out there with misinformation in it about aluminum foil.Originally Posted by BeforeYourTime View Post
Holland Hydroponics - Reflective Material
Foil may reflect more heat but mylar wins hands down on light reflectivity.
Originally Posted by elstonite View Post
foil causes hotspots and aint recommended for growing cannabis
Apparently, there is a group out there called the "European Aluminum Foil Association" that knows everything there is to know about aluminum foil. Must be a boring group of folks, but they do know foil! Anyway, here is what they say:
"[Aluminum foil] reflects approximately 98% of radiant heat and light. There is no difference between the reflectivity of a bright and a matte foil surface."
source: alufoil - European Aluminium Foil Association
Yes, I have a lot of free time at work. I told my boss yesterday that I don't have much to do and that he should find me more work but he hasn't yet.
Given this, what remains of the statement that mylar is better, and why are most reflectors made of aluminium, and not some sort of mylar application, if mylar is truly better for the job ? (keeping in mind that the reflective agent in mylar is, aluminium)
Am I missing a bigger picture, where mylar has other properties that make it better over-all ?